Schoolteachers And Sumo Wrestlers

993 Words2 Pages

In “What do schoolteachers and sumo wrestlers have in common?” authors Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner compare teachers and sumo wrestlers because of the temptation to cheat that they both face. This story introduces the concept of incentives, or rather things that urge people to do the right thing more than they do the wrong thing. They use stories of a day care and a bagel selling man to explain different kinds of incentives and the effects they have on people.
A day care in Israel had an issue with tardy parents picking up their children at the end of the day so they imposed a late fee of $3 per incident. Instead of deterring parents from being late, the late pickups increased because the consequence was not severe enough. The fee …show more content…

Cheating is a way to get more by doing less. Chicago Public Schools implemented high stakes testing in all schools, measuring not only students’ progress but the schools themselves. This is all part of the No Child Left Behind law signed by President Bush (Levitt & Dunbar, 2009). Schools with low scores can be put on probation, shutdown, and teachers fired or reassigned. Students in the third, sixth and eighth grades had to test at a certain level in order to not be held back. The test is supposed to give students the incentive to study, but instead it seems to be giving teachers the incentive to cheat. If their students do well they are praised, promoted, and sometimes even given a monetary bonus. So teachers have found many different ways to cheat the system: give students extra time, teach to the test, fill in the blanks for students after they have left the room, or erase the wrong answers and fill in right …show more content…

How the wrestlers perform in competitions affect the way they live. The best wrestlers are taken care of by the lower ranking wrestlers. Each tournament, sumo wrestlers compete in 15 bouts. If a wrestler finishes with a record of 8 or better their ranking rises. It is believed that sumo wrestlers will lose purposefully if they have a record of 8-6 and an opponent has a record of 7-7 (Levitt & Dunbar, 2009). They might be offered a bribe, or lose in order to keep their opponent, a fellow elite sumo wrestler and friend, a part of the elite. There is data that mostly proves this theory true, but no disciplinary action has ever been taken against a sumo wrestler because it would put into question the honor of the

Open Document