Multiple Personality Disorder Case Study

1009 Words3 Pages

Introduction During the course of the evolution of Psychology, there has been countless theories involving personality. The focus started off as how personality came to be and during what stages of the human life the self becomes fully self realized. As personality theories came to popularize, it became easier to understand certain phenomenon’s that were often seen as demonic possessions or gender biases. However, even with all the psychological advances we’ve made with personality disorders, there are still a few that have very little research behind them. These disorders are typically multiple personality disorder, especially Dissociative Identity Disorder. It’s become an interesting field to study and explore, but because it is so difficult …show more content…

It generally takes around 7 years for these disorders to be diagnosed and because the time span is so long, it’s harder to find. Multiple personality disorder, and in this case for the sack of my paper, Dissociative Identity Disorder, should not be confused with Bipolar Disorder. Although they may fall underneath the same umbrella of study, they are wildly different in …show more content…

Approval was necessary before the study began by an institutional review board, this was obtained before hand and made sure that everything was run ethically. Personal interviews were held anywhere from 30 minutes to a full hour and was recorded to later be transcribed verbatim by one of the research team members. Unfortunately, because the disorder is so difficult to diagnose amongst the general public, but makes up about 29% of the clinical population, the interviews had to be conducted over the phone because everyone lived far away from one another. In order to give voice to the lived experiences of the men living with D.I.D, they utilized a qualitative methodology from a phenomenological paradigm. Because DID is still a highly debated disorder amongst psychologists everywhere, about its existence, a phenomenological approach allows for the assumption that there is no fixed reality but rather reality is viewed through a social constructivist lens in which individuals make meaning of their own lives. With that being said, each participant was a asked a series of open ended questions meant to evoke themes about their individual experiences. Along with these open ended questions, they were given a demographic questionnaire and the Dissociative Experiences Scale–II sent via e-mail. The DES-II consists of 28 items that require participants to self-report experiences on how

Open Document