Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Synopsis of the book Thief
Synopsis of the book Thief
Synopsis of the book Thief
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
As Markus Zusak once said through the words of his character, Death, “* * * HERE IS A SMALL FACT * * * You are going to die,” (Zusak 3). While this may seem like a jarring statement to suddenly hear while going about life, in reality, everyone in his or her right mind knows that death will eventually come. Each and every life will reach an end at some point in time or another, and our kindred will be the ones left to deal with the aftermath. There is no eluding death. Even though some may try to overlook this actuality, mortality is not vague at all, especially for characters living in the world of The Book Thief. This New York Times best-seller and award winning novel is set in 1939, Nazi Germany and follows the main character, Liesel Meminger, …show more content…
However, as sentient beings, they are dramatically affected emotionally and mentally. Specifically, persona Hans Hubermann is left feeling that he owes his life to Erik Vandenburg, who died in World War I after incidentally saving his life. As a repercussion of his guilt, Hans surmises that he is responsible to aid Erik’s family in any way they may entail. 20 years later, Hans’ proposed deal is finally undertaken when Max Vandenburg, a Jew, seeks refuge in the Hubermann residence during the Holocaust. This situation exhibits the motif that guilt is life affecting because of how Hans is willing to put his entire life and family at risk in order to pay his self-imposed debt to Erik Vandenburg. Similarily, Hans also aches from guilt when Max is forced to depart ways after Hans offers a piece of bread to a Jew during a march to Dachau. Hans was then overwhelmed with self-condemnation, and “he waited for the Gestapo, the soldiers, the police – for anyone – to take him away, as he felt he deserved,” (Zusak 399). Hans repeatedly questioned himself for what he did, and he was flabbergasted at the mistake he made. Ergo, the characterization of Hans exemplifies how guilt can take a large toll on your identity. However, Hans is not the only character experiencing guilt throughout the …show more content…
The beginning of Max’s shame develops from the point he leaves his family behind when his German friend, Walter Kugler, comes to save him during Kristallnacht. Afterwards, Max is overwhelmed with the remorse of abandoning his family, even though it was his only chance of survival. This leads nightmares about Max ‘betraying’ his family to plague his sleep. “If only he’d turned for one last look at his family as he left the apartment. Perhaps then the guilt would not have been so heavy. No final goodbye,” (Zusak 193), a quote from Death, impeccably epitomizes the severity of Max’s guilt. Max knew that his family would have next-to-no chance of survival, and his guilt of being the only one to live cogently illustrates the theme that survivors’ guilt can considerably impact someone’s personality and life. Furthermore, Max also experiences a great extent of guilt when living with the Hubermann’s. "I'm so selfish," explained Max, "leaving my people behind. Coming here. Putting all of you in danger… I’m sorry. Do you believe me? I’m so sorry, I’m so sorry," (Zusak 218). This quote patently shows how Max feels like he is a burden to the family. He believes that he should have died years ago and that he doesn’t even deserve the poor conditions in which he lives because of how he is putting the family at such great risk. Evidently, this additionally exemplifies the
Hans supports the Jewish community, who are viewed as ‘undesirables subhumans’ by society. The ethical values which Hans holds are apparent in the way he treats starving and helpless Jews traveling through Molching, “The Jew stood before him, expecting another handful of derision, but he watched with everyone else as Hans Hubermann held his hand out and presented a piece of bread” (Zusak 395). As a consequence of rejecting societal expectations and ideologies, the character Hans Hubermann solidifies the notion that every individual deserves basic human respect. Therefore, Hans develops a love for humanity and the individual he is helping through refusing to obey corrupt societal expectations. Aiding those who are injured is a gateway to love as it changes the world for the individual one is
Markus Zusak’s novel The Book Thief depicts the life of a certain young German girl named Liesel Meminger during World War II. Her story was told through the eyes of Death, who narrates both the blessings and devastation that occurred during that era. Liesel experiences living with her new foster parents and come across a boy named Rudy Steider who will later on become her best friend. As the story unfolds, Liesel gradually discovers the horrifying truth behind the Nazi regime as her foster parents take refuge of a Jewish man. Despite being in the midst of destruction and recently coping from her traumatic background, she undertakes on a journey of self-discovery and
Guilt is one of the most powerful forces known to man. It can drive the average man into a paranoia struck fool, ravenous for stability. Guilt can cause people to cave in from under them, revealing an empty and hollow shell. As children, we are conditioned to feel guilty when we do something wrong. As we get older, we learn that we receive praise and acceptance when we behave properly, or as is expected of us. Because humans have a strong desire to be loved and accepted, we do things in order to receive approval. Vera Claythorne was one of the characters mostly affected by guilt. She would constantly get hysteria attacks because of the guilt she carried. She often imagined Hugo was near. General Macarthur had very strong guilt as well, so
Strong emotions towards another can cause one to act irrationally. In The Book Thief by Markus Zusak Rudy, Liesel, and her foster father Hans develop strong emotions towards others that cause them to act rashly. Rudy’s, Liesel’s, and Hans’s actions illustrate the unreasonable actions caused by strong feelings towards another.
Christopher McCandless, an American traveler, once said “So many people live within unhappy circumstances and yet will not take the initiative to change their situation because they are conditioned to a life of security, conformity, and conservation, all of which may appear to give one peace of mind, but in reality, nothing is more damaging to the adventurous spirit.” This quote is far more universally applicable than originally thought to be. Throughout one’s life, one will undoubtedly experience some form of conformity. The driving factor in a majority of these moments is fear; fear of not fitting in, or of not living up to society’s expectations. The only thing that lets one escape conformity is the truth known from past experiences. This
“‘Book burning’ refers to the ritual destruction by fire of books or other written materials. Usually carried out in a public context, the burning of books represents an element of censorship and usually proceeds from a cultural, religious, or political opposition to the materials in question.” (United States Holocaust Memorial Museum)
All thanks to his friend Walter kugler. Walter is Max 's best friend. Walter and Max started battling each other growing up, yet soon got to be companions. In the early phases of the Holocaust, Walter helps Max avoid the Nazis and organizes Max to stay at Hans Hubermann 's place. Even though Max is going through tough times he is able to keep a strong relationship with walter. Despite the fact that Max is experiencing extreme times he can keep a solid relationship with walter. Secondly is the relationship Max has with Liesel. In spite of the fact that Liesel is apprehensive meeting Max to begin, they soon turn out to be great companions. They share bad dreams as their first talk together. Max has left his family and Liesel has lost her sibling. Sharing their mishaps the two get to be associated through sharing their souls and the printed word. Liesel instructs Max that he can express his sketchy identity through words. "i have hated the words and i have loved them, and i hope i have made them right” (528). Max and Liesel have grown to love and learn from one another. Lastly, is the relationship Max has with Hans before leaving them. Max left since Hans has shown love for a Jew in a parade, and Max realized that Hans ' home would be hunted by the NSDAP down evidence of
The feeling of guilt can be revealed through Hans’ character due to the death of his friend, Erik Vandenburg. For example, after Erik’s death, Hans felt responsible to visit his family. When he came back from the war, Hans told Erik’s wife, ““You know,” Hans explained to her, “he saved my life.” [...] “He—if there’s anything you ever need.” He
Hans Hubermann was directly described as a lover of Jews, because he did not believe that Jews were being treated fairly, in fact they were treated as less than animals being whipped, malnourished, and forced to work in harsh conditions. Hans treated Jewish people just like everyone else, he showed fairness to everyone, death said, “ He was a man who appreciated fairness” (Zusak 180). He put his life on the line many times trying to stand up for Jews. When there was a parade of Jews walking down the street, the brave Hans Hubermann tried to give one of the Jews a piece of bread, and instead of being applauded for this good deed he he got a flaming whip on his back. Even though Hans was whipped, death said, “If nothing else, the old man would die like a human. Or at least the thought that he was a human” (395). Hans was very secretive about his life during World War I, so without knowing the story about how Erik Vandenburg saved Hans’ life, one would not understand just how much equality and fairness meant to Hans. It was Hans’ fairness, generosity, and loyalty that made Hans different from all of the other characters in The Book Thief, as he remained the same while true to
The Death the reader befriends in The Book Thief is far from the Death s/he previously feared to see standing over him or her in the twilight hours of life. We are haunted by him and him by us. As a group, we form the opposite ends of a spectrum: A species with the infinite ability to love and hate, create and destroy, burn and build, and the eternal metaphysical being who must witness the entire process, never truly being able to grasp what it means to live, but ever loving those who do.
Words hold great power and when used correctly can influence what people believe and how they act.
As an innate experience of being human, characterization of death is an element that often permeates many literary works. However, in The Book Thief, Zusak provides a unique lens through which his personification of Death rejects the traditional Grim Reaper trope. While it may be his job to collect the souls of the deceased, Death is no “scythe” wielding, “black robe” wearing entity with “skull-like facial features” (Zusak 307). He “urge(s)” the reader to “trust [him]” for he is nothing if not “amiable. Agreeable.
Death is a very well-known figure that is feared by many in all countries. He is suspected of being cruel, disturbing and all synonyms of horrifying. Death is inevitable and that is the most fearing aspect of his persona. In Markus Zusak’s The Book Thief, Death is made to seem or resemble humans. Effectively using the narration role, Death introduces a unique description and definition of colors in which he uses as a tool to effectively engage the readers to the events occurring throughout the book. He also demonstrates him personal and different experiences as well, mostly about soul gathering and the implications of WWII that have affected him. On the contrary to Death’s dead, appalling and scary nature that many interpret him to be during the book, Death shows many emotions and features to his personality that reasoning would declare otherwise. One of those feature would be the colors.
Envision a world where evil has taken over, simply because decent people are willing to do nothing to oppose the evil that is taking over. The idea is not far off from reality, because many people believe evil is prevails when decent people do nothing. Among these people was Edmund Burke, who once said, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” He meant that injustice will continue to take place when good people don’t choose to fight against injustices. Many people agree with Burke, because true events have occurred that support Burke’s statement. Some people disagree, because they believe that even when righteous people intervene, evil will continue to prosper. However, Burke is correct in his statement
Bruner, T. (2012). Pascal Bruckner—Guilt in Western Consciousness With Perspectives from Karl Jaspers and Viktor Frankl. Existenz, 7.