Rhetorical Analysis Of Monica Lewinsky's Speech

1714 Words4 Pages

How many presidents can say they have had an affair in the Oval Office with their secretary? Although the number is uncertain, one is enough to confirm it has happened. In 1998, while Bill Clinton was in office, it was revealed the president was having an affair with his secretary Monica Lewinsky. When Monica Lewinsky turns in the blue dress as evidence of the relationship, covered in semen belonging to the nation’s most influential individual at the time, Mr.Bill Clinton, the media went nuts.The news was all over the story, making headlines and plastered on every magazine imaginable. There was no escaping the truth. The nation’s fascination with the scandal wrecks havoc in President Clinton’s personal life, leading him to address the situation. …show more content…

When someone is to watch the video, you would think that the tone and use of emotional language is enough to capture the hearts of the public watching. After analyzing the undertones of his words, President Clinton tricks the listeners into believing he is actually feeling during the situation. When reading through, there is a sentence that stays in my head for the rest of the speech. The president’s first introduction to Monica Lewinsky sticks to the reader with his words of choice, beginning his sentence with “I did have a relationship with Ms.Lewinsky that was not appropriate” (9). The president’s word tactics creates an effect on the listener, making it seems almost as if it’s okay to have said relationship with someone younger. Saying the words “not appropriate” make you feel different than the use of the word inappropriate. The word inappropriate has a negative connotation, difficult for most readers to read along. The president’s use of the word relationship over affair also paints another picture. Relationship has a sweet sound, like there was emotions and passion in the relation between President Clinton and Monica Lewinsky. However, that is not the case. They used each other for sex, leaving behind all emotions at the door. Going down further into the speech, there is another line in which the use of emotion is used in order to manipulate the reader into sympathizing with President Clinton. In a line it is …show more content…

If one were to just read the speech once over, there would not be much thought into what the president is saying. But after careful analysis, it can be determined that his worlds are just a drag. There isn’t much apology after all. Just a wordy and confusing narration of manipulation that come together to say “get out of my business” The president does not sound sincere and is just trying to cover his trail of lies. Although Clinton tries to play with the emotion aspects of the readers and even tries to bring himself to the level of equilibrium with the citizens of the nation, the fact that the president would do something so outrageous is difficult to forgive. It does not matter so much about his infidelity, but the fact of the matter that he wants to make it seem as if he is a good guy. It is possible that President Clinton is being sincere with the audience and is actually really hurt with what he did to his loved ones, but sounds more rehearsed. With the president's use of pathos, the reader feels cheated as well as Hilary did. There is undertones of sly language,confusing the reader of his true motives. Does Clinton take full responsibility for the affair or was he only taking responsibility for getting caught? With the subliminal use

Open Document