Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What was the impact of the no child left behind act
How to Solve the problem of no Child Left Behind
What was the impact of the no child left behind act
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What was the impact of the no child left behind act
Is a No Child Left Behind Act helping student in school from 1st grade until they graduate high school? No, the No Child Left Behind Act is not helping students. “Emphasizes on yearly progress forces teachers to focus on preparing for tests instead of teaching life skill (Montey, pg. 162).” The quote from Neill Montey explains how No Child Left Behind can potentially corrupt the learning experiences for students. The No Child Left Behind Act passed in 2002 forces students, all over America, to take multiple tests a year and the tests dictate if students should pass or fail a class (Monty, pg176). Instead of helping students the No Child Left Behind Act puts stress on the teachers and students, forces teachers to constantly prepare students to pass tests instead of preparing students for tests teachers should be teaching them life lessons in classrooms, and repetitive testing of the same test over and over encourages cheating and memorization among students.
The act, placed in 2002, puts too much emphasis on tests and as a reaction students and teachers become stressed when testing time comes around. The standardized tests put in place by the No Child Left Behind Act shows how well a teacher is preparing their students for the tests by comparing their student’s grades to other schools within their district, state and even throughout America (Gerson, Washington Post). Teachers will attempt to prepare their students to pass the tests to their best abilities, but if there are students in the class that refuses to listen and distract other students the teachers will become stressed and stressed teacher are not as in the method they choose to teach in. When students constantly interrupt class it limits the teaching time for teachers an...
... middle of paper ...
... The No Child Left Behind Act has not saved the American education system, but the No Child Left Behind Act has corrupted the system to point teachers are stressed to the point where they can not teach efficiently and stresses students to the where they are depressed and that increases the chance of them to resort to cheating or even drop out high school (Downey, Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
Works Cited
Downey, Maureen . “A Decade of No Child Left Behind: A hit or a miss?” Atlanta Journal-Constitution. 09 Jan. 2012: A.10. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 12 Feb. 2014
Duncan, Arne. “We’re Tardy in updating No Child.” Washington Post. 26 Aug. 2013 a.15. Sirs Issues Researcher. Web. 12 Feb. 2014
Gerson, Michael.” No Child’ is being left behind.” Washington Post. 20 Jul. 2012: 2012 A.19. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 12 Feb. 2012
Neill, monty educaction Thomas Gale 2005
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001’s main purpose was to enhance the education system and hold schools accountable in its attempt to bring equality in the fight against poverty for poor and minority groups. Once this Act was signed into law the American public expected an overhaul of the education system with only good outcomes. The public assumed our children would be receiving the best education available and the economic issues that plagued schools would no longer be a problem. In the beginning of its implementation No Child Left Behind was expected to bring America up to standards with other nations, this was something that America has struggled to do for many years. Our children were now being put first according to Act and the public and many political figures were ecstatic over the possibilities.
The implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act applied a market approach to school reform as a way of improving the school system. This new law promised an era of high standards, testing, and accountability in
Neill, Monty. "The No Child Left Behind Act Is Not Improving Education." Education: Opposing Viewpoints. New York: Greenhaven, 2005. 162-68. Print.
...it: Greenhaven Press, 2013. At Issue. Rpt. from "The Future of Immigrant Children." The Future of Children (Spring 2011).Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 21 Apr. 2014.
At a time of wide public concern about the state of education, the legislation sets in place requirements that reach into virtually every public school in America. The law emphasizes accountability, teacher quality, parent choice, improved teaching methods, and flexibility. (Correa) Strict requirements and deadlines have been set for states to expand the scope and frequency of student testing, revamp their accountability system and guarantee that every classroom is staffed by a ?highly qualified? teacher in his or her own subject area. (I ed) The plan also mandates annual student testing in reading and math by 2005, and requires all school districts to allow students in consistently low-performing schools to transfer to higher performing schools, at the districts expense. (Hull) From year to year, states are required to improve the quality of their schools. No Child Left Behind has expanded the federal ...
Rich, M. (2013, July). Education Proposal in House Could Replace ‘No Child’ Act. Retrieved from Washington Post: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/19/us/politics/education-proposal-in-house-could-replace-no-child-act.html?_r=0
Since the No Child Left Behind Act has come into effect, it has caused some concerns with teachers and parents alike on how well it is working for the students. There have been issues to be addressed and instead been overlooked. Because in “Is No Child Left Behind Effective For All Students?” Parents Don’t Think So, a school who fails to meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for four or more years is considered under corrective action and the state board must make serious changes to the school. Randolph and Wilson-Younger, (Oct. 22, 2012). Our government has offered states the chance to waive requirements but the states have to make specific reforms in exchange for flexibility. During the first round of waivers offered, 11 states applied. The states had to fill out applications. Each state must put in an application for a waiver and if a state receives a wavier it will last for two years and then they can reapply. These waivers are needed because the No Child Left Behind is broken. The laws can identify which schools that are in need of improvement based on their achievement targets. The law prescribes interventions but the interventions are not working as well as they could be. Lawmakers have proposed to move a bill to the Senate or House floor. However, the Republicans had p...
In 2002, President George W. Bush passed the “No Child Left Behind Act” which tied in schools’ public funding to standardized tests and enforced the tests in elementary and high schools every year by state education departments. This law also began to put more emphasize on standardized tests which has diminished our level of education and the law “made standardized test scores the primary measure of school quality” (Diane Ravitch 28). Bush hoped this law motivated more students to do well on these exams and teachers to help them prepare better, but it ended up hurting many schools in the process. These exams like the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) should not play such a prominent role in schooling and the government should not make tests the main focal point.
“Making the Grade,” which was published in the Salt Lake Tribune in September of this year, is an article arguing the negative sides of the No Child Left Behind Act. Through this article, a majority of the discussion regarded the budgeting involved with NCLB. This article calls No Child Left Behind a “one-size-fits-all formula for improving education in America” (Making the Grade). According to President Bush, the NCLB Act is “’the cornerstone’ of his administration” (Salt Lake Tribune). Like with any legislation, however, come both positive and negative sides.
The Web. The Web. 18 Feb. 2014. "The Future of Children, Princeton - Brookings: Providing Research and Analysis to Promote Effective Policies and Programs for Children." The Future of Children -.
Lee, Oliver. "Does No Child Left Behind Deserve a Passing Grade?" TakePart. N.p., 6 June 2012. Web. 15 Mar. 2014.
Pulitzer Prize winner for editorial cartoons, David Horsey, in No Child Left Behind, displays the effects of the No Child Left Behind system in schools. Horsey’s purpose is to demonstrate how No Child Left Behind has negative effects in the way schools teach in today’s society. By using contrasting colors and exaggerated images, he illustrates the way schools are forced to teach children in order to prove to American voters that this system needs to be changed. Horsey uses this cartoon to argue that the No Child Left Behind policy is not as salutary to schools and students as it may seem on paper.
The No Child Left Behind Act, a federal social program that tries to encourages after school programs should be eliminated and the extra funds given to schools to decide where it goes.
U.S. Department of Education. (2006). No Child Left Behind executive summary report. Retrieved September 14, 2006 from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/overview/intro/execsumm.html
Stipek, D. (2006). No child left behind comes to preschool. The Elementary School Journal, 106(5), 455-466.