Mineralogy Of An Ore-Body Analysis

884 Words2 Pages

Understanding the mineralogy of the ore-body is essential as this knowledge enables one to predict how a mineral will behave during processing. Modern process mineralogy techniques are conducted by using all available mineral and ore characterisation techniques and instruments available, with each technique building onto the next ensuring meaning and accurate results are obtained.
All process mineralogical tests begin by defining the geometallurgical units. Lotter et al, (2003), defined geometallurgical units as ore type or group of ore types that encompasses a distinctive set of textural and compositional properties, which can be used to determine the processing behaviour of similar units. These units are based on review of geological data including host rock, alteration, grain sizes, texture, structural geology, grade, sulphide mineralogy and metal ratios with focus on characteristics which are known to affect metallurgical performance (Lotter et al, 2003; 2011).
The next step is to ensure representative sampling such that meaningful diagnoses of untreated samples and/ or extracted sample from production concentrator are attained. According to Lotter, (2011), unoxidised drill core samples, are the best representative of the geometullurgical unit it was extracted from. This is critical step in ensuring accuracies of QEMSCAN and LMA data. Representatively is accomplished by thoroughly mixing the sample and subsequently splitter the sample into replicate subsamples using a rotatory splitter (Lotter et al, 2003; Lotter & Whittake, 2004; Lotter, 2011).
Modern process mineralogy follows a set strategy to ensure accurate and meaningful mineralogical measurements are taken. Method development in ore characterization test during pre-f...

... middle of paper ...

... processing. The QEMSCAN comes equipped with theoretical compositions that do not take into account heterogeneity between mineral phases. The theoretical compositions will suffice for all other quantitative measurements performed by the QEMSCAN beside the elemental deportment measurements. This short coming is overcome by making use of the accurate compositional data that can be acquired from EMPA analysis. The compositional information of individual mineral phases is added to the QEMSCAN to refine the elemental deportment data. The composition data from the microprobe can also be used to update species identification protocol (SIP file).
All of the analytical instruments mentioned above all have their short coming, which is noted in Table 1, but combining these individual instruments in a methodical manner eliminates the majority of their individual limitations.

More about Mineralogy Of An Ore-Body Analysis

Open Document