What is amazing about Leeson’s activities is the fact that he was able to accumulate such staggering losses without the management of Baring’s noticing.
Leeson had various roles to play within BSS; he was the general manager, the head trader and the head of the back office. Usually different people perform these tasks, but Baring’s management failed to see the conflict of interests befalling one undertaking multiple roles . Leeson had control over both the trading desk and the clearing and settlement function eliminating the necessary checks and balances usually found within trading organizations, a clear violation of a fundamental principle of risk management. (Herring, 2002)
There was a lack of separation between the front and back offices due to Leeson effectively controlled both sides of the trading operation. From that position he was able to conduct unauthorized trading and subsequently manipulate the number and details of the transactions in which he had engaged, concealing them from Baring’s management. His back office functions were never effectively monitored by management staff and Thus BFS was operated almost entirely by Leeson alone.
The management of Baring’s should have not allowed a single individual to wear multiple hats or have dual control. Management should have realized that this type of arrangement would pose a risk, as a temptation for dishonest trading practices would exist since Leeson was not directly accountable to anyone. Management should therefore, as a precaution, have clearly established responsibility for each business activity and clearly segregated the duties to be performed as this is fundamental to any effective control system. Different individuals should have been appointed to each ...
... middle of paper ...
...
This exhibit tracks the funding of the three companies of BSS in the months leading up to the failure of Barings. Essentially all the funding was used by Leeson to make margin payments to SIMEX. Source: Bank of England.
References:
1. Herring, R. (2002) International Financial Conglomerates: Implications for Bank insolvency Regimes. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
2. Reserve Bank of Australia Bulletin. Implications of the Barings Collapse for Bank supervisors.
3. Barings Debacle,1996. Available from http://www.riskglossary.com [2007, 25 April]
4. Bank of England (1995). Board of Banking Supervision investigation into the
failure of Barings, London: Bank of England.
5. Nick Leeson (2007) - Wikipedia, Available From http://www.Wikipedia.com [21 April 2007]
6. First Bank February 2006 newsletter – Ten years later : Lessons from Barings
Prior to Fuller’s transfer, management at the Carson’s location was poorly run using the classical approach. While this approach can be successful, management has to find a good middle ground between caring for the company and caring about their employees. A traditional classical approach recognizes that there are five important factors to running a successful business (Miller, 19). According to text, these factors are planning, organizing, command, coordination and control (Miller, 19-20). These factors can be seen when you look at Third Bank as a whole. In the study, the CEO saw the issues in his company and put a plan together to improve. He had meetings with management, like fuller, to organize a solution. He then commanded all locations
The novel Liars Poker by Michael Lewis is a very interesting firsthand account of an inside look into the investment banking world, in particular bond trading at the firm Solomon Brothers in the 1980s. Lewis took an interesting and roundabout way to end up on Wall Street, studying art history at Yale and bombing his interview with Lehman Brothers. But he eventually found himself at Solomon Brothers through a lucky encounter with two managing directors wives. Through his book, Michael Lewis conveys the inner workings of investment banks in the 1980s to the average person using his own experience at Solomon Brothers. The book goes into Lewis’s own rise in the firm, as well as the rise and fall of the entire Solomon Brothers Mortgage department.
...ect financial damage to the shareholders of BFC Financial and Bluegreen by encouraging a sell-off due to lack of confidence. Who then causes the most harm, the watched or the watchers?
Charles Keating exceeded Mr. Lindner’s expectations, which persuaded Mr. Lindner to extend an offer to the forty-eight year-old lawyer a position with American Financial in 1972 as the executive vice-president. Under Lindner’s supervision at American Financial in the mid-1970’s, Keating found a resourceful strategy to raise money from the public without the interference of the Wall Street underwriters. The success of this strategy resulted from sharp decline in profits that Lindner’s company was experiencing. Keating’s success revolved around him raising fifty million dollars for American Financial from the public without using an underwriting syndicate.
Atlantic journalist Nicholas Carr confesses that he feels something has been “tinkering with his brain.” The internet, he fears, may be messing with our minds. We have lost the ability to focus on a simple task, and memory retention is steadily declining. He is worried about the effect the internet has on the human brain, and where it may take us in the future. In response to this article, Jamais Cascio, also a journalist for the Atlantic, provides his stance on the issue. He argues that this different way of thinking is an adaptation derived from our environment. Ultimately, he thinks that this staccato way of thinking is simply a natural evolution, one that will help to advance the human race.
This is actually an example of mixed corporate governance. There are independent board members in order to make sure that the operational and financial health of the company can gauged accurately from time to time. Peter Langerman did an in depth enquiry into the financial matters just because Dunlap had offered to resign in response to a trivial question. The board should have kept a watch on the firm’s financial health from the beginning. But after realising the gravity of situation, board was prompt and unanimous in firing Albert Dunlap which shows good corporate governance.
In January 2005, a film was released, called “Are We There Yet?,” that depicted the struggles of a single man trying to be accepted by the woman he adores children. Throughout the movie, one may watch as the protagonist Nick Persons and two children, Kevin and Lindsey, constantly experience tensions, due to the fact that Kevin and Lindsey do not want their mother to bring a new man into her life. As the movie begins, Nick Persons is introduced as a young bachelor who is focused on the growth of his business and a person who has little interest in starting a family. One day while at work, Nick sees Suzanne, the woman of his dreams, although she has two children, a sight which is very repelling to Nick. Because he is fond of her, he becomes willing
Birch’s division managers normally were free to buy materials or inputs from whichever supplier they wished, and even on sales within the company; so divisions were expected to meet the going market price if they wanted the business.
This case study is not about Ms. Stewart direct participation with illegal insider trading as the media had steered the public to believe. To begin, Ms. Stewart received a phone call from Ann Armstrong, her assistant, stating that Peter Bacanovic, her stockbroker, “thinks ImClone is going to start trading down.” (Arnold, Beauchamp, Bowie, 2013, p. 390) Although Ms. Stewart was not able to get a hold of Peter, she talked to his assistance, Douglas Faneuil,
In previous years the big financial institutions that are “too big to fail” have come to realize that they can “cheat” the system and make big money on it by making poor decisions and knowing that they will be bailed out without having any responsibly for their actions. And when they do it they also escape jail time for such action because of the fear that if a criminal case was filed against any one of the so called “too big to fail” financial institutions it...
In his plea bargaining, Ivan Boesky agreed to pay one-hundred million dollars in fines and to fully cooperate with the SEC members in other investigations of insider trading cases. His cooperation has also led to major charges against Kidder Peabody, Martin Siegel, and other financiers. Without Boeskey’s help, catching other insider-trading criminals would have been almost impossible. Ivan Boesky even wrote a book about his involvement in the world of insider trading; he called it Merger Mania.
It is concluded that neither of the above proposals are adequate in that any practical benefit that results from the proposal such as employee and shareholder engagement are outweighed by the theoretical impact of increasing the overlap of the organs which would alter the structure of company law. The legal side of directors’ remuneration appears to be sufficient with the directors’ duties legislation acting as an efficient preventative measure for the problems that directors’ remuneration creates. Furthermore, shareholders already must approve several payments as such this could be strengthened to tackle the issue and employees are to some extent taken care of within s172 as such it is these sections that need development rather than directors’ remuneration.
Organizations that only have top management as the board members are more susceptible to accounting malpractices. Members of the board should preferably own shares in the company to ensure diligence when it comes to the interests of the company. Apart from the Board of Governors, there should also be an audit committee in place to oversee the financial dealings of the bank. Members of the board and the audit committee should have basic financial knowledge. Some of the members should also be experts in finances so that they can detect any anomaly that may take place in terms of financial reporting. An overhaul of the regulatory framework is required to empower authorities to intervene immediately, and make improvements. New technology is required. Manual antiquated processes should be eliminated because this causes greater human error and poor
Gordon and Bud should have had a Strategic plan in motion so that they both knew how to close any deal without having to break the law. I also feel that Gekko and Fox could have used directional plans to close their deals because the way the stock market fluctuates. I feel, it is really important for a stock broker or trader to be flexible, so they can adapt to the fast paced lifestyle of Wall Street. However, I also think that when Fox decides to be Gekko’s apprentice he should have stuck to his morals and beliefs. Bud had his individual goals that he wanted to achieve and although they seemed to be fairly difficult, he still knew that obtaining them was a reality. As Bud began to be more close to Gekko he also became more ruthless and unethical every sale he made. I think that individual goals should be difficult, but not to the point of breaking the law to achieve
Ferguson et al. International financial stability. Geneva: International Center for Monetary and Banking Studies, 2007. Print.