Permian-Triassic Extinction

1099 Words3 Pages

The Great Dying: The Causes and Evolutionary Effects of the Permian-Triassic Extinction
In the early nineteenth century, the famous French paleontologist and anatomist Georges Cuvier was convinced that the Earth and its species were not susceptible to evolution. In reference to the paleontological phenomenon that was the recently-discovered fossil record, Cuvier proposed that the Earth had undergone a series of great catastrophes (later termed “punctuated equilibrium”), and attributed the different time periods as intervals of major catastrophes, the last of which was the Genesis flood (Turner 1984). In Cuvier’s mind, the Earth was repopulated by remaining species that had survived the crisis. His theory thus supported Carl Linneaus’ idea that …show more content…

For centuries, the colossal evidence of faunal turnover has made it an important occurrence. The magnitude of the species-level extinction wasn’t known until Raup (1979) estimated that as many as 96% of all marine species may have died out. His procedure, which has since been thrown out, was to determine the percent of extinction for the higher taxonomic groups by referring to the general fossil record. He then employed the rarefication curve technique to calculate the percent of species extinction through the disappearance of higher groups (Briggs 1990). It has been subsequently discovered that that the fossil record as a whole cannot be used for entire analyses (Smith and Patterson 1988), but Raup’s numbers hold up nonetheless. Both Bergstrom (2009) and Benton (2005) confirmed Raup’s estimate of 96%. Further, an estimated 70% of all terrestrial vertebrates became extinct as well (Sahney 2008). Occurring 250 million years ago, the extinction reduced a record high of Palaeozoic species diversity to the lowest post-Ordovocian value of the entire Phanerozoic (Allison and Briggs 1993). The effects of the P/T extinction were also not attained again until the Cretaceous period (Benton 1995).
The diversity …show more content…

Jablonski (1994) calculated and compared the extinction events with one another to illuminate the stark difference between the P/T extinction (labeled “End-Permian” in the experiment) parallel to others. With End-Permian’s calculated species loss at 95%, the second-highest is the end of the Ordovician extinction with 85%. In the observed extinction of families, End-Permian reports an estimated 51%. The next highest estimate is End-Ordovician with 26%, and the End-Cretaceous which receives the lowest of 16%. The trend continues with the observed extinction of genera, with End-Permian at an estimated 82%, and End-Ordovician at 60%. In all of those metrics weighing biological loss, the P/T extinction is ahead by a minimum of 10% (Benton

Open Document