Rhetorical Analysis Of Bells Hooks's Teaching To Transgress

1618 Words4 Pages

Sergio Jackson
Professor Laurel Rayburn
Expo E-15
March 16, 2014
Professor Laurel Rayburn
Analyzing an Argument: Issues in Education

In her article entitled Teaching to Transgress, Bells Hooks effectively speaks to her readers by using the rhetorical strategy of personal narrative, argumentation, and exemplification, in order to call for a “renewal” (29) of teaching method called “engaged pedagogy” (35). By this Hooks means teachers should not merely call on students to participate in class discussion, but also call themselves to be “vulnerable” (49), taking the risk of coupling their points of view, or “confessional narratives” (49), with that of their students, defusing an image of an “all-knowing” (49) teaching authority as a result. Though Hooks’s theory is clear, and her methods of argumentation and exemplification introduce her pedagogical theory, her method of personal narrative requires that the reader be able to relate to her daunting experiences. As a result, readers who have had different experiences to those of Hooks’s might miss her point because they cannot relate to her.
Hooks begins her argument with a personal narrative, explaining her experience as a university student who was “treated with contempt” by professors due to her questioning and impassive behaviors (41). This beginning sets a very personal and heart-felt tone for the reader. Through comparison, Hooks translates the never-ending and difficult times with the words, “…now, we were mainly taught by white teachers whose lessons reinforced racist stereotypes. For black children, education was no longer about the practice of freedom…The classroom was no longer a place of pleasure or ecstasy” (8). Hooks makes a similar comparison and utilizes the same strat...

... middle of paper ...

...eems likely that readers would have a larger ear for an “established theory,” than one’s personal account; in that, one might be viewed as more “proven” than the other.
More important than her rhetorical methods, Hooks ability to couple her understanding of Hanh with her experience with her student, Gary, and how Hooks couples these two lessons. Hooks asserts that Hanh’s works allowed her to see the idea of both students and professors as “striving not just for knowledge in books, but knowledge about how to live in the world,” (33) seemingly, a different outcome might occur since the reader is forced to see a pedagogical theory at work in the life of student, Gary. Hanh’s works relate to Hooks’s growth as a student and scholar. But the arguments also show how to apply these experiences and lessons to students, which supports the idea of teacher as healer (35).

Open Document