Lord Of The Flies Movie Vs Play Analysis

1665 Words4 Pages

Entertainment is available in many ways, shapes, and forms in today’s world of technology. Oftentimes we may find that these methods of entertainment are tools for information or even criticism. These criticisms often extend over various forms of media, with the same message being delivered in a different way. This is seen in The Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, which is not only a classic literary novel but also a play. The play version of Lord of the Flies, in which I attended, although staying true to the novel, differed in significant ways from the book itself. Upon attending the Carnegie Mellon version of the play of Lord of the Flies, the first thing one may notice is that the theme is very different from the book. A theme, in …show more content…

These camera operators merely stood at the site of the acting and did not interfere at all with the storyline. This addition allowed for screens which broadcast the recordings from the camera to the rest of the audience. Thus, although some may have seen that the camera operators were simply getting in the way, the focus at that point should not have been directed to the actors, but to what was being captured and projected on the screens. One interesting attribute of this feature was that it allowed the audience to enter the play as if they were there while it was going down. The novel version of Lord of the Flies is within a third-person objective omniscient perspective. A third person objective omniscient perspective “is like a camera following the characters around, showing actions and dialogue, and not entering into the internal thoughts of the characters.” (Using Third Person Omniscient Scribophile). Thus, the play at Carnegie Mellon not only stood true to the actual book in narrative style, but also even added a layer to the enjoyment of the play with the cameras! This aspect was simply one of the most impressive things about the play and certainly played a vital role in its performance. Even if the narrative style remained true to the book, however, a difference existed in the form of …show more content…

This varies from the book because every character in The Lord of the Flies is a young boy from England. However, the argument that these differences in character are arbitrary may be implemented. For example, due to adaptation of a fraternity setting, it would not be unexpected to see college students take the roles of the main characters. One surprising part, however, cast roles were given to women, even as main characters. This does not stay true to the storyline but did appear to make a large difference in how the play was perceived by the audience. For example, Jack—played by a woman—pounced upon Ralph, who is played by a man. If one did not read the literary version of Lord of the Flies, they may mistakenly assume this as having a sexual backdrop. When cast members erotically rubbed mud on each other whilst dressed in their undergarments, confusion about a sexual theme arose. Golding himself stated that Lord of the Flies did not have sexual themes, and although the play attempted to stray away from this, one could argue that this portrayal of the play allowed for the confusion of the audience to occur. The basis of any play is casting, and it is important to obtain the right kind of people. To allow for a clearer understanding of Golding’s message, the exclusion of women should be taken into consideration. Despite this, the women did an excellent job of

Open Document