Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays regarding parental alienation
Essays regarding parental alienation
Parental alienation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays regarding parental alienation
Parental Alienation Syndrome is defined as a syndrome where one parent (usually the custodial parent) alienates the child or children from the other parent. A child psychiatrist organized this syndrome by the name of Richard Gardner. The fact that Parental Alienation Syndrome is used in custody litigations makes it a very controversial issue. The syndrome tends to target one parent and favor the other, sometimes leaving the child in compromising situations. Also, Gardner's 'syndrome' lacks scientific background and is seen as nothing more than a theory by many other professionals. Parental Alienation Syndrome should not be considered in court custody battles, as it is nothing more than an inadequate theory.
Parental Alienation Syndrome has begun to show up in courtrooms across the nation more in custody battles. This syndrome, devised by Richard Gardner, makes it seem that one parent is alienating the child from the other parent. PAS is often focused on the mother, claiming that she may say or do things to the child to favor her and belittle the father. Gardner states that the mother, "programs the child to hate the other parent". If a child shows any negativity towards one parent during a custody battle, PAS is often brought into the matter, blaming the other parent for the child's negative behavior. PAS does nothing more than mask the real problems in court cases while dwelling on something excessive.
Why is PAS an unjust approach to use in a courtroom? PAS can often blind the court officials and a child can mistakenly be put into an unsafe living situation. Many courts are uneducated of the fact the Parental Alienation Syndrome is not actually a syndrome but just a theory. The judges and the jury, many...
... middle of paper ...
...nation Syndrome should not be used in courtroom custody battles. Especially because of the fact that there is no scientific background or proof of Gardner's theory, it should not be a liable resource in the courts. Many children are put into situations of abuse due to Gardner's PAS. The courts are even blinded by his theory due to the lack of knowledge. Richard Gardner is a sick man who is living with the ideals of people fifty years ago, yet, his theory still being used in courtrooms today? Why is this? Why would anyone want to base a child's life off of a simple theory that came from one man? The use Parental Alienation Syndrome needs to be halted in America's courtrooms. It is one of those things that can make or break a child's life. More research should definitely be conducted to prove that Gardner's 'syndrome' is nothing but a single man's theories.
For the purpose of the paper, I will summarize the facts and leading events of the case of Elenita L and Romer N. Fajota. As reading through this trial I discovered that judges don’t always make the right decision for families or individuals. Likely in this case it is presentably true. Elenita and Romer got married in June 2005 and have three minor children together. As their marriage progressed, in the beginning of the year 2006, Romero became physically violent against Elenita. Romer committed various acts of violence against her and stated in court that it continued “even while pregnant with their second child”. But however, from 2006 to 2008 the violence continued against Elenita and her children. As the domestic violence continued, Elenita filed a
The book “No Matter How Loud I Shout” written by Edward Humes, looks at numerous major conflicts within the juvenile court system. There is a need for the juvenile system to rehabilitate the children away from their lives of crime, but it also needs to protect the public from the most violent and dangerous of its juveniles, causing one primary conflict. Further conflict arises with how the court is able to administer proper treatment or punishment and the rights of the child too due process. The final key issue is between those that call for a complete overhaul of the system, and the others who think it should just be taken apart. On both sides there is strong reasoning that supports each of their views, causing a lot of debate about the juvenile court system.
The areas in which these reforms should occur are twofold. One argument that Judge Ross raises repeatedly is that measures should be taken to insure the sustainability of Family Court employees through more manageable caseloads. The necessity of this change is evident in countless examples of children suffering as a result of constantly changing, thin-spread, staff. In one particular instance, a six month child abuse case is adjourned because they “don’t have the medical records” in time (128). The second argument that can be implicitly made based off of Judge Ross’s expressed frustrations is that, if given the proper time for consideration, there should be more room for consideration of circumstance in Family Court. From a legal standpoint, there is substantial evidence for the validity of a common law approach to Family Court over the traditional civil law. Judge Ross establishes that ideally “In each case to protect children, to assure due process, to remain neutral until the facts are established, to apply common sense and sound judgment within the framework of the law in making decisions—the Family Court judge’s charge lies quite outside the arena of public policy, comment, and debate” (104). However, as seen in many of his cases, the combination of the overflowing workload and an inability to apply proper consideration to any given circumstance makes it impossible for the pre-existing
...l now be given the power to interfere in cases where parents have failed in their duties towards the child. This is extremely important as it allows the State to intervene in cases where there has been a failure, which was difficult to do in the past. This new role of protecting children's rights is favourable as it will, hopefully, prevent any failure by the State to children in unacceptable circumstances/situation.
With the increasing number of cases each day, concerns are being raised as to whether the rights of parents are being violated. It is common knowledge that there have been serious accuracy flaws resulting in the wrongful termination of many parents’ rights. However, little is being done to fix these errors and give parents their children back. Child Protective Services is the most needed yet unwanted agency in each state. While a system is necessary to intervene and protect children who are abused, there is speculation on the procedures and policies the state uses.
Susie’s mother opened the door to let Molly, Susie’s babysitter, inside. Ten-month old Susie seemed happy to see Molly. Susie then observed her mother put her jacket on and Susie’s face turned from smiling to sad as she realized that her mother was going out. Molly had sat for Susie many times in the past month, and Susie had never reacted like this before. When Susie’s mother returned home, the sitter told her that Susie had cried until she knew that her mother had left and then they had a nice time playing with toys until she heard her mother’s key in the door. Then Susie began crying once again.
According to many the custody of a child should be determined with the best interest of the child in mind. However, it is not easy for a judge to make such an important decision in such a short amount of time with limited information. Smith (2004) stated that, the simple fact of being a mother does not indicate a willingness or capacity to render a quality of care different than that which a father can provide. Some might argue that what Reynolds (2004) calls deadbeat dads, or in other words fathers who refuse to pay their child support, are often times confused with Turnips, who are ex-spouses who can not afford to pay child support. One example of a turnip is a father who is in prison; he is obviously not making money while he is on the inside. Now an example of a deadbeat dad is when the father is enjoying all the finer things in life and he cannot reach far enough into his...
Copyright (c) 1999 West Virginia Law Review West Virgina Law Review, Winter, 1999, 102 W. Va. L. Rev. 477, 13457 words, STUDENT WORK: Changing the Law in Child Abuse and Neglect Proceedings: An Improvement on Improvement Periods?, Morgan E. Persinger
child is not picked up within two days, he or she is considered abandoned. Expulsion is refusal of custody; a child cannot be allowed in the home without arranging for care, or not accepting the return of a runaway. Shuttling is when a child is left in another caregiver’s custody for extended periods of time repeatedly. Nutritional neglect is when a child is left undernourished for long peri...
In Ontario, at least one in three individuals encounter some sort of maltreatment over his or her childhood, with neglectful parenting being the most rampant form (“Child Maltreatment in Canada”, 2012, para. 6-7). Neglectful parenting, often called uninvolved, indifferent, or dismissive parenting is one of the four distinct parenting styles specified by psychologist Baumrind’s taxonomy of parenting styles (van der Horst et. al., 2017, para. 3). The four-fold typology of parenting is typically dependent on dimensions of responsiveness and demandingness and respectively, the neglectful parenting style is significantly low in both dimensions (van der Horst et. al., 2017, para. 3). According to Baumrind, “Neglectful parents are least involved towards their children’s needs, providing the most basic of facilities but no room or opportunity for recreational and developmental activities” (Aswanthi, 2017, para.
The sympathy of the government for mothers such as Khaila, trying to recover their parental rights has worn thin. Child abandonment is a serious offense and the children that suffer from such neglect face many psychological problems; if they are ever able to survive their circumstances. The abandonment and neglect of a child can result in serious criminal charges. One striking example is the case of seven month old Daniel Scott (Should We Take Away Their Kids?). Baby Daniel had been left for hours unattended and died of in a pool of his own blood. His mother, a crack addict left him in the care of his father to go on a six day crack binge. His father in turn, left him in his crib leaving the door of their Bronx tenement unlocked for any danger to afflict his unprotected son (Should We Take Away Their Kids?). The parents were later charged with manslaughter by negligence.
As such, I find Noddings and the Court’s decision to be more different than the same. In this case the one-caring held the fetus and one-self best interest rather than the one cared for. Not all parents are ideal parents. Some parents bring more harm to their children than good. This case showed me that even though some parents fail to provide their children the help and support they need, there are adults out there who devote their time and life providing help and support to those neglected children. For example, one of my closest friend had parents that were very old school and strict. In our language, we have a word for that people because there are a lot of them. They’re called Jahil. Protectiveness, a restrictive lifestyle and a certain level of Jahil thinking in elders leads to them emotionally damaging their children. Most Jahil parents don’t realize it due to the time and environment differences. My friend self-esteem suffered because her parents constantly called her dark and weak and had restrictions on things that were accessible to other teenagers her age. She knew this was no reason to act aggressive towards them or disrespects them. They didn’t think their Somali sayings about
Throughout my work experience I have been a witness to various degrees of work alienation. As I continue to gather additional experience in the work environment and engage in discussions with fellow employees, it is clearly evident that there is workplace discontentment and feelings of being taken advantage of. Based on my work experiences to date, I agree with James Rinehart’s claim that forms of alienation are evident in the workplace. They force human beings into modes of behaviour that are unnatural and possibly harmful. I will illustrate that as we live in a capitalist environment, employees have little say or control over decisions made by their employers; workers do not have power over the processes or methods of work; workers lack fulfillment and are not treated fairly in their workplace and class structures are created to show dominance behavior.
In a divorce, the parents usually do not get along and may have different opinions on items. They may go to court and fight against each other about what factors caused the separation leading to the divorce and how the properties are divided. This possible exposure is very unhealthy for a child. The child sees his parents fighting and may learn from the behavior and display it. He or she may see that behavior as being an acceptable action. The fighting behavior of parents causes behavioral problems within a child. The child may hear things from one parent about the other that causes the child to take sides when he or she should be learning not to be biased and to love both parents equally.
When applying for any job, a few things they ask for is a resume, job experience, and training. Some jobs also have restrictions such as one’s age. Others may require certain educational levels, reliable transportation, or even a license of some sort. Being a full-time mother or father is considered a job by many yet, unlike regular jobs, there are no restrictions, no training, or any experience necessary to become a parent. Being a proper parent is the most valuable job yet the easiest to obtain. This leads to many adults being unfit parents with a lack of knowledge or will to raise children. A few areas people should be required to be approved or trained in before becoming parents are: