Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The necklace social class
The relationship between setting and character in the necklace
Imagery in the necklace
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The necklace social class
The short story "The Necklace" recounts the unfortunate downfall of Mme. Loisel. A meager housewife with a royal sense of self-worth, Mme. Loisel is discontent with her lowly social status. When her husband does his best to give her a place in society by getting her an invitation to an important ball, Mme. Loisel allows her excitement to give way to pride. She refuses to attend without a new dress and a loaned necklace, a symbol for Mme. Loisel’s assumptions about status based on appearance. Unfortunately, Mme. Loisel loses the necklace at the ball and with the jewels goes the Loisels’ life savings as reparations for the jewels that Mme. Loisel assumed were priceless when in fact, the necklace was a fake. “The Necklace” serves as a cautionary …show more content…
Her husband secures her an invitation to an important social event in hopes to please her, but her immediate reaction is contrary to what he hopes it will be; she strikes down the invitation. She is too dissatisfied with plain appearance to take the invitation in stride. Instead, she is rude to her husband, and letting her pride conduct her attitude, she refuses to even consider going unless she can get a new, expensive dress. She is so prideful and selfish that she never stops to consider where her husband gets the money to afford a new dress. Moments before the ball, she goes into another childish fit, and she refuses to go without an appropriately decadent looking set of jewels to wear with her new dress. She goes to a friend and, “... discovered, in a black satin box, a superb necklace of diamonds, and her heart began to beat with an immoderate desire” (Maupassant 70). Thinking it is the most expensive jewel at her disposal, she greedily selects the diamonds. As Gamini Monseka states, “The falsehood of the necklace lays bare the truth about the whole system of social hierarchy. Just like the false diamonds, anything that looks precious is valued in that society” (8). She finds her value in looking like …show more content…
Loisel, whether or not she realizes it. Just as she longs to appear to live above her means, the necklace itself is deceitful about its true value. Mme. Forestier never notices that the new necklace is made of real jewels because she does not have the same complex regarding pride that Mme. Loisel has. She knows it is an expensive appearing fake, which is ironic because an expensive fake is exactly what Mme. Loisel makes of herself through her use of the necklace. Mme. Loisel is only content when she is able to deceive her colleagues. Her pride and discontent leads her to covet the necklace in the first place because she believes she is misplaced in her social caste and she wants to look wealthy so that other socialites can see she belongs, but what she is missing is that the other ladies of high status in her community do not care for the same displays of wealth that Mme. Loisel thinks defines the wealthy. From Mme. Loisel and the theme of “The Necklace”, readers see the destruction putting on such a façade causes. Mme. Loisel lives as a shell of her former self. After years of manual labor taken on to pay for the necklace, she has nothing left to take pride in, although her need to have pride is the reason she now lives a destitute existence. The necklace is not worth much, but by assuming it is valuable as a means of boosting her own self worth, Mme. Loisel learns a valuable lesson about just how ruinous pride and
This story is about Matilda and her husband. Matilda receives an invitation to attend to a party, but she has no jewelry to wear, so she borrows one from a rich friend. Unfortunately, Matilda loses the necklace at the party and has to buy a new one worth thirty-five thousand francs. She works for years to repay all the money she borrowed, but when she finally gets all the money, she finds out the necklace was worth “No more than five hundred francs.” This story has two unexpected twists in it: she loses the necklace and she works for years to pay it off, only to find out it is less than one sixth of what she paid. How Matilda deals with finding out the price is left to the reader’s imagination, but it shows that when Matilda loses the necklace she deals with it relatively calmly, borrowing money to buy a new one and later working for years to pay it
The Irony in the Necklace is that Mme Losueil spent so much time and effort to be extravagant and look good and it was futile because she lost the necklace her friend gave her and she had to work even more for the replacement of the Necklace . The proof and evidence that proves this is that they had no choice but to let their maid go because they could not afford to pay her anymore because of the debts the got into replacing the Necklace . The irony is that Mme Loisel and her husband have been well off all their whole lives and because of the fact that they had to pay of the debts by the end of the short story they became poor and they experienced the hardship of the common man . Another irony in the Necklace is that throughout the whole story Mme Loisel even thought she owed the rich woman money it turned out the Necklace was only worth five hundred dollars . This story shows that there is a disconnection between the different social classes because poor people unlike Mme Loisel are not worrying about how extravagant they look but instead they are worried about buying basic clothes and food for their kids and the dissociation is that Mme Loisel is worried and obsessed with how extravagant she looks . This short story is saying that as individuals we should stop obsessing about our looks and focus
One should appreciate the lifestyle they were raised in and not focus or desire materialistic things. In “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant, Madame Loisel, born into a family of clerks, believed she deserved the finer things in life. However, she was forced to marry a clerk and since then she chose to suffer instead of appreciating what her husband had to offer. One evening, her husband brought her an invitation to a ball in hopes to make her happy. Instead, Madame Loisel became irritated and complained she didn’t have anything to wear. Willing to do anything to make her happy, her husband sacrificed the money he had been saving up for a little shooting next summer so she would buy the dress she wanted. As the ball was approaching, Madame
To start off, before Mme. Loisel attends the party she was described as a very beautiful women, but with negative attitude towards life. Throughout her life she believed that she deserved better things in her life just because she was beautiful and charming. In the story “The Necklace,” Loisel states, “… feeling she had been born for all the little niceties and luxuries of living” (line 11-12). This reveals that, she visualized a grander life for herself, not the crummy life she has now. She would have everything she needed in life plus more. Also, she seems like she would do anything to get that kind of life (including, leaving her husband). She also thinks her clothes should be just like her, gorgeous. Mme. Loisel also states, “She had no evening clothes, no jewels, nothing. But those were the things she wanted; she felt that was the kind of life for her” (line 35-36). As you can see, she lives the opposite of a luxurious life, but after receiving the invitation to the
This story took place in 1908. Mme Loisel and her husband M. Loisel lived in Paris. They were invited to a party one night and M. Loisel received a beautiful, diamond, necklace from a companion for his wife to wear at the party. After the party is over, when Mme Loisel goes to grab the necklace, she notices the necklace is gone. She works the rest of her life to replace the lost necklace.
Situational irony occurs throughout most of The Necklace; it appears when Madame Forestier lends Madame Loisel a diamond necklace since “[she’s] upset because [she] haven’t a single piece of jewelry or a gemstone or anything to wear with [her] dress.[She’ll] look like a pauper. [She] almost think[s] it would be better if [she] didn’t go” and lets her borrow it for a ball one night so Madame Loisel can fit in; however, she ends up losing the necklace(174).Madame Loisel was not informed of the fact that the diamond necklace was actually fake. In a panic, Madame Loisel and her husband work hard and pay the loans off for many years trying to replace the necklace only to find out it wasn’t real; they gave up their decent lifestyle and had to save up for ten years. The situational irony is the fact that Madame Loisel thought that if she borrowed the diamond necklace it would help her become closer to the life she wanted, but the necklace ended up putting her and her husband into poverty and without the life that she longed for, instead. The ten years of poverty that Madame Loisel and
The falling action of the story was when Madame Loisel learned her lesson. For ten years, she and her husband slaved away to make up the money for the necklace. The jeweller stated a solid price of 34,000 francs. As the couple only possessed 18,000, they borrowed the rest from multiple people with the intent of paying them back, and they did. Ten years later and the debt was payed off, with the biggest change being Madame Loisel’s looks. She use to be a beautiful, young-looking woman, but in those ten years, it looked as if she aged fifty. This brings us to the resolution of the story. Madame Loisel was out for a Sunday walk when she bumped into her old friend that leant her the diamond necklace ten years ago. Madame Forestier didn’t even recognize her because of how much she aged. After Madame Loisel told her that the reason she looked so different was because of her necklace, Madame Forestier revealed the biggest plot twist. The beautiful diamond necklace that Madame Loisel lost and spent so many hours replacing was fake. It was worth 500 francs at the most. The ending of “The Necklace” was very shocking but clever on the author’s part. Without the big finale, the story would be remembered as mediocre at best, but with the resolution, the story was quite memorable.
Values are spread all around the world, and many people’s values differ. These can lead to people being judged, or indirectly characterized by other people. In “The Necklace” Mme. Loisel is a beautiful woman with a decent life, and a husband that loves her, and only wants to make her happy. She is not rich but she makes it along, she insists of a better, wealthier life. When her husband gets her invited to a ball, she feels the need for a brand new fancy dress and tons of jewelry. When the couple realizes they cannot afford jewelry as well, they search out to borrow her friend, Mme. Forestiers’ necklace. She comes to notice she no longer has the necklace on when she leaves the ball. This later troubles her, as she has to work for a long time to collect enough money to buy a new necklace. This story describes the relationship between a couple, who have different dreams, and how desires can revamp your life. Guy de Maupassant, the author of “The Necklace” uses literary devices to prove people come before materialistic items.
“The Necklace”, narrated by Guy de Maupassant in 3rd person omniscient, focuses the story around Mathilde Loisel who is middle class, and her dreams of fame and fortune. The story is set in 19th century France. One day, Mathilde’s husband brings home an invitation to a fancy ball for Mathilde; to his surprise Mathilde throws a fit because she doesn’t have a dress or jewelry to wear to the ball. M. Loisel gets her the beautifully expensive dress she desires and Mathilde borrows a diamond necklace from Mme. Forestier, a rich acquaintance of Mathilde. Mathilde goes to the ball and has a night she’s dreamed of, until she gets home from the ball at 4 A.M. to find
Ten years of suffering is the cost of having pleasure for only one night! In “The Necklace,” by Guy de Maupassant presents Mathilde Loisel, an attractive, charming but vacuous and selfish middle class lady transforms to selfness, poor, satisfied and hard-working lady. Even though, Mathidle owns a comfortable home and married to a faithful and kind husband, Monsieur Loisel, who seeks her happiness and satisfaction; she was ungrateful to the things that she had been given, because her greed and desire of wealth had captured her thoughts and blurred the real meaning of happiness in her perspective. Mathidle spends most of her time surfing in her day dreams of being wealthy and suffering from accepting the reality, because her imagination was more than she could not afford. One day Mathidle’s husband brought his wife an invitation for a fancy party, but as a result of their low income, Mathidle’s was ashamed to wear flowers as decoration, so she decided to borrow an expensive looking necklace from a friend of her, Madame Forestier. After attending the fabulous party and spending a memorable great time looking stunningly beautiful, Mathidle discovers that she had lost the expensive necklace that she borrowed, so she decides to buy a similar copy of the necklace to her friend after loaning an enormous amount of money and narrowing the house outcome. The author surprises his readers with a perfectly detailed twist at the end of the story. Losing the necklace was a turning point in Mathidle’s life and the best thing that ever happened to her.
Between misplacing priorities and self-absorption Mathilde Loisel is created in the story, “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant. Mathilde has just about everything a woman could want: remarkable beauty, a loving husband, and a comfortable lifestyle. Material riches are the only category in which she believes she is inadequate to other women. This one factor sets up the conflict present in the story. Throughout the turmoil she must endure, due to her egotistical ways, one would think she would have a change in heart and mindset. Mathilde has a dissatisfied disposition that does not evolve even as her situation does; she is disgruntled being in the middle class, as well as attending a first class event, and ultimately being in the working class.
In The Necklace by Guy de Maupassant the husband "Monsieur Loisel is content with the small pleasures of his life, but does his best to appease Mathilde's demands and assuage her complaints"(Spark Notes). By any means, Monsieur will do anything or try to do anything to make his wife happy. Mathilde the protagonist who's a stunning lady with beautiful looks who feel the need to be rich, so she stays dreaming of what her life would be like as a rich lady. Although she was not rich, but mid class she did have a rich friend that she stays away from because of the simple fact that she was not as fortun...
“The Necklace” ends up to be a very ironic story as it explains why valuing the more important things in life can be very effective towards a person’s happiness. One example of the story’s irony is when she is at the party dressed as a beautiful and fancy woman. ‘She danced madly, wildly, drunk with pleasure, giving no thought to anything in the triumph of her beauty, the pride of her success…’ (pg 193). This is a form of dramatic irony because Guy explains earlier that Mme. Loisel is just a middle class woman who dreams of a wealthy life, but she is just alluding herself as a luxurious woman. Another example of irony in the story is when Madame found out that the necklace was paste. On page 196, Mme. Forestier, Ma...
As I did research on how others interpreted the story, the same conclusion would pop up. The necklace was used as a symbol of higher class of wealth. We use symbolic items to try and fit into societies belief of “fancy”. The deeper meaning is within the true value of the necklace. It is a fake just as she is! She is trying to be something she is not and ends up losing the necklace which holds a false value as well. This is why a person should not take everything as it
The Necklace also displays distinctive realism in the use of socioeconomic influences which are essential to the plot. The major conflict in the story would be absent and the theme would not be obtainable without Mathilde Loisel’s insecurity about her own socioeconomic reputation. An example of Loisel’s self-deprivation nature is presented when she realizes she does not have a necklace, she says “I shall look absolutely no one. I would almost rather not go to the party” (Maupassant, sec. 3). Another example of the self-conflict caused by social pressure is Loisel’s immediate attempt to replace the necklace and her reluctance to speak to her friend Madame Forestier about the necklace for ten whole years. If she were not conflicted by societal pressures she might have avoided the whole situation altogether. The Necklace establishes a realistic difference in value between the necklaces and proposed clothing. Her husband proposes flowers which were valued 10 franks so in any case if she had chosen the flowers there would have been an insignificant economic loss. Her decision not to tell her friend about the necklace ends up costing her seven times the worth of the original. The roses symbolize the simpler things in life to the theme of the story. Mathilde Loisel’s withered appearance at the end