Shinto The Way Home Analysis

1122 Words3 Pages

Shinto: The Way Home written by Thomas Kasulis is a book designed to inform the reader of Shinto traditions and history, but how does his work stand on its own as a scholarly source. Kasulis uses simple organization strategies to control the flow of the work the simplest method is the separation of the book into six chapters as well as a two prefaces one from the editor and one from the author. The first chapter discusses Shintoism in the terms of a western audience while the second chapter confers the connection with normal Japanese culture with Shinto traditions. The third, fourth, and the fifth chapter canvases the history of Shinto traditions in chronological order from prehistory to 2002. Chapter 6 explains Issues with Shinto in a modern …show more content…

The third chapter is about Shintoism during the prehistory to 1794 and discusses how the tradition was passed down and how Shintoism was fused with Buddhism since Shintoism was too simple to compare with Chinese Confucianism. Chapter four discusses Shinto history from 1794 to 1801 and is about how many Shinto philosophers tried to rewrite Shintoism to separate it from Buddhism. To continue the thought chapter 5 starts from 1801 to 2002 theorizes the Shinto separation leads to an imperialist mentality such as kamikaze pilots and World War 2. The final chapter six speculates the future of Shintoism after WW2 and the Yasukuni controversy plus the tug of a war battle between essentialist and existentialist Shintoism and the issues with vocabulary that both types of Shinto has.
This book can be a useful tool when researching Shintoism because it contains various topics in Shintoism. Since the second chapter discusses many Shinto practices in the modern context one can look at this book for the explanation of various beliefs, tradition, and Japanese culture. Maybe a researcher might want to learn about the history of Shintoism as a whole or how Shintoism was connected to Japanese imperialism. This piece is even a decent source of the Yasakuni shrine controversy in japan after WWII. Kasulis does a good job at explaining Shinto traditions and cultural …show more content…

He discusses the nature of Shintoism before writing and the justification of the emperor. To explain ancient Shinto practice he states “From this evidence most scholars speculate that the ancient Japanese were animists—that is, believers in spirits who operate in both the natural and human domains” (Kasulis, 75). In Shintoism for a long period of its life, it was fused with Buddhism and Kasulis explains this connection when he states “Emperor Shömu had already formally associated the Sun Buddha with Amaterasu, the Shinto sun kami” (Kasulis, 96). When it come to the Yasakuni shrine controversy he even covers that by saying “A second way in which the shrine officials goad their critics is the justifications they offer for such practices as the enshrinement of war criminals” (Kasulis, 146) he said this because the Yasakuni shrine enshrines all the Japanese soldiers that died in WWII even war

Open Document