Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Demystifying Making A Murderer
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Demystifying Making A Murderer
We all love a good murder mystery. As morbid as it sounds, the suspense, thrill, and mystery in many of today’s true crime documentaries keep us coming back for more. Netflix’s new documentary series, “Making A Murderer,” follows the trials and tribulations of a small town man, Steven Avery, in his crusade for ‘justice.’ Avery was wrongfully convicted of rape, and served 18 years in prison until DNA exoneration freed him, but his freedom didn’t last long. The documentary follows a generic plotline: you’re spoon-fed facts about the Avery family’s oppression and hardships in the community, and listen to them reminisce about the 18 years lost; you end up sympathizing with the family. Now that you’re hooked, they hit you with Steven’s second …show more content…
Producers of true crime documentaries take advantage of this by presenting emotionally-charged testimonies, anecdotes, and pictures that tear at our heartstrings. It’s important to remember this documentary, like many others, was designed with the clear goal of freeing Steven Avery again. The viewer is presented with solid facts, which make Steven Avery look like the victim in most cases. His wrongdoings are minimized, while his grievances maximized. For instance, Steven’s defence team picked over his previous case, finding any discrepancies or violations imposed by the Wisconsin department of justice (DOJ). The investigators are presented as being incompetent and unjust. The list of misconduct evidence against the DOJ extends, making an objective view effortful. The DOJ is portrayed as the enemy, and when police brutality is on the rise this isn’t a difficult feat. Opinions are made and conclusions drawn. Society’s obsession with true crime leads to many stories following the same plot line: a popular outlet presents a side of the story we resonate with, causing us to feel the need to take action. Social media blows up, petitions are signed, protests occur, and fan theories come up: all with a specific agenda. True crime documentaries such as “Making A Murderer” appeal to our emotions and often lead us to draw premature conclusions with our newly discovered education in criminal
This movie really tied everything we’ve been discussing in class and seeing it unfold was actually really eye opening. I found it important going forward to make sure I do not fall into that tunnel vision mentality and to make sure I follow the evidence rather than fitting the suspect to the evidence. Again, I found it interesting like in the Norfolk Four case and in the Central Park 5 case police neglected to look at surrounding crime areas to see if any other cases matched the same modus operandi. If the police did look at surrounding cases they would have established a link between previous assaults and the assault that took place in the park that night. I was amazed how the detectives did not connect how each of the confessions varied by who did what and how they attacked the victim. It was Korey Wise in the video that kept putting up his hand when asked how big was the rock and he was just moving them back and forth. Police also neglected to look at the attack patterns of where the group first was hassling people in the park. They would have found that the boys were at one end of the park, while the victim was being attacked and there was no way they could have been in two places at once. I also found troubling during the time was the media portrayal of the Central Park 5, how they were painted as vicious young men, who brutally attacked a harmless white women. Even after each one of them was exonerated from the crime the media still portrayed them as vicious men. As we discussed in class, I think a lawyer like a magistrate should be available 24/7 when it comes to juveniles, because I believe that this five did not know their Miranda Rights and what they were entitled. If they knew what their rights were I believe the confessions never would have happened and none of them would have gone to
Murder at the Margin is a murder mystery involving various economic concepts. The story takes place in Cinnamon Bay Plantation on the Virgin Island of St. John. It is about Professor Henry Spearman, an economist from Harvard. Spearman organizes an investigation of his own using economic laws to solve the case.
“Murder on a Sunday Morning” directed by the documentary filmmaker Jean-Xavier de Lestrade, is a documentary film based on the false conviction of an innocent 15-year-old black African-American teenager, Brendon Butler, who got arrested when he was on his way to a job interview. The case originated from the assassination of a tourist from Georgia, Mary Ann Stephens, who at the time of the incident was 65 years old and was shot dead while she was on vacation in Jacksonville, Florida in May of 2000 with her husband. This film emphasizes multiple errors made by the police and witness during the arrest and trial of Brendon. Also displays the erroneous eyewitness identification, the non-orthodox interrogations, moreover the false confession written
The media’s ideological perception of hero was almost always cops and prosecutors enthusiastically labouring to sew up the moral and social structure on television. Viewers enjoyed these characters hugging our screens, and devotedly follow them week after week as they appear with yet another criminal to prosecute. Admirers take pleasure in seeing yet another mutilated corps appearing in CSI-land. The ...
Steven A. Avery was born in Manitowoc County Wisconsin on July, 9,1962. In the year 1985, he was convicted of sexual assault. Victim, Penny Beernsten was assaulted while jogging down a beach in Manitowoc County Wisconsin. Her description of the suspect led the police into pointing fingers towards Steven Avery. He was then arrested, found guilty and sentenced to 32 years in jail for first-degree sexual assault. I believe Steven Avery was innocent because, he was in a completely different location when the sexual assault took place, Law enforcements did not investigate another possible assailant, lastly his DNA did not match the DNA on the crime scene.
Throughout the entire film, viewers can witness how Steven Avery is being poorly treated because of his socioeconomic status, and the fact that he is different from everyone in the Manitowoc County. Steven was lied on, picked on, and accused of committing a crime he did not commit, all because he was looked down upon and viewed as being less of a person than everyone else in the community. Watching this episode invokes an emotion that is prevalent today with our justice system. Many minorities are falsely accused and falsely imprisoned due to personal vendettas from private citizens or members of the law enforcement. Many are disfranchised due to their socioeconomic status. There are many innocent men and women serving life sentences and on death row for crimes they did not commit. In the year of 2007, Devontae Sanford, who was just 14 years old at the time, was wrongfully convicted of a crime and sentenced 90 years in
...who commits the crimes seems to show no remorse, making them seem heartless and almost inhumane. It makes you question your own judgement, showing that we should not judge a book by its cover.
On December 18th 2015 Netflix aired with great popularity a 10 part documentary series called “making a Murderer” The documentary, written by Laura Ricciardi and Moira Demo, present the case of Steven Avery; a convicted murderer exonerated on DNA evidence after serving 18 years for the assault and attempted murder of Penny Beerntsen. The writers present the series in a way that suggest that Avery was framed by the Manitowoc Country police department. and present that the police planted evidence to frame Steven Avery because he had been exonerated from the previous crime. The ethical problem with this as is presented by Kathryn Schulz in The New Yorker, is that the documentary argues their case so passionately that they leave out important
The title, Getting away with murder, is significant because it gives the reader a foreshadow as to what happens in the end. African American, Emmett Till's, murderer's are set free based solely on their skin color. The title gives us an insight on how unfair things were in the deep south in 1955. Many blacks lost their lives because they "stepped out of line" The title not only works for this book, and this story, but for all African Americans that were killed during this dangerous and unfair time. Before the Civil Rights Movement, when a was white on trial against a black, the white was always acquitted. At the first glance, the title doesn't have a huge meaning, it's just another book title, but, after reading this book, the title has so much more impact. It gives the reader something to think about. Once the book has been read, and the title is looked at again, all different emotions of anger and confusion bombard the reader. Rather than an first, they thought it was just someone obviously getting away with a crime. Getting Away
Although the criminal justice system punishes those who have committed crimes against society, there are still flaws in the system that send innocent people to prison. Actual Innocence by Barry Scheck, Peter Neufeld, and Jim Dwyer, focuses on those problems connected to the incarceration of innocent people, as well as those who have been convicted and were ultimately exonerated. Confessions and racism are two major issues that are described in Actual Innocence that explain how these problems occur in our criminal justice system today and how innocent people are convicted of crimes.
Despite the prominence and success of over sixty innocence projects in United States, there is no literatures discussing how these organizations operate, what resources or factors contribute to their success and what challenges they much overcome (Krieger, S.A 2007). The Innocence Project’s groundbreaking use of DNA technology to free innocent people has provided irrefutable proof that wrongful convictions are not isolated or rare events but instead arise from systemic defects (Innocence Project, 2014). The innocence project is a nonprofit organization that is being run by attorneys w...
Whether appearing on breaking news headlines, or vividly depicted in mainstream contemporary entertainment, murder and the act of murdering are no foreign concept to the public. But, one thought still perplexes our mind: “How can someone ever think of committing such a heinous act?”. In The Murderer Next Door: Why the Mind is Designed to Kill by David M. Buss, he explains the mind’s inner workings that can compel us to find murder as actually, a rational thing to do. He breaks the preconceived idea and definition of what it takes to be a murderer, such as only the mentally insane can be murders (brought on by only shocking/”news-worthy” depictions of serial killers/ psychopaths in today’s movies, games , or news) or that today’s mainstream media
The article “The Murder They Heard” written by Stanley Milgram and Paul Hollander is a response to the article that Martin Gansberg “38 Who Saw Murder Didn’t Call the Police”. Milgram and Hollander explain why they do not agree that the neighbors of Catherine Genovese should have called the police. Milgram and Hollander give reasons why they disagree with Gansberg, and why I should agree with what they are saying. After reading both articles, I felt very conflicted with who I agree with, but after much deliberation, I realized that I agree more with Milgram and Hollander. The neighbors should not be blamed for Genovese’s death. We should try to understand why they did not call the police. There are a few things you need to take into consideration,
In the modern world, how people perceive and act in relation to crime and criminals is influenced and shaped by the media. The print media’s representations of certain crimes such as child sexual abuse, and the discourses used in presenting child sexual abusers “work in the background, in [the] unconscious mind” (Trend, p.63) to influence readers to “make subtle changes in [their] attitudes” (Trend, p.63) towards crime and certain criminals. Not only does the media shape the view of crimes and their committers amongst society, but it also leads to criticisms of the legal system’s ability to deal with criminals. The print media also tends to perpetrate a myth of ‘crime wave’ through the, in most cases, false representations of increase in crime and crime rates. Through this, the media gives itself the power to abnormalize and normalize certain acts by declaring offenders as ill persons requiring treatment as well as being the differing ‘others’ who do not comply with certain ‘normalized’ behaviour . Many members of society however do not recognize how media representations and influence can damage and ‘retard’ society’s embedded culture and the perception of justice (Dyer: 2000, p. 84). Through the media’s use of expert opinion on certain crimes, what they present is strongly trusted by society, making the media the most crucial body in spreading knowledge about, misrepresenting and badly deforming the character of crime and criminals (Dyer 2000, p.87).
Well-Schooled in Murder is a text written by Elizabeth George, shows the hierarchy in elite public schools and how they affect people. Matthew Whateley disappears one day and is assumed killed, and his roommates, Arlens, Wedge and Smythe Andrews, are interviewed, due to it being a mystery. Matthew was quite different than the other pupils. He didn’t follow their traditions and kept to himself. It’s one big mystery, and you would category the text as a crime mystery novel.