Primary Anti-Heroism In Dostoevsky's Notes From Underground

714 Words2 Pages

Notes from Underground is a standout and one of the most influential pieces of fiction in Western European history. It depicts one of the primary anti-heroes in fiction, a protagonist lacking every trait of the Romantic hero and experienced a useless life on the edges of society. Notes from Underground was initially distributed in January and February of 1864. The novel was written at one of the lowest points of Dostoevsky 's career. His journal was undermined with disappointment, his wife was dying, and his finances was becoming ever more difficult and humiliating. The course of action of the book is exceptionally compelling. In Part I, the storyteller clarifies his identity and gives his contemplations on living underground. In the second part, he portrays some critical occasions throughout his life, and the reader can see how his thinking in Part I has affected his activities in Part II. Before the end of the book, the imaginary audience created by the narrator, as well as the reader of the …show more content…

For the duration of his life, he has gathered awfulness, depression and melancholy because he is unable to avenge to his satisfaction wrongs done to him. Further ambushed by inquiries and problems, he keeps himself in this position by envisioning insults, and disguising the outrage they motivate. In the last part of the book, the underground man who is the storyteller and the protagonist calls attention to that he made a mistake by writing his memoirs because there is no point in indicating how he had ruined his life. He admits that "a novel needs a hero, and every one of the qualities of an anti-hero are explicitly assembled in the novel". With underground man, Dostoevsky depicts an opposite illustration of a legend who does not fulfill satisfy the expectation of readers, but rather still commands the novel as the principle

Open Document