Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The myth of the sisyphus essay
The myth of the sisyphus essay
The myth of the sisyphus essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The myth of the sisyphus essay
The French philosopher ponders the Sisyphus’ fate in his renowned work The Myth of Sisyphus. This story of a god whom, in death, was required to complete the utterly meaningless task of pushing a large boulder to the top of a mountain over and over again, only to have it roll back to the bottom before the completion of his task. What could cause him to deserve such a fate? For the purposes of our metaphor suffice it to say that Sisyphus dared challenge the powers of Zeus, the king of the Gods. Much like the Burmese people who have long challenged those they’ve viewed as the oppressors, they’ve been forced to push the boulder of Democracy to the top of the mountain, time and time again. More so, their struggle alone has been enough to lead some Burmese people to fulfilling lives, even if they will never see the end result.
However, unlike Sisyphus’ fate, the Burmese are not permanently relegated to oppression and subjugation to the elite – their suffering has been extensive and brutal – but it is not permanent. Examining the plight of the Burmese people however, is not a simple task either. Which Burmese people? While this is not an examination of the most oppressed people of Burma, as all of them have had incredibly
…show more content…
The Burmese at this time were tired of the British subjugation and disrespect towards their culture. They were equally irritated with Burmese Indians, who were still avid supporters of British rule. Aung San became the face of the independence movement, and pushed back against British ruled as the Premier of the British Colony of Burma from 1946 – 1947. Unfortunately Aung San would never see an independent Burma come to fruition – as he was assassinated six months prior, while meeting with aids planning the transition to Independence. His death was a tragedy, and he is a hero still to many Burmese people and hailed as the single most important figure in the Independence movement of
Throughout history, tyrants have ruled most of the populated world. These were people who held executive power in their community, and ruled with a fierce and rapacious grip, doing their will without paying their dues. These rulers can be seen through time in many different times and nations: Fidel Castro, Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin (“Dictators and Tyrants in World History”). All of these tyrants ruled as the gods did, with an iron grip, holding the promise of demise over them in the case of insurgency. In Greek and Roman myths, their gods are painted as impeccable examples of a tyrant, commanding of the humans that they do there will at threat of death. For this purpose the gods were worshipped as Stalin was, through acute fear of their
This bold sentence serves as an attention grabber as it challenges a common dogma once stated by John Dalberg, “ Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” By making this brief but, powerful statement, Aung Sang Suu Kyi surprises her audience by blaming them for the corruption of the government making her audience more keen to understand her point of view. Aung Sang Suu Kyi then directs her words towards her Burmese people as she alludes to specific words such as “ Chanda- gati”, “Dosa-gati”, “Bhaya-gati” and “ Chanda-gati” (Kyi, 1) to explain the corruption of her land in the words of her people. This builds ethos as she can connect to her people and clearly explain how “chanda-gati” or the corruption built by fear is the most dangerous form of corruption. She can then further explain how the only way to root out the corruption of the Burmese Army and gain freedom is to first eradicate the people's fear of the government and instill confidence in the basic human rights of the Burmese
The state of power established through the imperialistic backdrop show that Orwell should have control over the Burmese. Orwell is a British colonial officer in Burma, which is under the control of the British, and because of this he should have authority and control over the Burmans. The presence of the empire is established when Orwell explains that, “with one part of my mind I thought of the British Raj as an unbreakable tyranny...upon the will of the prostrate people; with another part I thought that the greatest joy in the world would be to drive a bayonet into a Buddhist priest’s gut.” (144) This ideal imperialistic circumstance, where ...
In his works, The Stranger (The Outsider) and Myth of Sisyphus, Camus addresses the consciousness of Meursault and Sisyphus through their fate.
The Allegory of the Cave, and The Myth of Sisyphus, are both attempts at explaining some aspect of the way people think or why humans do as observed. Both stories illustrate the same idea: without necessary and proper exposure to change, thinking is limited and ignorance is the direct product.
Taylor is careful to identify exactly which features of Sisyphus predicament account for the lack of meaning. He argues that the facts that Sisyphus task is both difficult and endless are irrelevant to its meaninglessness. What explains the meaninglessness of Sisyphus’s life is that all of his work amounts to nothing. One way that Sisyphus’s life could have meaning, Taylor proposes, is if something was produced of his struggles. For example, if the stone that he rolls were used to create something that would last forever then Sisyphus would have a meaningful life. Another separate way in which meaning might be made present is if Sisyphus had a strong compulsion for rolling the stone up the hill. Taylor points out, though, that even given this last option, Sisyphus’s life has not acquired an objectives meaning of life; there is still nothing gained besides the fact he just ...
Through this we see that the author’s point of view is someone who understands that the events that took place that morning in Burma, were not humane and degrading.
Several philosophers have made differing viewpoints regarding the outlook of life. Richard Taylor and Albert Camus are notably known for presenting their thoughts on whether life is meaningless or not through the use of the Greek myth of Sisyphus. The two philosopher’s underlying statement on the meaning of life is understood through the myth. The myth discusses the eternal punishment of Sisyphus who was condemned by the Gods to take a large boulder up a hill, only to have it roll back down, forcing him to repeat this task endlessly. Each conceive the myth in their own way and ultimately end with a conclusion that differs from each other. Taylor’s ideals and his take on the meaning of life contrast with what Camus presents in his argument. While Taylor suggests that there is a subjective meaning to life, Camus states that life is ultimately meaningless.
Despite the fact that the Rohingya have been settled in Myanmar since 15th century, According to the council on Foreign Relations, the government takes the position that they are not native to Myanmar. They see the Rohingya as foreigners who traveled to the region during British occupation for work, and while many did come during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, a vast majority had already been settled for centuries. Recently, it has come to the attention of the global community that the government of Myanmar has enacted violence against these people and their communities, leaving many to flee into neighboring Bangladesh. There has been much debate over whether or not the actions of the government of Myanmar towards these people could be classified as a genocide. With the help of increasing media coverage, more countries are acknowledging the issues that the Rohingya face, although the term genocide has not yet been placed officially on the events. This is all despite the fact that the goals of these actions is very clearly to rid Myanmar of these people, either by killing them or
...defeating the Japanese, the British agreed in 1947 to grant the Burmese complete independence within a year. On January 4th of 1948, Burma would become an independent country.
Over time, Westerners came in contact with the natives. In the book Burmese Days by George Orwell, the author tells the story of the Western dominance in Burma. During the early 20th Century, the British Westerners gained control of Burman civilizations. A group of about ten British individuals maintain control of over 2,000 natives. Each character has different reasons and methods for wanting control. The locals accepted European dominance because the Europeans had strategies to legitimize their dominance. The local Burmese people viewed the Europeans in different ways. Elizabeth, Mr. and Mrs. Lakersteen, Dr. Veraswami, U Po Kyin, and Ma Hla May all have specialized reasons for maintaining
At the centre of the existential angst, dominating the great movements of life, there lays an essential absurdity. England in the aftermath of the two wars inherited this absurdity that upheld the human predicament in a world where “nobody thinks, nobody cares. No beliefs, no convictions and no enthusiasm.” Camus in The Myth of Sisyphus diagnoses humanity’s plight as purposeless in an existence out of harmony with its surroundings. This irrationality and pointlessness of experience is transferred to the stage where by all semblance of logical construction and all intellectually viable argument is abundant. In the same strain, developed the Angry Plays of the Theatre of the Absurd. Beckett, Adamor and Pinter with the difference of attempting
The hero of Burma was born on June 19, 1945 in Yangon, Myanmar, a country traditionally known as Burma. Her father, Aung San was the de facto prime minister of British. He played a major role in helping Burma win independence from the British in 1948. Unfortunately, he was assassinated on July 19, 1947 before Burma became independent. Her mother, Daw Khin Kyi, was also active in politics before and after being married. In 1960, her mother was appointed as Burmese ambassador to India. “From her father she developed a sense of duty to her country, and from her mother, who never spoke of hatred for her husband 's killers, she learned forgiveness” (Parenteau). The name of Burma’s hero is Aung San Suu Kyi also known as The Lady. Aung San Suu Kyi played a vital role in fighting to establish a democratic government and human rights at Burma now known as Myanmar.
In Buddhism’s most basic principles, it is understood that all beings have a right to live, life should respected and people should refrain from taking all life. Yet, currently in the country of Myanmar, extreme Buddhist monks are preaching religious superiority and leading a genocide on Myanmar’s minority religious people, especially Muslims, down to the women and children. To make matters worse Myanmar’s governing officials (exclusively Buddhist) have passed laws that assist in the persecution of minorities. There are some local reports that government authorities are tracking down and arresting religious minorities without reason. Then those who are arrested haven’t been seen or heard from since. With the known death toll of Myanmar Muslims and other minority groups increasing and the Myanmar government publicly admitting to “misplacing” huge numbers of people who fall into the religious minority, suspicions that the Myanmar government is assisting in this religious genocide have justifiably
Pugh, C.L. (2013) 'Is Citizenship the Answer? Constructions of belonging and exclusion for the stateless Rohingya of Burma.', p. 3.