Monopolies In Healthcare

464 Words1 Page

Two great examples of privately and publicly funded healthcare systems in the world would be the US and the UK. Both governments have roles to play by balancing the supply and demand of services, preventing failures within the market in the form of monopolies, exploitation or price fixing. Both have significant differences to their approach at healthcare. Incentives for each healthcare systems were rated into two types of financial incentives, rewards and penalties. These financial incentives are judged to be less acceptable. Both countries favor rewards over any penalties and it comes from the medical care that is offered. Treatment programs provided for various illnesses can help with income rewards vs just straight medical care. The National Health System has existed in the UK for well over fifty years. It offers a healthcare system that is free for everyone at the point of delivery. This type of healthcare is funded by the taxpayers as a benefit …show more content…

Our federal government ensures that public there is public access to emergency type services regardless of what their ability to pay is. The US also has publicly funded programs for healthcare that cater mainly to the elderly, children, and the low income or poor population. The role of the government should be to supply free services to the best of their ability. Policies are put into place to help with supply and demand. Both countries run monopolies on healthcare at some point on some level. While even medical facilities, like hospitals, might create localized monopolies because there may not be another alternative offering the same services they are. These monopolies can create economic carelessness due to social loss from retaining higher profits from personal gain. Which is why the government should be involved as a regulatory body to ensure that contracts are fair with facilities and

Open Document