Roe V. Wade Case Analysis

958 Words2 Pages

Roe v. Wade, the noteworthy Supreme Court decision, overturned a Texas understanding of abortion law and made abortion legal in the United States. The decision implemented that a woman, with her doctor, could choose abortion in premature months of pregnancy without legal restriction, and with limitations in later months, based on the right to privacy. The Court ruled that the states were forbidden from outlawing or controlling any aspect of abortion performed during the first trimester of pregnancy. After the first trimester, states could only sanction abortion regulations judiciously related to maternal health in the second and third trimesters. They could enact abortion laws protecting the life of the fetus only in the third trimester. Even …show more content…

There are important exceptions, though, including some politicians who have rambled on the issue. Certain Democrats who are conservative when it comes to social concerns as such oppose abortion rights and some moderate Republicans are open to allowing women to have the abortion procedure. In 2016, a Pew Research conducted a survey and uncovered that around 60 percent of Republicans believe abortion should be forbidden, and 74 percent of Democrats believe the procedure should be allowed. Generally, a small majority of Americans, around 56 percent, support legalized abortion in America and 41 percent dispute it as found by Pew Research polls. Pew Researches found that in both cases, these figures have remained relatively stable for at least two decades. A large majority of polls indicate that Americans, call themselves "pro-choice" rather than "pro-life by an extremely thin margin. However, this does not mean that everyone who is "pro-choice" believes that abortion is acceptable under any kind circumstance. A very good amount supports restrictions, which the Court found reasonable as well under Roe v. …show more content…

States throughout the country have passed laws defunding Planned Parenthood and stopping them from contributing to public health care programs. America has also witnessed politicians influence laws from tax credit programs to federal family planning funding policies to weaken any institute that even reference abortion. Politicians across the country are ready to sacrifice public family planning centers and domestic violence shelters as collateral damage in their struggles to limit access to abortion care. The very famous case of Roe v. Wade is that the government may not ban abortion before fetal viability. Fetal Viability is what usually happens around 24 weeks of pregnancy. This essentially means a person who doesn't act to end a pregnancy before that point has basically consented to government intervention. States can forbid abortion after viability, so long as they make an exemption for occurrences when a pregnancy compromises a patient's health. A lot of states does prohibit post-viability abortion, and women favor to have very immediate abortions anyway. But each pregnancy is different, and the Supreme Court has been clear that whether a pregnancy is practical is a medical determination that must be made on a case-by-case basis, not by a legislator picking a number. In Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the Supreme Court said that while states can't ban abortion,

More about Roe V. Wade Case Analysis

Open Document