No Exit Existentialism Essay

699 Words2 Pages

Humans remain responsible and clueless. Human encounter existentialism in their very existence. Existentialism occurs every day, often in literature and plays. Many plays incorporate existentialism in its characters. In the play, “No Exit” or “Huis Clos”, Jean-Paul Sartre writes an absurdly clueless character who personifies existentialism in that he embodies absurdism with his ignorance to his own mistakes and attempts to avoid subjectivity in order to spare himself shame. Garcin embodies existentialism because he lives and breathes in absurd manners. Garcin exhibits absurdity because he believes that he preoccupies hell because he deserted his call to the army. Garcin cheated on his wife multiple times and caused her death. He cheated on …show more content…

Garcin brought another woman home. In doing this, he destroys any sense of sanctuary for his wife. He resides in hell because he regrets nothing. He focuses his energy on how he abandoned war, but he does not realize that he will remain in hell for eternity because he emotionally slaughtered his wife where she stood. He tore her heart from her chest and devoured it and spit it into the mouth of another woman. Garcin experiences no guilt because he competes continuously with Inez and Estelle for subjectivity. None of the characters experience any shame for their sins the others saw their sins and judged them so, their embarrassment at being judged led to shame. When someone sits in a room, the person rests as the subject of anyone watching them. When two people sit in a room, both subsist as subjects to each other. Garcin, Inez, and Estelle detest being the subject of one another and only feel shame when they become subject of each other. Garcin especially tries to avoid subjectivity by attempting to isolate himself from the girls. “I'd rather be alone. I want to think things out, you know; to set my life in order, and one does that better by oneself” (Sartre 80). Garcin does not comprehend his shame as long as he avoids subjectivity. He believes that his cowardice landed him in hell and he refuses to even approach the subject in fear of judgement from the

Open Document