Socioeconomics In The Great Gatsby

1134 Words3 Pages

Socioeconomics are the study of the economic activity and how it could be influenced by society. The idea that the economy has the ability to be improved by society was called social progress. The Great Gatsby had a lot of social progress shown through how the main characters, Nick Carraway, Jordan Baker, Jay Gatz, Tom and Daisy Buchanan, and Myrtle Wilson, all lived in their Long Island houses. Part of that social progress was beneficial to their economy and some had been harmful to it too. Socioeconomics in The Great Gatsby are illustrated through different interactions between the characters like Daisy & Gatsby, Myrtle & Tom, Nick & Jordan, in addition to the places they called home. Daisy and Gatsby's relationship was majorly based on …show more content…

They were proof that not all relationships were centered on money or the society norms. Jordan Baker was a well known golfer who stayed at Daisy's when Nick first went over to Daisy's house to visit (Fitzgerald 18). Nick was a bond man who lived in a small house at West Egg, right next to Gatsby's mansion (Fitzgerald 5). It never bothered each other that one was a famous golfer or that the other lived in a small house, their relationship continued to blossom through the whole novel up until the end (Fitzgerald 80). The end of their relationship was mutual because they had both found something that disgusted the other (Fitzgerald 177). Jordan said that Nick was dishonest and that she made a careless mistake to date him (Fitzgerald 177). Nick on the other hand, still loved her and thought that it was best to leave because she seemed to have had no reaction to hearing about the death of Gatsby (Fitzgerald 176-177). Jordan's first reaction to the break up was to say "that she was engaged to another man"(Fitzgerald 177). She commented this because in the upperclass it would be unusual to be the one to be broken up with. Especially since Nick did not live in a luxurious house like Daisy (Fitzgerald 5). There was a little bit of economic status that caused the break up, but it was not as dominant in this relationship as some

Open Document