Slavery And Symbolism In Forrest Myth

798 Words2 Pages

Nathan Bedford Forrest as a symbol and a figure has been popular in novels and movies, with settings from the West, Reconstruction, or even the post-World War II South, far out-stripping his impact on the Civil War itself. Most of these works build upon aspects of the Forrest Myth, such as the novel which has Rommel coming to Mississippi in 1937 to study Forrest’s battles, only to use these tactics in North Africa. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- March 4, 1861, President Abraham Lincoln stated that he had "no purpose, directly, or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it exists. I believe I lack lawful right to do, so, and I lack the inclination to do so." The attempts by overzealous generals such as John C. Fremont and David Hunter to free the slaves in the areas they occupied were promptly countermanded by Lincoln. The person in the White House had enough problems without pushing slave-owning Union loyalist in the critical border states into the arms of secessionists ------------------------------------------------------------------------- March 1865, Judah P. Benjamin, Confederate Secretary of State, promised freedom for blacks who served from the Virginia. Authority …show more content…

Forrest’s wholesale slaughter of troops (mostly black) at Fort Pillow tarred any national reputation he might have had forever. But his raiding prowess earned him the respect of his black soldiers, and his benevolent protection over Confederate civilians earned him massive esteem in the post-war South. His leadership and later rejection of the Klu Klux Klan allowed him to be represented as a racial moderate in reconstruction; his reconciliation and support of Memphis’ blacks in the 1870s causes the historian and the myth-maker even further

Open Document