War is a horrific experience made worse by those who try to control it for their own advantage. In Famous Last Words, Timothy Findley creates a world of intrigue as he describes the tales of conspiracy and corruption for world domination. That made World War II far worse than it otherwise would have been. This is shown through the relationships of the Duke and Duchess of Windsor, Joachim von Ribbentrop, and Benito Mussolini. The Duke and Duchess of Windsor are prominent people in society, who want more power.
Power is a very dangerous obsession because it corrupts many individuals. The idea of power corrupting individuals has been present since the time of Hitler, and Napoleon but it has gotten worst in the present time because of the advance technology and individuals ambition for money. A perfect example of an individual that is corrupted by power is Muammar Gaddafi. Muammar Gaddafi, tyrant of Libya, shocked the world by his use of power. Another great example of how power corrupts an individual is shown in the play, Macbeth written by William Shakespeare.
The body, mind, and soul of an individual are capable of becoming corrupted by power. Power makes one feel as if that person was a God, which is a sign of the corruption in that individual. According to Lord Actin, "Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely," states that power can make an individual vulnerable to corruption. The second portion of Lord Actin?s quote discusses absolute power corrupting absolutely which implies that absolute power can corrupt an individual as well as the individual?s surroundings. This idea of corruption can be located in fictional novels such as Animal Farm by George Orwell.
In some cases, government, politicians, and criminals entwine for the sake of amassing money in order to secure their own jobs. This form of corruption was apparent in the mafia’s association with the government in the early 1900’s. Once government involvement takes place, the force foreign to the government gains enough power and evidence against the government that this kind of corruption becomes extremely difficult to stop. Political corruption, however, is most visible in governments in which an elite, or an elite few, hold absolute power, and keeps the saying “absolute power corrupts absolutely” true to this day. In other cases, dictatorships can be the source of corruption.
Examples like Caesar, and Cassius from the play show the difference between absolute power and power, Absolute power leads to chaos then comes in the power to help out and carry on this can also be seen in history of Germany as Hitler was a dictator that got Germany into problems by absolutely corrupting the state of the country. Caesar, Brutus and Hitler are examples to evoke the quote made by lord action. Caesar used absolute power as an advantage to get his needs and his wants out of Rome, and his goal was to be the best man of Rome, and staying a leader, which explicitly show that Caesar is making the people no longer have a say in the government. at the begging of Caesars rule his opposition was Pompey. On the other hand Caesar promised any things that appealed for the Romans which lead to his success as a leader, but Brutus sees that Caesar is getting popular among the people, which would mean that Caesar would get absolute power... ... middle of paper ... ...characteristic that led them to corruption, Caesar was an egocentric which resulted him being to obsessed with power, which he had to be stopped, Cassius was devious and only aiming for his need and wants which led him to be corrupt, as stated this can be seen in real life situations such as dictator ships like the dictator ship in Germany that was led by Hitler and going into a period of genocide, where Hitler killed jews, slavs , pols, handicapped, etc, which proves “ power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely” (lord action 1887), People who believe that absolute power doesn’t corrupt absolutely are very mislead.
Gandhi believed in not only spreading this as a practice but lives his life based on this doctrine. Non-violence looks good on paper, and seems like it would function well, there would be less blood in our world, and instead more conversations, more peace between people and nations but would this really hold up completely today? In the most recent war Afghanistan what would have happened if the president had decided to practice pacifism and do nothing in return based on our beliefs that war is always wrong? Was this even an option for our country? Our president as our leader decided to act accordingly in response to the events going on to protect our nation.
The Revolutionary Policies of Henry VIII Henry was a supreme egotist. He advanced personal desires under the guise of public policy or moral right, forced his ministers to pay extreme penalties for his own mistakes, and summarily executed many with little excuse. In his later years he became grossly fat, paranoid, and unpredictable. Nonetheless he possessed considerable political insight, and he provided England with a visible and active national leader. Although Henry seemed to dominate his Parliaments, the importance of that institution increased significantly during his reign.
Human nature will always corrupt the mind of modern man and send him down the destructive path of war. Due to this, the chronology of war is a constant stream of events that have dated back to the creation of civilization. The inevitability of it is based off something within the mind, that we call human nature. This phoneme pulls the attentions of man towards the path of greatest gain in the quickest amount of time. A part of this is due to mans greed to obtain as much power as possible.
These are just a few examples of complex power dynamics caused by a difference in opinion. Everyone has a different vision of ideal government, and everyone is greedy for power, a deadly combination. While there are many systems of government, I will be explaining the royal adviser Gonzalo 's system and how it compares to Prospero 's ruling when he held power. These two forms of government are flawed
The misuse of their powers led to downfall of their country. An example of an absolute monarch who abused their powers is Louis XIV. He is a very important figure in history because he would make decisions and everyone would be under his power and control. For example, he controlled all the taxations, military power and justice. Furthermore, he did not set a list of defined rules.