Sojourner Truth Vs. Anna Cooper

997 Words2 Pages

Whilst men and women are said to be equal under the law, studies show that, on average, for every dollar men make, women make 79 cents. How does this payment gap show equality and justice? At a national conference held in Ohio, in December 1851, a male attendee spoke out against the idea of equal rights for women. He argued that women are too weak and are physically, mentally, and morally inferior to men. His comment caught the attention of of two women, Sojourner Truth and Anna Cooper, who both responded with their own speeches on the roles of women. Although both women convey similar messages about the infelicity of discriminating against gender, race, or condition, Truth uses logic to prove that she is as worthy as men, conveys her pain …show more content…

At first, Cooper explains the advantages of equality, because “the acquirement of [women’s] ‘rights’ will mean the final triumph of all right over might, the supremacy of the moral forces of reason, and justice and love in the government of the nations of earth” (Cooper). This shows that if she can advocate for women’s rights, the rights of all people will be able to be guaranteed. Her use of reasoning appeals to the audience because they realize that she makes a good point by addressing the positive outcomes of equality. Like Sojourner Truth, Cooper’s logic is used to sway the audience into advocating for equal rights. Furthermore, Cooper racks up more attention by speaking on behalf of all people because if women achieve their rightful justice, universal equality will be ensured for “not the white woman's, nor the black woman's, nor the red woman's, but the cause of every man and woman who has writhed silently under a mighty wrong” (Cooper). This arouses the emotions in the audience because they are swayed by Cooper’s statement. If she is willing to fight for the rights of all factions, it would be fair that she earns respect and honor for her efforts. This is different from Truth’s appeal to pathos because Truth made her audience feel empathetic while Cooper encourage her audience to become supportive and unbiased. Cooper’s last effort is aimed towards confronting the flaws of inequality to prove her reliability. By using a real life example, Cooper’s argument becomes more reliable. To argue against injustice, she compares it to a chain and “If one link of the chain is broken, the chain is broken” (Cooper). This means that if all humans are not granted equality, society is disconnected and

Open Document