Psychodynamic Theories Of Abnormal Behavior

952 Words2 Pages

Every person is brought into the world in a similar way. We all develop in the womb; we all grow, evolve through the generations, contain different genes, and experience distinct environments that shape the person we become, as we get older. The way people behave, more specifically, abnormal behavior is an extremely complex subject that many scholars have sought to master and understand. There are numerous types of behaviors that people may learn, but there are only a few modeled theories that suggest ways in which abnormal behaviors are recognized and examined (Comer, 2014, p. 34). In this particular assignment, I will be comparing and contrasting the psychodynamic and the behavioral models, which identify two of the common ways abnormal behaviors, …show more content…

According to Comer (2014), the oldest of theories, designed by Sigmund Freud, is the psychodynamic model, emphasizing the unconscious “underlying psychological forces”, called dynamics, which when unbalanced, result in abnormal thoughts and behaviors (p. 39). When exploring abnormal behaviors, Freud created the psychoanalytic theory that illustrates the structure of the mind with id, ego, and superego. The id works by seeking “the pleasure principle” and its ultimate goal is to fulfill its “needs, drives, and impulses” (Friedman & Schustack, 2012, p. 64; Comer, 2014, p. 39). The ego encompasses the unconscious awareness and expresses desires that function through “the reality principle” (Comer, 2014, p. 40). And lastly, the superego is an aspect that replaces unacceptable desires with more acceptable or appropriate values, which means it dominates the ego portion of the thinking process through the conscience (Comer, 2014, p. 40). Eventually, as Freud’s ideas encouraged other scholars to conduct further research that focused on these dynamics, many began concentrating on specific areas to deepen their knowledge in abnormal …show more content…

According to Comer (2014), the behavioral theorists identified many types of conditioning- operant, modeling, and classical, through experimenting in laboratories (p. 46). Each of these conditions demonstrates the importance of an individual’s environment and reinforcements. Additionally, reinforcement is anything that makes a behavior more powerful, which suggests that behaviors can be shaped through conditioning (Myers, 2013, p. 287). According to Friedman and Schustack (2012) operant conditioning is defined as altering a behavior by “manipulating its consequences” (p. 194). In exploring operant conditioning, B.F Skinner designed an experiment, which he created an “operant chamber” that included a lever for pushing that provided food or water, a light, and speaker for recording information (Myers, 2013, p. 287). With this invention, Skinner provided a much deeper understanding in the ability to enforce and shape behaviors. Furthermore, as learning behaviors with rewards is possible, simply observing an individual’s actions, impacts behaviors as well. According to Comer (2014), an individual may learn certain behaviors by repeatedly observing someone else’s behaviors, known as modeling (p. 46). In the final type of learning, classical conditioning is acquired by two events occurring consecutively (Comer, 2014, p. 46). The author explains that Ivan Pavlov initiated an experiment that used a

Open Document