Pornography In John Bechdel's Fun Home

1785 Words4 Pages

Narratives are a popular genre throughout literature and within this genre one can find graphic narratives. Sometimes there are images of activities or body parts that some people would think of as explicit. The narrative Fun Home includes s a few images that some may believe to be inappropriate and even pornographic. Since, this narrative contains these images, some jump to the conclusion that the book is pornography, which is not true. Per Google, pornography is defined as “printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity, intended to stimulate erotic rather than aesthetic or emotional feelings.” The images shown in Fun Home are used to describe how the main character figured out …show more content…

In graphic novels, there are different situations and standards that would make something porn. Cole quotes writer Alan Moore, who describes porn in graphic novels as “our secret gardens where seductive paths of words and images lead us to the wide, blinding gateway of our pleasure, beyond which things may only be expressed in a language that is beyond literature, beyond all words” (Cole 122). This simply means that it is hard to find these “gardens,” and that there aren’t many pornographic novels. Bechdel uses the techniques that many other authors use, to keep her narrative from being considered porn. Towards the end of the narrative, Bechdel, has an explicit scene with her and another woman participating in sexual actions. Instead of focusing on the sex, she writes “Like Odysseus on the island of cyclops, I found myself facing a “being of colossal strength and ferocity, to whom the law of man and God meant nothing”” (Bechdel 214). Bechdel explained this sexual scene by relating it to literature and this makes it hard for the reader to even think about sex or become aroused by the images. This is a way to ensure that this scene is not considered porn because Bechdel gives more attention to the literature rather than pointing out the sexual actions taking place. For works that would be considered porn, there are different categories within …show more content…

These people bring to the public’s attention that there must be some sort of censorship in these narratives/novels. Back in 1986, a manager of a comic book store was arrested for the “possession and sale of obscene materials” (Cole 123). This was because some people believe it is wrong to sell the public explicit material, due to morals and religions. Since, this can happen often, authors like Alison Bechdel have created an account to hold money to hire lawyers for those arrested selling graphic novels with sexual material in them. Cole writes “Bechdel works with a number of lesbian and gay writers and artists to secure money for those sued for the creation, publication, and distribution of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transsexual comics” (Cole 123). There may be controversy about censorship of sexual material, but the comics being sold are not considered pornography, and technically can still be sold in stores. The definitions of pornography surly back up this point and show that these graphic novels are legal to sell. If this isn’t enough to prove this point, then one can look to the first

Open Document