Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Standardized testing impact on schools
Negative impact of standardized testing
Effects of standardized tests in elementary and secondary schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Standardized testing impact on schools
Why Education Is Important
Should we be able to know where our taxes go? Yes because, in today's society most people do not know where their taxes go. They just know they pay them at the beginning of every year. People should be able to know where their taxes go, so we know that it actually is going to be used to help schools. That's why I believe our family taxes should go towards children education. Only fifty-five percent of people pay their taxes and forty-five percent do not even pay their taxes. This matters because the money from taxes should be helping teachers and students. At the beginning of the school year, teachers have a hard time about buying the essentials for their classroom. This is the reason they send a supply list to our parents and legal guardians to help the teachers but also help children
…show more content…
These tests have been elevated as a tool for students, schools, and teachers. They are driving our good teachers to leave their profession, that they have worked hard to get. With the standardized testing kids may not be good test takers and the grades on the test may reflect that one subject of the matter but not the other. In that case, schools are spending huge amount of money on standardized testing; later on that money needs to go to the schools to buy updated textbooks to actually teach the children what they need to know. Countless teachers have to eliminate projects and activities that provide students with an opportunity to be creative and imaginative. Therefore I feel our students need more one on one tutoring to help the children. Standardized tests are not helping get students and young adults ready for college. These tests are costing many schools at the most $1.7 million dollars. This could be money we can keep back for the school. I think we should consider cutting out the tests. Including spending the money on equipment they could use for the public and private
According to Fyona Rose, “Not only do these tests belittle students' and teachers' hard work, they also leave them with negative feelings toward school and drain their love of learning” (Rose, 2015). This means that standardized testing can ruin the enjoyment of learning for both students and teachers. The reason standardized testing still happens is because it has become a standard for schools each year. But if the standard is bad something should be changed. Many who do not like standardized testing to do not believe that testing should be done away with, but rather be changed to accommodate the growing needs of society as a
This is precisely the problem. Standardized tests are old and outdated, and the harm they cause to America’s education system by far outweighs the benefits. These tests were intended to monitor and offer ways to improve how public schools function, but instead they have impaired the natural learning ability of students and imposed upon the judgment of experienced educators. Although a means to evaluate the progress of public schools is necessary, it is also necessary to develop more modern and effective ways of doing so. Standardized testing mandated by the federal and state governments has a negative effect on the education of America’s youth.
Tax season is upon us and many Americans are scrambling around trying to get theirs finished by the end of the dead line. This time of year is not a joyous occasion, everyone on edge most of them pondering how much they will have to pay. While others are wondering if they will get as much as they thought they will, or are they going to be one of the unlucky few to be audited? I am one of those people, anxious, and waiting at the edge of my seat for that hammer of reality to come crashing down over my head. With each new election year comes new arguments and battles fought within the halls of Capital Hill, but who is right and is there a middle ground? I will present you with the facts as I have found them; the choice is yours to determine what is right and what is wrong.
Standardized tests compare students in different states, districts, and schools. The comparisons lead to “unhealthy competition among the schools” (Pros and Cons 2). In the article, “Pros and Cons of Standardized Testing,” it is stated that “Federal funds are given only to those that perform well” (2). This makes the pressures in schools very high and makes the schools evaluate the performance of the teachers and students constantly. “Low scores can prevent a student from progressing to the next grade level or lead to teacher firings and school closures, while high scores ensure continued federal and local funding and are used to reward teachers and administrators with bonus payments” (Use of Standardized Tests 5). Standardized tests give parents a good idea of how well their students are doing and learning. It also leads to exaggerated reports of success. In Jonathan Pollard’s article he says “Consider this passage taken directly from Kohn’s book:” Then it states how when a test is first administered and scores are low, headlines are bad. Then in a few years the scores go up and the headlines are good. Finally, the scores level off or they substitute a new test and the scores drop. Causing the headlines to be bad again. Kohn then states that “This is not due to a change in the competency of teachers, or level of instruction. This is simply the process of students and teachers acclimating to the tests” (Pollard 4).
When compared to military (54% of the FDR), education only accounts for about 6% of federal spending, which amounts to around 70 billion dollars. According to the Congressional Budget Office that money is then allocated to the states where in some cases it may only cover “10% of the state’s total educational costs”. If funds were allocated from defense to education the federal government could relieve what is for some states a 90% burden of coverage of federally regulated schools. Funds could be used to increase teacher pay, reduce school crowding, and give states with a smaller budget increased funding towards there school systems. In addition to improvements in education this same concept could be applied to other areas of the public sector like infrastructure. Improving areas within Federal Infrastructure also has the economic benefit of job creation in construction and maintenance, as well as safer road systems and infrastructure for the American people. Excessive government spending in the Defense Budget is therefore irresponsible as money could be better utilized in areas of the public sector that would directly improve the lives of the American
Standardized tests should not be used to measure student proficiency. These tests are becoming much more challenging and high stakes, resulting in a significant amount of stress and anxiety in students. Standardized testing has become a huge weight on students which is leading to test anxiety. Jasmine Evans writes in her article “Problems With Standardized Testing,” from Education.com about critics of the No Child Left Behind, an act passed in 2001 one under the administration of George W. Bush, who say that there is a lot of pressure on teachers, students, and parents, and school officials as a result of these tests. They say the pressure to...
This is a very delicate question and the answer can be different for everyone. Many hard working Americans feel as if taxes are legal ways for the government to take their hard earned money from them. People work hard for their money, so it is expected that many would feel uneasy when their own government ends up taking a decent sized chunk out of every paycheck. It doesn't seem right, but, once people understand where this money is actually going, these taxes could be more easily accepted. Although, some people will never see the importance of taxes. After all, one of the greatest campaign strategies of many politicians includes the promise of lowered taxes, and this pleases many Americans. This is exactly why we need taxes. Without them, we wouldn't have the necessary funds to keep our government stable, nor enough people willing to contribute their money to the government, and without a stable government, our country would be
Standardized testing caters to one population of people and one style of learning. These tests are supposed to measure if you are on your grade level but can be extremely ineffective. I remember taking the SAT and them asking questions that I did not know how to solve and it was so long that it made me not want to take it. This creates a problem for students because they figure why take a test I know I am going to fail and that take hours to take. The success rate for that is very low. These tests cater to people that a tolerant enough to sit down for hour and comprehend the work in one particular way but everyone is not tolerant enough for it. Just like one of my old professor said everyone learns and comprehends and has tolerance for a lot of things but taking a test that is four hours long with work that you can’t comprehend because you don’t have enough time to think in that particular section is not fair to every stud...
The world is no longer concerned with educating whole human beings, but instead, it is focused on collecting “data.” “Standardized testing robs students and teachers of using their creativity and critical thinking. It holds everyone accountable for meeting this one standard when that is nearly impossible to do. It turns us into robots, dehumanizing both teachers and students.” (Gettysburg College, 1) Standardized test are given to schools by the government. The problem with that is that the government is not in the classroom with students every day. They do not know what the students need. Standardized testing takes away time from student learning experiences where they are not able to think critically or be creative. Standardized tests take place in an artificial learning environment. They are timed, students are not allowed to ask questions, use references, talk to another student, and they cannot even get up and move around. All of these things do not mirror the reality of the real world at all. These tests are reducing the richness of human experience and human learning to a number/ set of numbers. A student may have a deep knowledge of a particular subject, but receive no acknowledgement for it because their test score may have been low. Maybe if students could draw a picture, lead a group discussion, or make a hands-on project, they could show all the knowledge that they really have. They cannot do any of these things in a standardized test. As stated before, testing also creates “winners” and losers.” The “winners” get to move on with their life, but the “losers” often suffer from loss of self-esteem and the damage of “low expectations.” Standardized tests do not value diversity either. There are a wide range of differences in the people who take standardized tests. People have different cultural backgrounds, different levels of proficiency in the English language, different learning and thinking styles, different
The National Education Association (NEA) conducted a survey, wherein teachers were asked various questions about the impact standardized testing has had in their classrooms. According to Tim Walker, “Forty-two percent of the surveyed teachers reported that the emphasis on improving standardized test scores had a ‘negative impact’ on their classroom, while only 15 percent said the impact was ‘positive,’” (para.5). According to this survey, fifty-two percent of teachers said that too much time on test prep, with it being estimated that the average teacher spends about thirty percent of class time focused on preparing for the test (Walker para.7). Despite the majority of teachers, the people who see the effects the most, reporting that standardized testing does significant harm to education, the results of the exams are still stressed far too much. It would appear that the stress on standardized testing has taken its toll on the educators, too, as forty-five percent of surveyed teachers reported that they had considered quitting due to the rising importance of standardized testing and their results (Walker para.
Standardized testing is not the best way to measure how well a teacher teaches or how much a student has learned. Schools throughout the United States put their main focus on standardized tests; these examinations put too much pressure on the teachers and students and cause traumatizing events. Standardized testing puts strain on teachers and students causing unhealthy occurrences, Common Core is thrown at teachers with no teaching on how to teach the new way which dampers testing scores for all students, and the American College Test determines whether a child gets into college or not based on what they have learned during high school. Standardized tests are disagreeable; tests should not determine ranking of people.
All students must pass standardized tests in order to graduate. Standardized tests are not going to make us smart, so why is the government spending all their money on those tests? According to Quinn Mulholland, Author at Harvard Political Review "Teaching to the test" is replacing good teaching practices with "drill n ' kill" rote learning.” Students learn better if they’re being taught by a teacher who teaches a subject that he or she is passionate about. On the other hand, if teachers are told to teach students in order for students to pass tests then students are not learning, instead they are memorizing. Standardized tests won’t make students ready for college. Standardized tests will not improve student achievement, it is an unreliable way to measure student success, and they are not objective. Standardized tests are also unfair to students whose English is their second language as well as students with special
This argument goes along with the other two mentioned and explained above. There isn’t much that is positive to say about these assessments. It places so much pressure on students to perform well and pressure on teachers to teach what is going to be on the test. This brings negative energy to classrooms. An article by Greg Jouriles helps explain why we don’t need these tests. He claims, “Standardized tests are unnecessary because they rarely show what we don’t already know” (Jouriles, Greg). He also goes on to explain that one’s test score isn’t reliable and that we should trust the teachers when grades are published. A school system can accurately judge the students in the school on what they are good at better than the standardized tests do. They can break down many different aspects of what students need to improve on and what they are already knowledgeable of. Students need to learn more than just the test information. Only studying and learning test material makes students less diverse and leads to boring lectures in the classroom. Another article written by an organization called Fairtest adds, “Some students simply do not test well. Many students are affected by test anxiety or do not show their learning well on a standardized test, resulting in inaccurately lower scores” (Fairtest). These tests punish students for what they can’t control, making them stressed and panicked that they won’t graduate or move on to the next grade. Some children are from low-income families attending schools with large classes with little to no materials for learning what is on the test. In addition to that, some teachers have never been educated on test content, which is not their fault, and this results in low-test scores. This all leads to why there are such negative feelings throughout classrooms of many
About 27 billion is collected each year for tax purposes that is why paying tax is harmful to most people in the world, therefore (TAXES MUST BE STOPPED), 71% of Americans don't get what their tax should cover, the government can legally utilize any property owned by you to pay off tax the government is manipulating its citizens. First, when a person doesn't pay off his tax the government can legally have ownership of their property to pay tax and that has caused 45% of Americans have gone homeless to make it worse if a person has debt on tax and couldn't pay because of his/her situation it will be automatically transferred to a family member therefore not paying tax won't only hurt you but also your family members, an example that had a similar situation to this has happened with actor/author '' Wesly Snipes'' his father died and was in debt which prompt Mr. Wesly paying 5 million, led to him announcing bankruptcy thi example shows how one person's problem can be another .
We see this every time we make a purchase, taxes are a part of everyday spending. Taxes come in many forms, from income tax, to sales tax, to property taxes. As citizens of the United States, it is a requirement for us to pay our due share, and this comes in the form of taxes. The impact from taxes grossly affects the both personal finances and the economy on a grand scale. So why does the government require us as citizens to pay taxes? Well according to the article why do you have to pay taxes?