Paul Tillich Unbroken Myths Summary

1228 Words3 Pages

Paul Tillich’s description of the original understanding of the word myth as an account of an interaction between the human and the divine are that myths are symbols of faith, which tell stories to portray situations of ultimate concern. Myths may be ‘broken’ or ‘unbroken.’ Unbroken myths are myths which are accepted as literal statements of reality. Broken myths are myths which are interpreted as myths, as symbolic statements of reality. The “popular use of the word myth to denote something that is thought by many people to be “true,” but actually is not true can be examined through history. Today’s current understanding of myth is: “A traditional or legendary story, usually concerning some being or heroor event, with or without a determinable basis of fact or a naturalexplanation, especially one that is concerned with deities or demigodsand explains some practice, rite, or phenomenon of nature,istories or matter of this kind,iany invented story, idea, or concept,ian imaginary or fictitious thing or person,ian unproved or false collective belief that is …show more content…

This can generate a huge detrimental loss of history and the lessons learned for the Myths if they were to be casted away as untrue. Myths still have a meaning; whether true or false, taking away a myth creates taking away its healthy and helpful meaning, yet “criticism” of everything equally important due to it attracting the completed purpose and point of the madder. If questions were never asked about anything, there would only ever be information and never knowledge or new information. People being critical of faith could lead to a loss part of followers of that faith, but could also greatly add to the congregation for those who agree with or respect the answers they find from being critical. “Criticism” involves both positive and negative

Open Document