Of Mircacles

790 Words2 Pages

David Hume wrote An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding in 1748 and contained in this was an essay entitled “Of Miracles”. David Hume was a Scottish Philosopher that lived in the 18th century he was born on May 7th, 1711 and would die on August 25th, 1776. He was from a philosophical school known as Empiricism, which basically means that everything originates through sense experience. He believed that everything we know ultimately started in the senses. So, in essence we learn and know everything we do via our five senses: sight, hearing, taste, and touch. This was opposed to Rationalism, which stated that we, as humans, have innate knowledge and that we use reason to discover this. Rene Descartes is a famous rationalist, whose philosophy would come under attack from Hume.

In order to truly understand the document “Of Miracles” one has to know a little bit about Empiricism and the Philosophy of David Hume. Empiricism states that everything is known through the sense. And because of this we, as humans, can never truly know much about causation. In fact, David Hume said that we can never know causation. For instance, if someone was to pick up an apple and drop it an Empiricist would say that one can never know the causal relationship between the two actions. The individual would not know if the fact that the apple dropped when he let it go was of a causal relationship, coincidental, or if there was a correlation. This means that the senses are inherently troublesome. For example, if you were to conduct and experiment of dropping the apple one hundred times the chance of that apple dropping on the one hundredth and one drop would be almost zero. This is because time is infinite, so no matter how many times you drop that...

... middle of paper ...

...ple. This is why Hume finds human statements less credible than his senses.

This essay is historically significant because it shows one example of why the Roman Catholic Church started to lose power during the age of reason. It also illustrates a philosophical shift from rationalism to a more scientific empiricism. Rationalism was based on the belief that Humans were given innate knowledge by a grand designer and that they would use reason to figure, and obtain, this knowledge. Then came the more trial and error, or experiment based, approach known as Empiricism. This, like science, used exposure to numerous events to make something probable. This new way of thinking most likely helped science prosper in the Enlightenment and continue to be a dominant force in our world today. David Hume was a major component of this and helped spur the Scientific Revolution.

    More about Of Mircacles

      Open Document