Similarities Between Radley And To Kill A Mockingbird

820 Words2 Pages

To Kill a Mockingbird, written by Harper Lee, then later adapted into a black and white picture film in 1962. The story portrays a young girl's experience during the Great Depression within a racist, segregated society. The texts, also centres around the young girl’s struggles with growing up, as she not only tries to understand and process the trial, but also wrestles with the expectations people have of her. Both versions of text are representations of the concept of innocence through the embodiment of Jean Louise ‘Scout’ Finch and Arthur Radley (Boo): In the film the audience is mainly exposed to the representation of Jem’s innocence rather than the depiction of Scout, whereas, in the novel she is portrayed as a ‘slow coming child’. This …show more content…

This further creates a concept of innocence for the readers as Scout is an adult when she tells the story but it's from the point of view of a child. As the reader really pictures the children growing up, Scout learns from multiple characters such as Atticus and Calpurnia, her teacher and Miss Maudie these perspectives and concepts of Scout could not have been made without the use of narrative voice. Specifically seen, when Boo lays a blanket over Scout (chapter 8)-Miss Maudie house fire scene. This is seen through Scouts eyes as an eye opener as she is made to brighten her dark persona on Boo- who is mainly depicted as a lunatic. Whereas, the film chooses to cut this scene out to focus more on Jem’s perspective rather than focus on Scout and Boo’s relationship. Therefore, to have Scout narrating throughout the film as she does in the book would prove distracting, so Scout as narrator is only presented to set the mood of the beginning scene in the film. As a result, viewers don't get a strong sense of Scout's first-person narration as they do in the book; instead, they simply notice the childlike perspective portrayed in the story through actions and language. Although both versions of to kill a mockingbird have established the loss of innocence Lee has developed a much clearer …show more content…

Boo and Scouts relationship is the most sufficient relationship to emit the conceptualization of innocence through curiosity within the film. This is proven when Scout walks Boo home after his heroic deeds, saving the Finch children; she lets go of his hands as she walks away in this scene the camera zooms into to this to effectively demonstrate scouts loss of innocence. Scout is letting go of her youthful innocence - Boo's hand, as she is now more so grown up, after the events that have occurred in her life. Conversely, lee depicts scouts perspective of Boo as a rebellious teenager who was incarcerated, and holds the Scout, Jem and Dill’s curiosity. This is seen when scout reiterates one of Atticus’s wise phrases, 'Atticus was right. One time he said you never really know a man until you stand in his shoes and walk around in them' (pg. 308). This is seen as, Scout’s final acceptance of Atticus as a father figure rather than an authority figure as he would usually distinguish them from going near the Radley home, he let her now ‘walk in his shoes’. This meaning is created as scout is seen walking him home is a way of Lee reiterating her thoughts on Scout and Boo’s relationship. In contrast, the novel has better represented the innocence concept through

Open Document