Stanley And Blanche Comparison

1115 Words3 Pages

In many pieces of literature, two contradicting sides often play a major role in story and character development; Tennessee Williams is able to apply this concept in A Streetcar Named Desire. The characters of Stanley and Blanche can be easily identified as polar opposites of each other. Blanche is a complex, sophisticated character, while Stanley can be seen as primal, simple, and sometimes animalistic. Tennessee Williams is able to use the opposition of Blanche and Stanley to build the rest of the story and characters. When looking at the character of Blanche, it can be easily seen that she is deeper than many of the characters in the arrangement. Blanche is able to put on a disguise to hide her troubling past, which she tries desperately …show more content…

Stella seems to blinded by her love with Stanley, which seems like a strange thing to Blanche. They go back and forth; Stella describing the different times Stanley goes on a row and Blanche repeatedly asks if she views this as all right. Blanche eventually tells Stella that she can still get out of the dangerous marriage (Williams 63-4). It may seem easier to notice things when looked at from an outside viewpoint, which is the point of view that Blanche takes up. Blanche is not only able to open Stella’s eyes a little bit, but also the eyes of readers. Many see Stella running back to Stanley as foolish, which helps to develop the character of Stella and add to the …show more content…

When Stanley finds out that Blanche lost Belle Reve, he immediately accuses her of attempting to trick their family out of the land. “It looks to me like you have been swindled, baby, and when you’re swindled under the Napoleonic code I’m swindled too. And I don’t like to be swindled” (Williams 35). Immediately after this accusation, Stanley also notices that Blanche’s possessions would not match her salary, which further justifies his accusation in his mind. Instead of calmly asking Blanche about her situation, he jumps to conclusions and goes into a fit; this shows his simple, quick-draw nature of acting first then questioning

Open Document