Rhetoric In Cathedral

924 Words2 Pages

In Raymond Carver’s short story “Cathedral”, the narrator’s characteristics and traits are displayed through various forms of linguistics and general speech. An example of this is when the narrator first begins to give us an understanding of who the blind man is by telling us that “[he]claiming, “I wasn’t enthusiastic about [the blind man’s] his visit. [The blind man] He was no one [he kI Knew. And his being blind bothered [the narrator]me”. (86). In these linesthis phrase from the text, Carver has established set a base personality for the narrator in order to demonstrate his close-mindedness and arrogance. Readers gain an understanding of this when presented with the narrator’s thoughts, such as, “[a]nd his being blind bothered me”.(86) As …show more content…

But [he] didn’t say anything.”(89) Instead, the narrator substitutes this ‘lash’ remark with small talk, stating “Then I wanted to say something else, small talk, about the scenic ride along the Hudson.” (89) The narrator fails in his attempt to keep the mood between him and his wife subtle, by mindlessly making small talk with the blind man, “Did you have a good train ride?” [he] Said. “Which side of the train did you sit on, by the way?” (89) His wife responds in place of the blind man in a sarcastic tone, remarking, “What a question, which side” [she] said. “What’s it matter which side?” She said.” (89) Although the narrator has displayed persistence in keeping smart remarks towards his wife at bay, he is still very critical of the blind man, but in a more mundane manner than when they were first introduced. The narrator’s criticisms begin to turn from outwardly rude to being more curious. The narrator demonstrates this by stating, “But he didn't use a cane and he didn't wear dark glasses. I’d always thought dark glasses were a must for the blind. Fact was, I wished he had a pair”. As we can see, the narrator still …show more content…

With Robert and the narrator left awake, the narrator takes the final step in progressing their relationship by asking, “if he wanted to smoke some dope with [him].” (92) The narrator changes from being intensely critical of Robert: “Now this same blind man was coming to sleep in my house”,(87) to offering him, “a drink. What's your pleasure”, (90) and finally offering him, “to smoke some dope with [him]”, (92) which in most cases is extremely illegal, therefore showing the importance and trust of this gesture towards Robert. The story ends with the narrator’s worldview being changed in a major way as Robert and the narrator share an enlightening moment together, and the narrator blooms into a new perspective of life when he states, “[m]y eyes were still closed. I was in my house. I knew that. But I didn’t feel like i was inside anything”. (97) In perspective, the narrator is claiming that even though his eyes were physically open when he first met Robert, he didn't truly view the blind-man with open eyes. Instead, he demonstrated arrogance and belittled him with ideas such as the, “thought [that] dark glasses were a must for the blind”. (90) As the story closes, the narrator physically closes his eyes, only to find that a new metaphorical perspective has been brought into fruition, allowing him to view the Robert with ‘new’

Open Document