Relfection on "The Theory behind the Dictionary: Cultural Literacy and Education" by Hirsch

602 Words2 Pages

In the reading, "The Theory behind the Dictionary: Cultural Literacy and Education," they had some great reasoning for their ideas. I liked the author’s whole explanation of someone may know how to read, but until they fully understand the whole background of what they are reading, they are not getting anything from the reading. The reader and the author are not "communicating." They also explain why reading ability measured in how well a person can understand diverse kinds of writing on numerous subjects. I feel that they could not be any more correct. How is someone supposed to learn if they only know a lot of, let us say, a couple subjects. They are not going to learn as much unless they know "a lot" of many subjects Hirsch's approached many directs such as logos, ethos and even a little pathos, but no vision, no interpretation, no invitation to the world of learning. Instead of reading short clips summarizing the great works of literature, should not students try to read the works themselves? The superficiality of Hirsch's approach is pervasive; students taught catch phrases to s...

Open Document