Michael Joseph O’Rahilly and the 1916 Easter Rising in Ireland

1719 Words4 Pages

The role of Michael Joseph O’Rahilly (also known as “The O’Rahilly”) in the Easter Rising of 1916, is not much talked about, and this, in my opinion, makes it all the more fascinating. Many would feel, that he has, in a sense, been ‘written out of history’.

O’Rahilly was a man who believed that the Irish people could not achieve independence of the British without confrontation in an armed struggle. It was for this reason that he joined played a large part in the foundation of the Irish Volunteers in 1913.

Interestingly, O’Rahilly refused to join the Irish Republican Brotherhood (IRB) on the grounds that he could not join a secret society. He was a man of very strong principles, and felt that he could not keep an oath whereby he would have to withhold information from his wife, Nancy, which would be of ‘vital concern’ to both of them: ‘There is only one “secret society” I would advocate, and it would have only one rule; everyone in it must get a gun and learn to shoot.’.

Perhaps one of the reasons O’Rahilly’s story has, for the most part, gone untold, is because he ‘wouldn’t have suited either side’. By this it is meant, that clearly as a Republican, he wouldn’t suit the British’s telling of events, whilst, as he was against this particular strike at freedom, he didn’t particularly suit the Irish. This feeling of a ‘reluctant rebel’, is perhaps a good meter of how most people reacted to the Rising; whilst they were initially against the idea, once it had begun, they felt obliged to join in.

Our journey begins, with the, so-called “Castle Document”. This was a forged document, supposedly having been leaked from British Intelligence in Dublin Castle in an attempt to force Eoin Mac Neill and the Irish Volunteers to join the p...

... middle of paper ...

... his execution said: ‘I envy O’Rahilly: that is how I wanted to die.’. Ironically, even though O’Rahilly didn’t think they would last more than 36 hours, after 5 days, he never saw them surrender. As his death was diluted by the public outcry at the executions which followed, many began to question his right to have the title “The”. Those however, who knew him well, and who were involved at the time, knew better than to criticize him at all. In fact, Desmond FitzGerald later commissioned W.B. Yeats to write a poem about O’Rahilly, which he did. The following extract shows the much deserved respect which he had attained from the people of the time: ‘Sing of the O’Rahilly, do not deny his right; Sing a “the” before his name; allow that he despite all those learned historians, established it for good; He wrote out that word himself, he christened himself with blood.’

Open Document