Essay On Sandra Day O Connor

774 Words2 Pages

The Supreme Court is the highest judicial body in the United States. Since its creation in 1789, 112 justices have served on the Court. Of these 112 justices, four of them are women. President Ronald Reagan appointed the first female justice, Sandra Day O’Connor, in 1981; she served for 25 years. Sandra Day O’Connor changed the face of women in politics. Men dominated the Supreme Court yet Sandra Day O’Connor made strides in feminist politics and women's rights by breaking the glass ceiling in the legal profession. She offered an unbiased point of view on many topics including abortion rights, the death penalty, and affirmative action. O’Connor was born on March 26th, 1930 in Texas. She graduated Stanford University in 1950, where she studied …show more content…

They suffered as a result of inferior titles, wages and respect. This “glass ceiling” made it extremely hard for woman to break into higher offices in government organizations, yet O’Conner remained persistent. She finally found a position as a deputy county attorney and began to thrive in the legal field; even landing a seat on the Arizona State Senate where she became the first woman to serve as the state’s Majority Leader. In 1979, she worked on Arizona’s Court of Appeals until she was ultimately appointed to the Supreme Court in …show more content…

O’Connor’s view on abortion rights varied with circumstances, but were generally favorable towards the female public’s desires. She was seen as the Supreme Court’s swing vote on all abortion issues. O’Connor’s proactive view on woman’s rights helped forge the way for woman in the workplace. She inspired many woman to pursue their dream of working in the legal and political field, showing them it was possible for women to hold a high position in government. Her status even inspired women to attend college and push for careers not necessarily related to politics. O’Connor not only focused on feminist issues, she was also quite critical of the death penalty. O’Connor questioned the validity of the death penalty through her concern for the possibility of innocent people being subject to execution at the hands of a mistrial. O’Connor stated, “people represented by court-appointed lawyers were 28 percent more likely to be convicted than those who hired their own lawyers. If convicted, they were 44 percent more likely to be sentenced to death”(NYT, Death Penalty). The increasing accessibility of DNA testing was helping to absolve innocent death-row inmates, confirming the death penalty practice was

Open Document