Moral Obligations In Antigone

1032 Words3 Pages

Moral Obligations vs. Ruling a Kingdom Hegel’s perspective of Sophocles’ Antigone is accurate in stating that at the center of the tragedy there is a collision between one-sided positions rather than the collapse of one tragic hero. This is best exemplified in Sophocles’ Antigone when two factions battle over the proper way to dispose of a person who was both a family member and an enemy of the state. Looking at each standpoint, both embody some form of selflessness and good. King Kreon was acting on behalf of the people to protect the kingdom from an enemy while Antigone was acting for her family by trying to honor her brother with a proper burial. When analyzed from different perspectives, both King Kreon and Antigone’s actions are equally …show more content…

This action of honoring a past family member is an action that many perform and is widely accepted. When discussing the issue with her sister Ismene, Antigone points out that King Kreon “has no business keeping me from what is mine” (48). As his sister, Antigone deserves the right to horror the rights over her loved one and give Polyneices a proper burial. Regardless of the actions Polyneices performed, the end result justified the means at no matter the cost. Antigone states that “I shall bury him. To me it is fine to die performing such a deed” (71-72). Despite the edict that the King issues against burying Polyneices, Antigone forgoes any consequences that she faces and makes the decision to act on her brother’s behalf. This sense of obligation is what drives her to go against the King. She goes as far as saying that she is willing to die performing this deed because she knows that it is the just thing to do. Antigone does not feel the need to cooperate with King Kreon because he is not the one she needs to please. She explains …show more content…

Someone who invades the city and tries to bring it down should not be given a proper burial. If King Kreon chose to give an enemy a proper burial, he would be sending the wrong message to his people that enemies of the state will be honored despite their actions. He states that “never shall evil man be held in higher honor than the just” (207-208). King Kreon is making the point that someone who commits an evil crime should not be given the same respect and honor as a just citizen who follows laws and cooperates with the state. As the King of Thebes, Kreon explains that he has the duty to protect the state. “I would not keep silent if I saw some doom instead of safety moving on the people of this town; nor would I ever count a man as my own friend who felt ill will towards this land” (185-188). Kreon emphasizes that his duty as King would not allow him to honor an enemy of the state or recognize that person as a friend. For the good of Thebes, he cannot allow anyone who has hatred towards to land be honored and recognized. When speaking to Antigone about her actions, King Kreon notes that he “loathes when someone caught performing evil wants to glorify the deed” (495-496). This explains why he felt the need to punish anyone who attempted to bury Polyneices after the evil he committed. In addition to King Kreon’s own opinions on the matter, he also has the

Open Document