Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Youth gangs and theory
The relationship between culture and behavior
Youth gangs and theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Youth gangs and theory
The Social Learning Theory “suggests that much human behavior is learned from modeling others” (pg 118, Thompson). According to Winfree in his article Social Learning, “the theory specifies [on] the general social learning mechanisms by which the rationalizations, norms, rules, and motivations of non-normative behavior are learned but it also specifies the riles of positive and negative social mechanisms, all of which work to condition the ‘learner’ towards or away from crime...behavior is ‘acquired or conditioned by the effects, outcomes or consequences it has on the person’s environment.” (149). According to (Social Learning Winfree) the behavior of these gang members are reinforced depending on the response from others. A positive response from others results in the delinquent …show more content…
Another sociological theory under the social learning theory is the differential definitions, which “conceived to be a product of the process whereby the individual, through interactions with others, learns evaluations of behavior as good or bad. Deviant behavior is more likely to result when individuals develop definitions that are favorable rather than unfavorable to that behavior. The pro-deviance differential-definition measure used in this study was grounded in the ‘gang experience” (158, winfree, social learning). “Placing minority-group gang membership in a theoretical context is crucial if the goal is to develop a broader understanding of youth gangs…one theory that has shown promise as a culture-free explanation of youthful misconduct is Akers’ social learning theory rests entirely on the ‘assumption of conflict between cultures and that one always obeys the norms of one’s group” (106-107, Winfree, Hispanics). There is a Gang Resistance Education and Treating programs which is a “school-based gang-prevention curriculum that has demonstrated evidence of effectiveness. Law enforcement officers middle school students a 13-week curriculum that
According to Becker, the labelling theory of deviance looks at what happens to individuals after they are labelled as deviant (Skatvedt & Schou, 2008) The symbolic interactionist approach focuses on the role of social labels and sanctions that pressure individual gang members to continue engaging in deviant acts (Skatvedt & Schou, 2008).The labelling theory suggests that when an individual is labeled as deviant they are more likely to be rejected by families, friends, and societies which ultimately leads to further deviant acts (Becker, 1973). The deviant identity is thus complete when the individual gang member integrates himself into the gang subculture (Becker, 1973). Two high school gangs, the Roughnecks and the Saints, were constantly involved in deviant acts such as drinking, petty theft etc.,; however, high school teachers labelled the Saints as those headed for success and the Roughnecks as those headed for trouble (Chambliss, 1973) After high school, almost all of the Saints went to college and became doctors, lawyers, etc. while only two Roughnecks went to college and others were involved in killings and dropped out of school and so forth (Chambliss, 1973) This case study demonstrates that labels are powerful; they can trigger a greater involvement in deviant acts through social
Although youth gang violence only accounts for a “small portion of all gang violence, (5-15%)”, it is important that we intervene and stop the growth of youth gangs as early as possible in hopes of decreasing those numbers, and overall gang violence (Gangs in the U.S. PowerPoint). There are many prevention programs in place currently that try and reduce the number of youth joining gangs, each program aims to focus on problems that would lead youth to join gangs, the Aggression Replacement Training program (ART), focuses on the youth who show extreme aggression early signs of a troubled youth. ART has been implemented in schools, communities, mental health facilities, and countries all around the world; this program has been around for a many years and has been effective in many ways. This program, like many others, purpose is to stop youth violence and gang involvement, but can be very effective if implemented in the
Give the kids and teens after-school programs such as sports and mentoring programs. The government should not waste money funding useless laws, instead it should build more boys and girls clubs in the neighborhoods where gangs are likely appearing to organize. Most people who join a gang are just looking for a sense of belonging. These programs will show them they are smart and talented. It is that sense of belonging when they’re in an after-school group.
Once we finished watching the documentary street gangs of Los Angeles two theories were most prevalent in my mind for why there was gang formation in that area. The first being Travis herschi’s “social bonds”. Second being Walter miller’s “focal concerns”. Social bond theory is not a crime causation theory but a pro social behavior theory that helps explain deviance. This theory identified four social bonds that promote adherence to society’s laws and values. The four bonds being: attachment, commitment, involvement, and belief. If there was any weakness in any of these four areas would be an explain for the cause of delinquency. Focal concerns theory is different than many other theories because it is not the rejection of middle-class values but the reasons for the behavior comes directly from the lower-class values themselves. Miller identified six areas in which lower-class males give their attention t: trouble, toughness, smartness, excitement, luck, and autonomy. The more that an individual would participate in one of these areas for more respect they would gain.
Spergel, I., Chance, R., Ehrensaft, K., Regulus, T., Cane, K., Laseter, R., . . . Alexander, A. (1994, October). Gang Suppression and Intervention: Community Models Research Summary. Retrieved March 23, 2014, from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/gangcorr.pdf
however, many studies have looked at ways in which why people turn to gangs and why they commit delinquent activities. Therefore, a further examination in how gang membership and being involved with juvenile delinquents is connected to delinquent behavior is explored. Children learn early on right from wrong and they are taught this content from their parents. In addition research have shown the relationship gang members and peers have on the youths of our society. These influences are not always good, in fact results show that when youth joins a gang and become a member they end up committing more delinquent behavior then they did before their involvement. In similar results claims the same to be true for affiliation with delinquent peers. As a society we must be aware of the needs of our youth or more and more youths will choose the friends wrong friends to hang around as well as the wrong group to associate
...haviors he so wishes to comprehend are those whom he labels as The Cocaine Kids. Now that examples of these drug sellers’ behaviors have been provided, the criminological theories that can explain such behaviors have been made visible to the unseen eye. Criminological theories including the theory of Differential Association, the Subculture of Violence Theory, and the Social Learning Theory can be viewed as methods for developing a knowledgeable understanding of how and why such behaviors introduced individuals to the drug-selling world, kept them submerge deep within it, and allowed for them to leave it.
Wong, I. W., Toh, D. P., Hung, P. P., & Ang, R. P. (2013, December). Delinquency in gangs - Selection or socialization?Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(6), 784-791. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2013.10.001
Differential Reinforcement is defined to occur when behavior is reinforced by being either rewarded or punished while interacting with others (Siegel, 2003). With this said, the theory was developed as a way of labeling both positive, as well as negative aspects of individual action. This idea of reinforcement is a branch of the infamous Differential Association theory presented by Edwin H. Sutherland in 1939. Another commonly used term for this theory of reinforcement is called differential conditioning (Siegel, 2003). As mentioned, the types of reinforcement are either positive or negative, and operate on the results of specific crimes or random acts. Rewarding behaviors plainly urges such action to be repeated, while punishment often deters those offenders from repeating their same mistakes. Parenting practices, social groups, schools, television, and the community are just a few of the examples that are linked to this theory. According to Ronald Akers (1966), each behavior a person commits is a learned behavior, meaning some type of outside force paved the way to this various knowledge. This theory goes hand in hand with the ideology that he argued in his studies, but focuses on the after effects (or results), rather than prevention or control. This theory does not help support the effectiveness of deterrence, but it does give us a little insight on why people decide to engage in criminal activity. Perhaps the most influential group in shaping someone’s behavior is their peer group. Take for example, gang activity. Street gangs, though usually found in highly urbanized areas, still exist and even thrive throughout most of the United States. It is the safety, security, and power that effects these members with faulty, risky and distant thinking, which usually ends up in some type of negative reinforcement. Guilt is often by association, as well as socialization. Purely, this relationship dominates the theory of crime as a learned behavior. No one is born with the general knowledge of how to break the law or to simply be criminal by nature, but through life experiences and perceptions of the events that surround them, the criminal activity is learned. Use the professional art of safe (or vault) cracking, for example. To perform such a trick, one must be taught how to do it. Such information is never provided at birth, or thr...
Understanding the importance of what happen is not merely as important as figuring out why something happen. There are many different whys in the criminal justice world, which is known today as theories. One in particular is called the labeling theory. Rather than looking at why some social gatherings carry out more wrongdoing, the labelling theory asks why some people committing some actions come to be defined as deviant, while others do not. Labelling theory is also interested in the effects of labelling on individuals.
In 1947 Sociologist Edwin Sutherland (and later Melvin DeFleur, Richard Quinney, Robert Burgess, and Ronald Akers; as seen in Burgess & Akers, 1966) posited that criminal behavior is at least partially learned and that our social networks play a vital role in this process. Later research provided empirical support to this (Akers, Krohn, & Lanza-Kaduce, 1979). In this view, criminal behavior is learned both socially and non-socially though operant conditioning. The individual’s social networks (e.x. family and friends) are the primary source for reinforcement of these behaviors (Burgess & Akers, 1966). In essence our social networks teach us both specific behaviors as well as the social norms of our (sub) culture. When we behave a certain way, our behavior is reinforced or punished. Behavior that is reinforced is more likely to continue.
Statistics show that school-based programs as well as community-based prevention programs minimize gang involvement. School-based programs address substance abuse and violence, which reduces the risk factors for gang involvement. For example, in the article “What Can Schools Do to Prevent Gang Involvement,” by Gary D. Gottfredson, he states, “universal programs in kindergarten through secondary school, which [is a] rewarding educational environment im...
As kids grow up, they’re unable to fully align their actions with reason and conjure their own beliefs without outside influences. According to Shaw and McKay, younger people who associate with peers that are gang members or affiliates are more likely to partake in similar activities. Ultimately “criminal behavior is learned through social interactions.” (p.44). Although those who grow up in a disorganized community are more likely to develop a weaker sense of control, doesn’t necessarily mean they cannot develop a strong one. Similar to those who have grown up in a well-controlled neighborhood, there will always be both criminal influences and conventional influences. Sutherland introduces this idea though his theory of differential association. Whichever influence stand dominate over time, that particular person will embrace one side or the other. These idea of differential association gave inspiration to dig even further into this claim. With different sources of influences such as, relationships with family, organizations and public relations can either support the youth’s values or hinder them. So, looking at a well-organized neighborhood. In most cases, family members are well educated, formulate positive organizations and have little to no trouble with the law. As a result, impacts the youth in a way which we consider law-abiding. On the other hand, those who are part of an organized community are
Ones’ socio-economic environment serves to predetermine the possibility of achieving ones’ financial success through legitimate means, which are available to the middle and upper classes, or illegitimate means, which is the only choice for the lower class. For instance, if children grew up in a poor neighborhood, where there aren’t many available financial means to allow them to achieve their dreams the legal way, such as paid for college, health insurance, etc. So, as a way to make money, children in a poverty stricken area are more likely to commit criminal acts like stealing, selling drugs, prostitution, etc. Furthermore, the degree of integration in a community is a main factor for delinquent subculture. In lower class area, the degree of integration of business, politics and organized crimes, control the social organization in that community thus, creating three types of delinquent gang. The first type, the criminal gang, arise in areas where conventional as well as non-conventional values of behavior are integrated by ages as well as illegitimate and legitimate groups. Older criminals serve as role models to the youngsters and teach them the necessary criminal skills. The second type, the conflict gang, is unstable and non-integrated, where there is a lack of criminal organization causing instability. This gang display uncontrolled
Akers, R. L. (2009). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. New Brunswick [N.J.: Transaction Publishers