My Impression of Two Plays Read in Class In “Molly Has Her Say,” Margaret Bruchac uses a twenty-something female character who is a graduate student. Molly Marie meets the requirement for the play to deliver the desired message which is the social intercourse between the Natives and the Euro-Americans. Masterfully, Bruchac incorporates dialect to be part of the play. While reading or narrating the story behind the drama, Molly speaks, but does not talk in standard American English. A technique that differs from other plays in this anthology, such as “The Woman Who Was a Red Deer Dressed for the Deer Dance.” This is important since the playwright wants to differentiate her players, a Native American, from the audience, mainly non-native American. The dichotomy plays a function of separation ad yet of identity. Molly represents those Native Americans whose history has been diluted in the Euro-American culture. The latter despises, at least in the context of the play, the Native American culture. There is a sense of educating and re-stating a strong identity connection with the bases from which young intellectual tend to fall …show more content…
Glancy instead uses a standard form of English to reach, perhaps, a more academic audience or perform it for a larger public than Bruchac’s. One thing that I notice is the use of simple plain language. It does not rely on fancy words with obscure meaning. Thus, making it accessible for any types of audiences: children and adults, college and general public. All the women involved in performing these projects seek to broader the audience to which Native American theater reaches. Additionally, the language and the setting used to allow for easy replication of the same play by other artists outside the Native American producers; moreover, school kids can perform in arts class with low cost and fast
11 Miriam Gurko, The Ladies of Seneca Falls. (New York: Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc. 1974.)
An Asian-American writer growing up in a tight and traditional Chinese community in California, Kingston is placed by her background and time period to be at the unique nexus of an aged, stale social institution and a youthful, boisterous one. She has had to face life as an alien to the culture of the land she grew up in, as well as a last witness of some scattered and unspeakably tragic old ideals. She saw the sufferings and has suffered herself; but instead of living life demurely in the dark corner of the family room like she was expected to, Kingston became the first woman warrior to voice the plight of the mute females in both Chinese and American societies. The seemingly immeasurable and indeed unconquerable gap between the two fundamentally divided cultures comes together in herself and her largely autobiographical work The Woman Warrior: Memoirs of a Girlhood Among Ghosts.
In Miranda’s poem “Stories I Tell My Daughter,” she describes a girl who defends her identity and her honor when a boy at school questions her. Miranda states, “That day/ I took bloody sticks home to my mother,/ who said she expected nothing less/ from a girl/ who spoke/ to owls” (Indian Cartography 5-6). In the poem, “owls,” a symbol of intelligence and enlightenment, acts as a reminder of the important cultural connection between Native Americans and nature. The girl has reached enlightenment and new found strength because she realizes that she does not have to succumb to the white children’s abuse and she finally reacts to the exploitation. When referring to “mother,” one thinks of a caregiver and nurturer. The mother nurtures the daughter who has learned to defend herself and break social norms in order to protect her cultural identity. Finally, “bloody” implies violence and rage. When discussing indigenous poetry, the violence described typically refers to the bloodshed of the natives; however, ironically the blood in this poem results from an attack on a white person. Though Miranda does not encourage violence, she does encourage action from strong women when their cultural identities are being questioned. Likewise, Trask also connects strong women who break social norms with change. In her poem “Sons,” she addresses the social expectations of women and the familial obligations many of them abide by in their homes. Trask states, “I am slyly/ Reproductive: ideas/ books,/ history/ politics, reproducing/ the rope of resistance/ for unborn generations” (Light in the Crevice Never Seen 55-56). To begin, “resistance” refers to defiance and a refusal to conform. The speaker is assertively stating that she will serve as an activist for future Native Hawaiians who will
In the novel excerpt “Two kinds,” Amy Tan uses the central conflict to develop the theme through the clash of cultural identities. Tan shows the reader how culture is dynamic in each individual person. Culture can be mixed and change over time.
In an initially superficial investigation of the text, Brecht's The Jewish Wife is aesthetically structured in the same concrete format of melodrama. Though only a one-act piece, the play is broken down into a series of distinct units, each one an intense highlight of the protagonist's life (Brooks, 87). Superfluous exposition is almost entirely eliminated from the text and the audience is introduced to the heroine, Judith Keith, through her rather impersonal phone conversations.
The very beginning of the piece grabs you with its opening sentence: ‘From the time I was a small child, I was aware that I was different.’ How was she different? She goes on to explain she was of mixed blood; that a Caucasian man had married her great-grandmother. Then, she immediately switches to talking about her family; primarily her grandmother. She does this throughout the essay; changing topics to newer items close enough to be relevant, but different enough evolve a steady plot point. She goes from her grandmother as a jumping board to go to most old pueblo people, to the ‘unique’ (by western culture standards) traditions of those the elderly, to the stories behind those traditions.
...he class barriers that exist in society and the differences between these different groups. She comes to see the differences and the similarities between her life and that of the two boys.
Fetterley, Judith. The Resisting Reader: A Feminist Approach to American Literature. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press, xi-xxiv. Print.
Louise Erdrich’s short story “American horse” is a literary piece written by an author whose works emphasize the American experience for a multitude of different people from a plethora of various ethnic backgrounds. While Erdrich utilizes a full arsenal of literary elements to better convey this particular story to the reader, perhaps the two most prominent are theme and point of view. At first glance this story seems to portray the struggle of a mother who has her son ripped from her arms by government authorities; however, if the reader simply steps back to analyze the larger picture, the theme becomes clear. It is important to understand the backgrounds of both the protagonist and antagonists when analyzing theme of this short story. Albetrine, who is the short story’s protagonist, is a Native American woman who characterizes her son Buddy as “the best thing that has ever happened to me”. The antagonist, are westerners who work on behalf of the United States Government. Given this dynamic, the stage is set for a clash between the two forces. The struggle between these two can be viewed as a microcosm for what has occurred throughout history between Native Americans and Caucasians. With all this in mind, the reader can see that the theme of this piece is the battle of Native Americans to maintain their culture and way of life as their homeland is invaded by Caucasians. In addition to the theme, Erdrich’s usage of the third person limited point of view helps the reader understand the short story from several different perspectives while allowing the story to maintain the ambiguity and mysteriousness that was felt by many Natives Americans as they endured similar struggles. These two literary elements help set an underlying atmos...
She explains how she was one of the only non-white, non-Christians in her school. This labeled her as “exotic” although she just wanted to be a normal student with equal opportunities. Her family came to America in search of equal opportunity, but what they found was resistance and discrimination aimed at those not naturally
...her defiance to no longer comply with the gender constructions of society. Ibsen, therefore, criticises society’s compliance with the constructions of the culture and urges us to be more like Nora is at her epiphany. Lady Bracknell is memorable for her comically masculine traits and character. Not only does Wilde shatter our gender expectations, but ridicules the compliance of individuals in the performances that they make for society. Both plays raise questions regarding the submission of men and women to society’s presumptions and pressure regarding gender, and criticise individuals for conforming without asking questions. Each play makes us question our own performances for society and the performances of others in our lives. Nora’s realisation that she has married a construction is as unnerving now as it was to its contemporary audience because it forces us to look at our own behaviour and that of others around us, presenting us with a frightening and menacing awareness that we also may be existing in false and constructed lives.
In order to discuss the relations between sexuality and linguistic versatility I have chosen the two female characters, Molly and Gerty. The major reason for this is because the female voice in Ulysses is heard at length on only two occasions but I would argue is very important. So important in fact, that Joyce chooses to conclude the novel with Molly’s monologue. I hope to convey some of the contrasts and similarities in these differing monologues (despite the fact that in Gerty’s case it is technically not ever her monologue). In addition, I have tried to take into account that one is perceiving relations between female sexuality and linguistic versatility through the eyes of a man.
and do things themselves. One of the women gets her own job and the other leaves her daughter for adoption. Thus showing they are making their own decisions in life. This is unheard of in the 1800's and shows Ibsen trying to have a society in which women do have an identity in society and can be heard. Throughout the play, a women is shown doing her own thinking and not listening to what men have to say even though that is not how it used to be. Ibsen creates this new society in which anyone, no matter the gender, should be able to make their own decisions about life and how to live it.
Can identity be a sharp weapon to overcome restrictions and oppression. Jose Munoz, a former performance studies professor at NYU argued in his article "The White to Be Angry" that identity is manipulative. According to Munoz, the manipulation of identity is called disidenticaction. Instead of rejecting society or a group wholesale, someone who disidentifies accepts some aspects of that society or group without assimilating to the dominant ideals. People, especially in minority groups, developed disdentifciation as an offensive mechanism because it allowed them to function within that group or society without becoming trapped. Munoz's theory provides a powerful analytical lens which I will use to evaluate the characters Corliss and Harlan in Sherman Alexie's Search Engine. Corliss is a Spokane Indian who aspires to evade the restriction placed on her by white and Indian society. Her motivation to evade her restrictions originates from her amour for poetry and books, which allow her to identify with literary figures such as a white Jesuit priest, Homer and Odysseus . Harlan is a Spokane Indian who was adopted and raised by white people. He attempts to define his identity as an Indian thorough writing poetry, which results in his acknowledgement as an Indian by white people. Books and poetry allow Corliss and Harlan to disidentify with their societal norms, and the opportunity to evade their society's restrictions and find humanity.
...the characters show how loosing their write to vote and therefore express their opinion, and especially having to carry an identity booklet all the time (just because of the colour of their skin) can generate an inside crisis on one's identity. Is our identity determined by our name? Can we change name and be able to keep a stable identity? This play also raises the issue of being actors, just to survive in the society they lived in. Not being able to show their feelings and their disappointment at any time, obliged them to smile, sing, and fake.