Montgomery Bus Boycott: The Power Of Social Habits

1172 Words3 Pages

Social Habits deals with how we relate with our peers, environment and the community at large. Social habits is based upon the inaugurating ties, which are the information-carrying connections between people. It has been established in Power of Habits, Charles Duhigg and other personal experiences that social habits are necessary for starting and boosting a movement. Taking references from Chapter eight (8) which discusses about American icon Rosa Parks, thrown into jail for her refusal to give up her seat on the Bus for a white man. This caused a civil rights crusade thereafter, giving rise to the boycott movements which main members include Rosa Parks, Martin Luther King Jr, Clifford Durr (Lawyer), E.D Nixon and Mrs. Nixon. This crusade …show more content…

Phase one (1) talks about starting a movement with close friends, acquaintances and strong ties. People close to Rosa Parks, like E.D Nixon (Mr. and Mrs.) started the rally by spreading information about the injustice of the white people, explaining how they threw a Negro lady in prison all because she did not give up her seat on the bus for a white man to sit. They started by distributing flyers to members of the community, as they tried to acquire more volunteers to assist them in their rally so their voices would be heard. The second phase deals with conveying information through friends of friends trying to spread the word. For instance, when E.D Nixon called Martin Luther King Jr, being the pastor of his church and a very influential man, to volunteer himself and his church and be part of the movement, giving the movement the support it needed. The third phase, motion phase, describing the drive of the movement, explaining to the gathering that the fight is not for Rosa Park alone but for everyone. The fight is for civil rights and integration is beneficial for everybody as a …show more content…

This movement started when we were complaining in the cafeteria about the food we were given, being both unhealthy and tasted unpleasant. Terry started his mini-movement by assembling a group of his friends (I, being among) to the Principal’s office to address the situation. However, the principal, told us we had to obtain a minimum of hundred students (100) to sign the petition. This led to phase two (2) where we, together as a team, needed to split up and rally additional people to try and sign the sheet. We hosted events explaining the inedible and revolting food served in the cafeteria. By two (2) weeks, progress was slow. We only had approximately thirty-five (35) signatures. We needed an instigator, a motivator, a popular yet a powerful person in the school. For this reason, we decided to convince Andy (serenest and the coolest fellow in the school wannabe), being a friend of my friend which is an assured weak tie. Andy had this talent of convincing anybody giving smart, logical reasoning. Surprisingly, Andy had the same intentions of campaigning to change the cafeteria food, but never acquired the support. This made it quite stress-free to convince and add him to the crew giving the crew the sustenance it needed. This progressed to phase three (3), where we were obligated to convince the students practically in the school the importance of

Open Document