More handpicked essays just for you.
Sexism and female oppression in the film industry
How does movies depict stereotypes prezi
How does movies depict stereotypes prezi
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sexism and female oppression in the film industry
Hollywood easily comes to mind when we think of films. Produced from the United States of America, one cannot deny the immense influence of Hollywood in the global film industry. Tom Brook (2014) in his article How the global box office is changing Hollywood likened it to an octopus with tentacles extending to different countries across the globe. Women in Hollywood are often visual accessories and are reflected outside of the man’s world. Women representations are fixed and mediated, taking away the ability to reflect the current social reality (Kuhn, 1982). Through visual semiotic analysis of women representation in top grossing Hollywood films from 2010 to 2012, Reema Dutt (2014) saw that women are peppered with images expected of a woman. The Avengers, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2, and Toy Story 3 reflected women in a male-dominated society. …show more content…
Mulvey further argued that in a sexual imbalance setting, the male protagonist gets to make things happen whereas the female is more passive and becomes a figure to be looked at and displayed for the male spectator's pleasure. Teresa de Laureti (1984) also examined the structural representations of "woman" in cinema, indicating that cinemas should be understood as a signifying practice because of its direct implication in the production and reproduction of meanings, values, and ideology. De Laureti tapped semiotics to further explain cinema as a semiotic process wherein the subject is continually engaged, represented, and inscribed in ideology. According to her, cinemas as imaging machines produce images (of women or not women) also creates woman as an
Today’s culture sees a gap between the male and female gender. This is evident in everything from the films we watch, music we listen to, and even in our everyday lives. Historically, this issue has seen an even larger gap, and can be observed in the films that were made during that time. Vertigo and Citizen Kane both show the objectification of women by controlling them, writing them in supportive roles, and placing their value in the way that they look.
Film making has gone through quite the substantial change since it’s initial coining just before the turn of the 19th century, and one would tend argue that the largest amount of this change has come quite recently or more so in the latter part of film’s history as a whole. One of the more prominent changes having taken place being the role of women in film. Once upon a time having a very set role in the industry, such as editing for example. To mention briefly the likes of Dede Allen, Verna Fields, Thelma Schoonmaker and so forth. Our female counterparts now occupy virtually every aspect of the film making industry that males do; and in many instances excel past us. Quite clearly this change has taken place behind the lens, but has it taken
Asian Americans only make up a small percent of the American population. Even more significant is that this percentage live mostly on the west and east coasts of mainland United States and Hawaii; leaving the rest of the American population to most likely get their exposures to Asians through television and movies. However the exposure they have receive throughout the history of cinematography has been hardly flattering. Throughout the course of history Asians in film have been portrayed as evil or the "yellow peril" as described by others. If Asians are not being classified as evil in this picture then they are most likely the comic relief, with their lack of coordination or grasp of the English language. With these common stereotypes in place, it gives a white American viewer a sense or need to destroy this Asian villain or superiority over the comedic character portrayed in the film.
Women in Film as Portrayed in the Movie, Double Indemnity. Introduction American commercial cinema currently fuels many aspects of society. In the twenty-first century, it has become available, active force in the perception of gender relations in the United States. In the earlier part of this century filmmakers, as well as the public, did not necessarily view the female “media image” as an infrastructure of sex inequality.
(4) Conventional is easy. Whenever an idea is generally perceived by society as standard or traditional it becomes very easy to display to the public without the raise of an eyebrow. This is the basis on which stereotypes appear in films. You’d think in the 21st century where what once were radical notions like same sex marriage and recreational drug use are being legalized that something uncalled for like the constant portrayal of character stereotyping would come to an end. Alas, stereotypical characters continue to emerge in film and unfortunately have become a staple of Hollywood because they’re simple and straightforward, requiring little effort on the part of the writers or thinking from the audience.
Not all African Americans are thugs and people that do not work. A lot of them have successful careers and have put in the time and effort to have good work ethic and be good people. African Americans have had a difficult history in the American film industry. During the early 20th century of filmmaking, blacks were stereotyped as not worthy of being in films, and they were only certain types of characters such as servants, mammies, and butlers. From several decades of filmmaking, African Americans have been sought out to be trouble makers, incapables, intellectually limited, and also lazy. Although blacks have won Academy Awards for acting, screenwriting, and music production they still find trouble in getting quality roles within the film industry. (Common Black Stereotypes)
Non-white minorities make up 37.4% of the population (United States), but they only account for 23.6% of the speaking roles in all movies (Smith). These numbers are alarming considering that 44% of movie tickets in the United States are bought by people of color (Smith). The root of this problem is in Hollywood’s bad habit of casting white actors for leading roles, even in cases when characters have a different race in the movie’s source material. Audiences in America have become comfortable with seeing mostly white actors on cinema screens, but that does not mean that there is not a problem. Even though minorities may not make up a large percentage of the population, they purchase more media than white Americans.
These movies allowed female characters to embody all the contradictions that could make them a woman. They were portrayed as the “femme fatale” and also “mother,” the “seductress” and at the same time the “saint,” (Newsom, 2011). Female characters were multi-faceted during this time and had much more complexity and interesting qualities than in the movies we watch today. Today, only 16% of protagonists in movies are female, and the portrayal of these women is one of sexualization and dependence rather than complexity (Newsom, 2011).
Led by Laura Mulvey, feminist film critics have discussed the difficulty presented to female spectators by the controlling male gaze and narrative generally found in mainstream film, creating for female spectators a position that forces them into limited choices: "bisexual" identification with active male characters; identification with the passive, often victimized, female characters; or on occasion, identification with a "masculinized" active female character, who is generally punished for her unhealthy behavior. Before discussing recent improvements, it is important to note that a group of Classic Hollywood films regularly offered female spectators positive, female characters who were active in controlling narrative, gazing and desiring: the screwball comedy.
“This was supposed to restructure the representation of women in film so there would be more positive ‘role models’ for young girls to look up too. (Chaudhuri, 2006)” (Sutherland, Feltey, 2016). Making films that put out more positive images truly change the way women in real life see themselves. “These effects shape the personal identity of women given that people naturally adopt traits of the representations that they see of themselves,” (Trujillo, Sim,
While watching movies, have you ever noticed that the villains in almost every single Hollywood film are of Middle Eastern or European descent? In a reoccurring theme of Hollywood, the villains in these films are almost always foreigners or people of color. This is a stereotype. On the other side of the spectrum, we often see that the heroes of these films are most often than not white males. This is another stereotype. Within the last few years, we’ve seen actors such as Will Smith, Morgan Freeman, and Zoe Saldana take the lead roles, so it can’t be said that there are no non-white heroes, but there certainly isn’t many. Hollywood action movies, moreover than other genres, are typically loaded with an abundance of stereotypes. The way these movies are composed and structured can tell us a great deal about the views held within the American psyche and who holds the social power. The harsh reality is that the media ultimately sets the tone for societal standards, moralities, and images of our culture. Many consumers of media have never encountered some of the minorities or people of color shown on screen, so they subsequently depend on the media and wholeheartedly believe that the degrading stereotypes represented on the big screen are based on fact and not fiction. Mary Beltran said it best when she stated in her “Fast and Bilingual: Fast & Furious and the Latinization of Racelessness” article, “ultimately, Fast & Furious mobilizes notions of race in contradictory ways. It reinforces Hollywood traditions of white centrism, reinforcing notions of white male master while also dramatizing the figurative borders crossed daily by culturally competent global youth – both Latino and non-Latino” (77). This paper will specifically look...
To the viewers, the depiction of women as passive actors promotes a stereotypic acknowledgement that women are less capable than men. Third, in analyzing the gender representation, the theorist, Laura Mulvey, illustrates that western cinema is sexist and only propagates sexist ideologies (Smith and Cook, 2012). The western cinema idolizes women as sexual figures that are communicated via a patriarchal system. The costume are often tight and showing the feminine curvy features to attract the male gaze (Kirkpatrick and Scott, 2015). Fourth, King（2008）has focused on the female representation in 291 “cop-action” film through using content analysis, and found female heroine are more likely romantically involved with the opposite gender than male characters.
Women have made progress in the film industry in terms of the type of role they play in action films, although they are still portrayed as sex objects. The beginning of “a new type of female character” (Hirschman, 1993, pg. 1). 41-47) in the world of action films began in 1976 with Sigourney Weaver, who played the leading role in the blockbuster film ‘Aliens’ as Lt. Ellen Ripley. She was the captain of her own spaceship, plus she was the one who gave out all the orders. Until then, men had always been the ones giving the orders; to see a woman in that type of role was outlandish.
Feminism is a movement that supports women equality within society. In relation to film, feminism is what pushes the equal representation of females in mainstream films. Laura Mulvey is a feminist theorist that is famous for touching on this particular issue of how men and women are represented in movies. Through her studies, she discovered that many films were portraying men and women very differently from reality. She came up with a theory that best described why there is such as huge misrepresentation of the social status quos of male and female characters. She believed that mainstream film is used to maintain the status quo and prevent the realization of gender equality. This is why films are continuously following the old tradition that males are dominant and females are submissive. This is the ideology that is always present when we watch a movie. This is evident in the films from the past but also currently. It is as if the film industry is still catering to the male viewers of each generation in the same way. Laura Mulvey points out that women are constantly being seen as sexual objects, whether it is the outfits they wear or do not wear or the way they behave, or secondary characters with no symbolic cause. She states that, “in traditional exhibitionist role women are simultaneously looked at and displayed, with their appearance coded for strong visual and erotic impact so that they can be said to connote it-be-looked-at-ness.”(Mulvey pg. 715). Thus, women are nevertheless displayed as nothing more than passive objects for the viewing pleasure of the audience. Mulvey also points out through her research that in every mainstream movie, there is ...