PAPER

1747 Words4 Pages

ETHICAL APPLICATION ASSIGNMENT # 6 Case Study: The John DeLorean Case NAME: Liliana Pardo Mazzelli 1. MORAL AGENT: John DeLorean 2. MORAL ISSUE: “Whether to sell drugs to save his company from bankruptcy.” 3. LISTS OF PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES: a) If the action is taken 1. John DeLorean may fall into the FBI trap in the rush to save his company and he will not be able to get money to save his company anyway. 2. John DeLorean could end up facing chargers for drug trafficking if the FBI catches him. 3. John DeLorean could be arrested if he gets caught selling drugs. 4. John DeLorean could be sentenced to ten years in prison for selling drugs in a rush to save his company. 5. John DeLorean could be charged with conspiracy to possess and distribute cocaine. 6. John DeLorean could be sentenced to five-year parole after his release from prison. 7. John DeLorean could be exposed by cause the FBI and Drug Enforcement Administration. 8. John DeLorean’s company will be destroyed and his dream of saving it will turn into dust. 9. John DeLorean will cause his employees to lose their jobs affecting their family and livelihoods. 10. John DeLorean could get arrested and his luxury lifestyle will be over. 11. John DeLorean will let his family, friends, investors, and employees down if he sells drugs to save his company. b) If the action is not taken 1. John DeLorean could declare himself bankrupt and get a fair decision from the court. 2. John DeLorean could have avoided the trap that the FBI orchestrated against him. 3. John DeLorean would hot have gotten desperate and could keep on trying for the loan; it’s very possible he would have gotten it. 4. John DeLorean he will have never been arrested and given parole. 5. John DeLorean could ... ... middle of paper ... ...s to save his company in his career evaluation, and if he were to be placed behind the veil of ignorance (that is, he would not know anything about himself, no personal knowledge), and if he were to be free to act, and acted rationally and in his own self-interest, he agreed to sell the drugs by the Equal Liberty Principle. In this situation, everyone is not being treated equally. John would not know if he was in such a situation or being treated in this manner; therefore supporting the action would not necessarily be in his self-interest. A rational person would not the risk of prison from selling drugs nor would a rational person want to be the one receiving and/or using the drugs. Drugs are not for the benefit of all, and therefore a rational person would avoid them. The Equal Liberty Principle can be applied in this case, since all will be treated equally.

More about PAPER

Open Document