State Building Controversy

1669 Words4 Pages

In this essay I will contend that ‘shared sovereignty’—as outlined by Stephen Krasner—can overcome the main obstacles of statebuilding. However, to increase the likelihood of success, I posit it is necessary for this ‘shared sovereignty’ to be based in principles of republicanism. Statebuilding has been largely unsuccessful. This failure can be explained by two major, interrelated obstacles: statebuilding’s exogenous nature and prêt-à-porter tendencies. Both of these criticisms allude to the reality that external actors’ interests typically do not align with the host government’s. A ‘partnership’ where sovereignties are tied together for an indefinite period of time addresses these concerns by assuring that the weak or failed state and the external body have agreed sufficiently on their end goals to enter into this relationship. This shared sovereignty and statebuilding being bound to republican statebuilding assures that Western tendencies towards liberalism are appropriately moderated to merge with the sociopolitical customs of the specific state being built up. …show more content…

This criticism has two main elements: that the external actors’ interests do not directly align with those of the weak state and that exogenous conceptions of the state fail to see value in sub-state indigenous governing bodies. External influence on the statebuilding process is not inherently bad. In fact, some states are so weak in capacity that monopoly of violence and provision of goods does not make it past the capital city. Without external forces and training, these states with low funds would be incapable of fulfilling their

Show More
Related

  • Government In Cannery Row

    1487 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Government is a source of help for many people. Sometimes this grand of a government fails on us. Then people begin to struggle. However sometimes the government takes over our lives to help us. Not like a National Socialistic take over of our lives, but a socialistic. However, there are also many different types of ideologies that the government controls its people. The people of Cannery Row have created a socialist atmosphere to replace the government that has failed them.

    Read More

  • The Transformation of America

    1375 Words  | 3 Pages

    In no field other than politics does the justification for action often come from a noteworthy event and the true cause stays hidden behind the headlines. The United States’ transformation from a new state to a global superpower has been a methodical journey molded by international conditions (the global terrain for statecraft), the role of institutions and their programmed actions, and ultimately, the interests of actors (the protection of participants in making policy’s items and i...

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Stephen D. Krasner's Abiding Sovereignty

    2031 Words  | 5 Pages

    Stephen. D. Krasner is an International Relations Professor at Stanford University and a former director of Policy Planning at the United States Department of State. He is a neorealist who focuses on sovereignty and state structure, international regimes and weak state stabilisation. His theory is the product of contemporary times and projects a broad trajectory of ups and downs in the international state structure embedded with the chain of circumstances within the rigid framework of international relationships and effectively and efficiently analyses the reasons and remedies for the current state of being of the states. His major contributions are Sovereignty-organised Hypocrisy, Structural Conflict-Third world against the global liberalism and Defending National Interest.

    Read More

  • The Federal Government and its Role in the States

    608 Words  | 2 Pages

    The federal system is a very complex because it allocates responsibility to state and federal government. Our federal system is one which powers are divided by the central government and state government. They both act directly upon the citizens and must agree with constitutional changes. The division of power among the states and federal government is called federalism. In the past there have been smart president and leader that gave the federal government more power than the states. We have view our country shift powers among the states and central government.

    Read More

  • Does Nonviolence Work on a Large Scale?

    1807 Words  | 4 Pages

    Rethinking Violence: States and Non-state Actors in Conflict. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2010. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), EBSCOhost (accessed April 22, 2014).

    Read More

  • International Relations And Global Politics

    1605 Words  | 4 Pages

    Perhaps one of the most frequently discussed topics in international relations today is the diminishing power of the nation state and subsequent growth of a global economy. Traditionally, the state is considered to play a leading role in global affairs; however, due to advances in communications technology and the expansion of international trade following the Cold War, the world has seen the establishment of an increasing number of non-state actors in global politics. The shift away from a state-centric model of international government has produced many positive changes to global politics, but has also highlighted many issues and challenges. Through examination of the role of international organizations in resolving crises, the effectiveness and legitimacy (or lack thereof) of new methods of global governance, the achievability of global governance, and the interconnectivity of states and non-state actors in regards to global affairs, it can be determined that the state is no longer the most powerful actor in global politics. Non-state actors, particularly international organizations such as the United Nations (UN) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), have become just as powerful, if not more powerful, than states.

    Read More

  • Political Realism

    2261 Words  | 5 Pages

    People’s ideas and assumptions about world politics shape and construct the theories that help explain world conflicts and events. These assumptions can be classified into various known theoretical perspectives; the most dominant is political realism. Political realism is the most common theoretical approach when it is in means of foreign policy and international issues. It is known as “realpolitik” and emphasis that the most important actor in global politics is the state, which pursues self-interests, security, and growing power (Ray and Kaarbo 3). Realists generally suggest that interstate cooperation is severely limited by each state’s need to guarantee its own security in a global condition of anarchy. Political realist view international politics as a struggle for power dominated by organized violence, “All history shows that nations active in international politics are continuously preparing for, actively involved in, or recovering from organized violence in the form of war” (Kegley 94). The downside of the political realist perspective is that their emphasis on power and self-interest is their skepticism regarding the relevance of ethical norms to relations among states.

    Read More

  • Communitarianism vs. Cosmopolitanism

    1136 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...t state autonomy cannot be restricted by anything but the community (state) itself. As one might assume, it follows from these differing standpoints that the way each theory view intervention, etc., will be in opposition. (Steve Smith, The Globalisation of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations p. 173A)

    Read More

  • Characteristics of the Modern Nation-State

    1609 Words  | 4 Pages

    This essay will describe the characteristics of the modern nation-state, explain how the United States fits the criteria of and functions as a modern nation-state, discuss the European Union as a transnational entity, analyze how nation-states and transnational entities engage on foreign policy to achieve their interests, and the consequences of this interaction for international politics.

    Read More

  • Four Characteristics Of Population, Territory, Sovereignty And Government

    1445 Words  | 3 Pages

    The first distinction is between states that fail because of a lack of relevant capacities and those that fail to promote the interests of all their inhabitants through political choice, often with the intention of benefiting the incumbent regime and its supporters at the expense of another group within the state. Robert Mugabe’s ongoing manipulation of ZANU—PF and state power in Zimbabwe is a paradigmatic example of a regime, choosing to deny basic rights to certain segments of its population in an attempt to bolster regime security. The dynamics in this case are somewhat different from instances where a regime may well want to restore order to part of its territory but lacks the relevant capacities to do so. These dynamics are apparent in, for instance, the Ugandan control of formal and/or informal markets. In this view, weak or failing state institutions provide an environment from which such warlords and ‘spoilers’ can profit. The third set of contingent factors concerns the political economy of state failure, especially the adoption by governments of ‘bad’ macroeconomic policies resulting in fiscal deficits and balance of payments crises, and the paradoxical effects of structural adjustment policies encouraged by a variety of international donors. As Nicolas van de Walle has argued, both of these factors encouraged a ‘hollowing out’ of the state which, in turn, increased ‘the chances that minor political incidents and disputes could cause the descent into failure.’ Such political economies did not, however, automatically produce failed states. Hence, although Zaire/the DRC

    Read More

  • Strategic Partnership Case Study

    1177 Words  | 3 Pages

    “structural collaboration between states (or other ‘actors’) to take joint advantage of economic opportunities, or to respond to security challenges

    Read More

  • Realism and the Concepts of Collective Security and Defense

    2303 Words  | 5 Pages

    Realism as defined, actually applies to pretty much anything. Whether discussing science, mathematics, ethics, or politics, the nature and application of realism can be applied. As such, it is essential therefore to narrow down the scope of individual study on realism. For the purpose of this paper, the focus will remain on realism solely in terms of its application to International Relations of which it is seemingly the most dominant of theories.1 Also called “Political Realism”, its antithesis is generally considered to be Liberalism. Political Realism stresses the conflicting and competitive nature required of states that seek to remain stable and positively ever evolving. Adversely, Liberalism suggests the necessity of cooperation amongst states.2 The defining factor therefore in Realism is the ever present necessity of a state to look out for its own well-being while promoting its...

    Read More

  • An Ideology And Liberalism In International Relations

    1771 Words  | 4 Pages

    But the decelerating of commercial development that grasped most Western states commencing in the mid-1970s gave a weighty trial to present liberalism. By the conclude of that decade commercial inactivity, joined alongside the price of maintaining the communal benefits of the welfare state, shoved powers increasingly in the direction of politically untenable levels of taxation and climbing debt. Equally fretting was the fact that the Keynesian economics rehearsed by countless powers seemed to lose its effectiveness. Powers endured to expend money on plans aimed at invigorating commercial development, but the consequence too frequently was increased inflation and ever-smaller drops in joblessness rates. Most international countries today have benefited positively for liberalism as it contributed in building the economies of different states (Fawcett, 2015:402).Peace and security, this large subject span, the established core agenda of global relations, is oftentimes perceived as tear amid realism and liberalism. Realism provides the framework for standard protection studies, liberalism for ‘alternative’ ways such as concord research. The preceding, crudely speaking, is distressed alongside maintaining order across coercion, the latter with ascertaining the underlying fights by coordinating governmental existence

    Read More

  • The Conflict Between the Ukraine and Russia

    1600 Words  | 4 Pages

    Globalization has effect the role of the state immensely; as the process of present’s challenges to state sovereignty and autonomy. In spite of borders becoming more ill-defined and fluid in as a result of the process of globalization (Weiss 2000, 2-3). The state will remain relevant and necessary because citizens need a place to cast their votes, taxes have to be paid to particular authorities, which can be held accountable for pub...

    Read More

  • What is State Formation and How Does It Occur?

    1329 Words  | 3 Pages

    In order to answer the question concerning the formation of states, it is necessary to clarify what constitutes a state; the Oxford English Dictionary defines a state as ‘a nation or territory considered as an organized political community under one government’. There are a number of ways and processes in which to analyse what state formation is, why they have formed and the way in which this has occurred. State emergence can be traced back to the creation of territorial boundaries in medieval Europe, such as the Peace of Westphalia in 1648, and its transition to a modern state can be attributed to the introduction of gunpowder in war (Hague & Harrop, 2010: 64). The formations of states have also been influenced by the growth of bureaucracy, administration and organisations. There are different theories as to the reason why states form, a certain few of which can be divided into the categories of rationalist, culturalist and structuralist perspectives. In this essay, these perspectives shall enter the debate in trying to justify the reason for state formation and the way in which it occurs. The most prominent feature in the formation of states appears to be the prevention and engagement of a state in war and its following consequences.

    Read More

More about State Building Controversy

Open Document