Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Jr.'s Letter

524 Words2 Pages

Martin Luther King Jr. uses contrast, repetition, and listings to further strengthen his letter, inspire others to take action, and leave a long lasting print on his audience. One of the tools King used to create a long lasting impact on people is contrast. In the second paragraph Martin states that, “you [clergymen] warmly commended the police force for keeping “order” and “preventing violence.” I don’t believe you would have so warmly commended the police force if you had seem its angry violent dogs [biting Negros]” (2). Martin Luther King Jr. uses the clergy’s word against them. They stated they were peaceful but in all actuality were quite violent. When King backed his defense up with facts, the clergymen’s word became unreliable. His use of contrast is successful because it puts …show more content…

By apologizing on both sides of the spectrum King covers all of the audience that might have been offended with his letter. It is wise of him to apologize to both sides rather than one so it eliminates all controversy. Another rhetorical strategy martin Luther King Jr. uses to make his letter successful is listing and repetition. Throughout the letter, King lists important (positive or negative) ideas, names, actions, etc. to emphasize the importance of what he is stating at that point in the letter. For example King iterates, “if you would have seen its angry violent dogs” (2) “if you would observe their ugly and inhumane treatment of Negros” (2) “if you would watch them push and curse old Negro women” (2) “if you would watch them slap and kick old negro men” (2). The way King listed all of the cruel and inhumane way the police treated Negros, it gives a sense of uneasiness to all people. When he repeats (repetition) the same phrase, it engraves it into people’s heads so they can’t forget

Open Document