Mercury, Argus, And Io Analysis

1876 Words4 Pages

More than paint, more than canvas, art is influenced by the expression of human creativity and imagination resulting from the will and desire of the artist. As an artist carefully applies obscured devices to create their work, the writer, through the use of rhetoric, fashions their work to portray their perspective and perception. Within each intensional and maneuvered stroke of the artist, he or she further depicts their concept or purpose. The same applies to the work of the writer; each line is carefully crafted and calculated to deliver their message. The painting Mercury, Argus, and Io by Salvator Rosa demonstrates the use rhetoric creating both a sinister and dark scene while also depicting abandonment and isolation. These two descriptions …show more content…

Within the primary essay, convoluted sentences are used on numerous of occasions. Convoluted sentences allow the passage to possess importance located at the beginning and end. Convoluted syntax also provides detail towards the scene but particularly the middle portion of the sentence. An example of convoluted syntax which exercises pauses can be seen periodically, “A twisted tree trunk protrudes out of the silt like earth, covered in crude knots and lanky dead branches, hover over the small stretch of land it’s rotting roots are positioned in.” The separation causes the beginning and end to hold more importance and to be emphasised by the interruption. The repeated use of convoluted syntax gives the sentences a rhythmical and somewhat choppy feeling. The separation of clauses, combined with details, also provide a break that adds to the anticipation and obscurity of the painting, in turn portraying the dominant impression. Another use of convoluted syntax incorporating a sense of obscurity can be seen within the following phrase, “The ridge on the top of the towering stones, a vast forest of wild grass and hovering trees stretch as far as the colossal mountain range in the distance, cast a shadow over the land.” The clause is broken apart by the detailed description of the forest, therefore it provides an extensive break from the main clause. The effect this creates …show more content…

While similes within the essay are beneficial to the description of the scene, they do not depict the mood or the author's purpose. The simile “The cow's coat is as white as freshly fallen snow reflecting off the midday sun,” does not represent the feeling of abandonment or forgottenness in which the essay is portraying. While the simile can be seen as descriptive and providing a familiar basis through comparisons in which the reader can relate, it does not function properly within the text. Another example of figurative language which does not effectively portray the dominant impression is within the use of personification, “At the base of the closest towering peak sits a city, exposed by the light softly kissing the countryside.” This use of personification does not apply to the mood or any form of detachment, and while it may be effective in the sense of juxtaposing the surrounding text, the personifying of the light is not necessary. Giving the light human characteristics does not influence the reader toward the dominant impression and is not needed. Its use might confuse or obscure the desired perspective of seclusion to the reader, therefore this use of personification is not beneficial to the essay. Using figurative language is an essential aspect to create rhetoric, however,

Open Document