Malcolm Gladwell 10 000 Hours Research Paper

1830 Words4 Pages

Ayomide Awodu
Professor Zearfoss
Composition I
2 April 2016
The 10,000 Hours Rule: Fact or Fiction
While it is common knowledge that practice and dedication play a huge role in a person’s eventual success, Malcolm Gladwell, in his bestselling non-fiction book, takes this one step further by arguing that one cannot be a master in one’s field without first practicing for a specific amount of time. He subsequently provides different stories and anecdotes to support his theory. While, the idea of extended practice improving skills and playing a big role in the achievement of success has some merit, Gladwell’s argument that 10,000 hours is the minimum requirement for excellence in any field is erroneous as he does not include compelling research, …show more content…

The author cites Mozart, The Beatles, Bill Joy, Bill Gates, and world-class violinists and attributes their success to the fact that they accomplished the minimum level or 10,000 hours of practice in their respective areas of interest. Gladwell mentions the earlier research conducted by Daniel Levitin and K. Anders Ericsson in an attempt to prove that his theory is applicable to all fields. K. Anders Ericsson, a professor of psychology at Florida State University and whose study Gladwell based his 10,000 rule disagrees. He emphasizes that not all practice is applicable; time spent has to be deliberate and focused on improvement. Examples Gladwell gave in his book such as programming and playing ice hockey matches simply do not count. “It’s not a matter of simply taking part in an activity. Sports people have other considerations, for instance, there are physical limits on how much dedicated practice is possible”. By referencing earlier studies involving “composers, basketball players, fiction writers, ice skaters, concert pianists…” (Gladwell 40) Gladwell attempts to erroneously prove that the 10,000 hour rule is applicable in every area of …show more content…

Though many people would like to believe otherwise, science has proven that not every individual is equal in terms of ability. Just like an individual might have a genetic predisposition for alcoholism or addiction, another individual would be more likely to excel in sports or in the arts simply because of key traits he inherited from his parents. Psychologist Miriam Mosing studied more than 10,000 twins and had them estimate the amount of time they had devoted to music practice and complete tests of basic music abilities. It was discovered that although the music abilities were influenced by genes (38 percent, on average), there was no evidence they were influenced by practice. For a pair of identical twins, the twin who practiced music more did not do better on the tests than the twin who practiced less. Biologist Michael Lombardo and psychologist Robert Deane examined the biographies of male and female Olympic sprinters such as Jesse Owens, Marion Jones, and Usain Bolt, and found that, in all cases, they were exceptional compared with their competitors from the very start of their sprinting careers before they had accumulated much more practice than their peers. The results of these studies indicate that while practice does matter, there are limits on its improvement power. People are not created equal

Open Document