MC Electric Case Study

1362 Words3 Pages

Case Study B For MC Electric, the legal question involved would be: is the agreement (contract) that Dortmund made with GB Circuits Co binding and enforceable? And did Dortmund, as an agent, have the apparent and/or actual authority to make a binding agreement with GB on behalf of MC Electric? Thus, a determination needs to be made as to whether MC Electric is required to pay GB the 50% commission on the deal. When determining whether or not the agreement is enforceable, the area of law involved would contract law and more specifically, the laws of agency because Dortmund appeared to act as an agent for MC Electric. There are two rules/principles of law that apply to agents like Dortmund and his actions. The first legal principle has to do …show more content…

Dortmund 's employment contract stated that, as the director of sales, he was responsible for managing employees and promoting sales, but pricing decisions and overall sales strategy were left to the president. This suggests that Dortmund may not have had the actual authority to make an agreement with GB. The point of debate here would be whether or not “promoting sales” is too broad of a term to diminish actual authority. Since “promoting” is defined as furthering progress, supporting, or actively encouraging something, it could be argued that Dortmund acted within his actual authority, and making a deal with GB could have been seen as a way of furthering progress for MC Electric. However, MC Electric could argue that by promoting sales, Dortmund 's responsibility was to try to encourage sales, but not to actually make deals. Since pricing decisions and overall sales strategy (sales plan of action) were the responsibility of the president, it could be argued that Dortmund did not have the authority to make the agreement with GB. Plans of action and agreements, like that with GB, would fall within the realm of an overall sales strategy, a responsibility of the president. Thus, it seems more likely that Dortmund did not have the actual authority to make an agreement with GB especially without communicating to or getting the approval of the …show more content…

Facts that suggest Dortmund had apparent authority are Dortmund 's role as “director of sales” and “sales promotion.” Both titles could give the impression to GB that Dortmund had authority. Additionally, GB could argue that making agreements like these fall within the usual authority of someone in Dortmund 's position by using examples in similar organizations, but more information would be needed to determine whether or not this is the norm. Finally, it should be noted that “a principal will be bound by contracts within the agent 's apparent authority only if the third party relied on that appearance of authority”(McInnes et al. 520). It seems likely that GB did rely on Dortmund 's appearance of authority, but there are still some arguments that MC Electric could present. First, it is not indicated that GB ever talked to the principal, and that their reliance on apparent authority would thus have been based only on Dortmund 's role within the company. By the way Dortmund talked, acted, or presented himself, he could have given GB a strong, but inaccurate representation that he had the authority. GB may also have relied on Dortmund being officially designated as the “director of sales”. This role may indicate apparent authority because he is in charge of “sales strategy”. Nonetheless, Dortmund 's role states that he is officially responsible

Open Document