Oedipus The King Research Paper

1578 Words4 Pages

Oedipus the King, the Anti-Tragic Tragedy
Sophocles’ drama, Oedipus The King plays out the misfortune of the King of Thebes, Oedipus who kills his father and marries his mother; committing two sins of the highest order. Although this drama is a tragedy; owing to the fact that the hero comes into ruination by the end of the play, it is not tragic; in the sense that his downfall is not merely pre-dictated by destiny and the will of the Gods but is brought about by his independent decisions. Aristotle defines tragic as “misfortune [that] is brought about by some error or frailty” (17), but Oedipus exercises free will and determines to circumvent his fate. Despite the fact that he is not able to avert his destiny, he does not succumb to …show more content…

Oedipus’ fall comes as a result of his relentless pursuit of truth. E.R. Dodds comments that “the immediate cause of Oedipus’ ruin is not ‘Fate’ or ‘the Gods’— no oracle said that he must discover the truth” (43). If he did not push for the knowledge of truth, it is contestable that his sins of the past would not have such a bearing on his present and his future. It is extremely telling how Sophocles presents forewarnings and emphasises Oedipus’s complicity in his ultimate fall. It is seen in Teiresias not wanting to tell Oedipus that he is the killer of Laius. More resounding is Jocasta’s plea to Oedipus to “give o’er this quest” (1063-1064) and the use of the personal first person pronoun ‘I’ in “enough the anguish I endure” (1064) subtly hints at the gravity of the truth he is about to uncover. His ruination comes from him knowing the faults he has committed and then choosing, decisively, to exact punishment on himself. Dodds further describes that “certain of Oedipus’ past actions were fate-bound; but everything he does on stage from first to last he does as a free agent” (42) and notes that his …show more content…

It is said that Oedipus “should defile (his) mother’s bed” (806) and “slay the father from whose loins (he) sprang” (808). The prophecy represents no uncertainty whatsoever in the events that would lead to Oedipus’ fall and eventual demise. While Oedipus initially entertains the idea that he could be the murderer of Laius, he does so hypothetically and the use of “if” (824) as the main determiner of the sentence alludes to this. The stark juxtaposition of certainty against a plausible idea deals with the conflict between the truth and what is plausible enough to be the truth. Although it does offer some hope in Oedipus’ predicament, it largely makes for a pendulum effect, swinging between almost the plausible truth and almost uncovering the real truth, an example being when Oedipus is relieved momentarily when he finds out that Polybus dies naturally (would mean he has evaded the prophecy), only to be resoundingly crushed when he faces the fact that Polybus was not his father. In doing so, however, the effect of the ultimate revelation of truth is intensified. It also mirrors the act of Oedipus trying to escape the prophecy; despite his best efforts, his fate remains unchanged. More critically, this describes the futility of Oedipus’ actions because despite whatever he does, his destiny is

Open Document