Person Centred Planning

486 Words1 Page

I think Headquarters embodies person-centered planning. We are almost-always working with one person at a time, trying to identify the resources (including people) they have in their life that they can use to get through whatever the crisis they are having at the moment may be. There is no doubt that at our agency the person is at the center. We do not force the caller to do anything, unless we have determined they are in danger and active rescue is necessary. We work through a safety plan with the caller that outlines who they can talk to, what activities they are able to do while time passes, and so on. We never tell the caller what to do, but if we have an idea we frame it as a question, such as "You said you like reading. What would it be like to read until you can talk to your mom when she …show more content…

Ongoing listening, learning, and further action is hard in our setting because we are a crisis line, and only hear from most callers once. We are always available to talk to them, though. Getting others involved in the planning is tough, because most of the time we are only talking to the person in crisis. We identify family members or other people in the caller's life who they are comfortable talking to about their issues, and with children our biggest push is to identify a safe adult (usually a family member) they can speak with. These people are not part of the actual planning process, though. I think a good change would be making the "outsiders" aware of the plan and part of the process, but in many cases that could be impossible unless you have the time to play phone tag (which on a crisis line you really don't). Having that identified resource notified of the plan and their role in it (hopefully they have had their own input as well), I think, would make the callers more accountable to following through with the plan they made and seeking help to ensure their

Open Document