Othello's Guilty Analysis

749 Words2 Pages

When gathering information on who's guilty or not in this play Criminal law is the best tool that will help to determine. The play offers reciprocally some provocative thought on who is and who is not responsible for Desdemona's death. The evidence is found in the exchange of conversation between each character, along with the items used to demise her. Based on the evidence in the book Othello is indisputably guilty.

In criminal law, manslaughter is third-degree murder and is said to be a passion murder. The destruction of Desdemona according to this law would be classified as a third-degree murder. Murder defined also as having no prior intent to kill, but going from reasonable to emotional thinking, describes Othello. In this time-period estimated to be about 1603, the repercussions for murder was death by the rack, Iron Maiden, Beheading, and dunking. These types of punishments took fear, execution, and torture to another level, that Othello should of experience because he was guilty of the murder of Desdemona. …show more content…

In act two Iago stated that he hated women if you stopped right there you would think he's guilty. In act three after stealing the handkerchief, Emilia encourages Desdemona to talk to her husband on Cassio's behalf it appears like she is setting her up to be killed. Act four gives proof that Othello is guilty as he makes it known the intention to slaughter Desdemona. Act five tells of Othello's rage, hostility, and vexation that puts an end to Desdemona

More about Othello's Guilty Analysis

Open Document