Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of liquidity ratios
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of liquidity ratios
Liquidity Ratios (KS) The term liquidity refers to the speed and ease with which an asset can be converted to the most liquid of all assets, cash (Ross 23). Liquidity ratios are used to determine a company’s ability to pay off short-term and long-term debt obligations. There are a few common liquidity ratios that include the current ratio and the quick ratio. • Current Ratio The current ratio is used to measure a company’s short-term liquidity. The current ratio is calculated by dividing current assets by current liabilities. This is used as an indicator of a company’s ability to pay back its’ liabilities with its’ assets. Apple Inc. current ratio in 2010 was 2.01, the current ratio in 2011 was 1.61, the current ratio in 2012 was 1.50, the current ratio Google’s parent company Alphabet Inc.’s current ratios are quite impressive indicating the likelihood of the company paying back its’ short-term debts is rather likely. The company’s current ratio in 2010 was 4.16, in 2011 the current ratio was5.92, the current ratio in 2012 was 4.58, the current ratio was 4.58 in 2013, and in the most recent year reported, 2014, Google’s parent company’s current ratio was 4.80 (10-K. Google Inc. 2014.) Hewlett-Packard Co.’s current ratios fell below the ratios of both Apple and Google. In 2010 Hewlett-Packard Co.’s current ratio was 1.10, the current ratio for the company in 2011 was 1.01, in 2012 the current ratio was 1.09, in 2013 the current ratio was 1.11, and in the most recent year reported by Hewlett-Packard Co., 2014, their current ratio was 1.15. Looking at HP’s current ratios, it can be assumed that they are less likely to pay back their short-term debts as compared with both Apple and Google (“Annual Financials for Hewlett-Packard
Suppliers are mostly concerned with a company 's ability to pay on their liabilities. Therefore, the current ratio and the quick ratio are both looked at by suppliers. The current ratio takes a company’s current assets and divides that by the company’s current liabilities. This number is
Net working capital represents organization’s operating liquidity. In order to compute the net working capital, total current assets are divided from total current liabilities. When there is sufficient excess of current assets over current liabilities, an organization might be considered sufficiently liquid. Another ratio that helps in assessing the operating liquidity of as company is a current ratio. The ratio is calculated by dividing the total current assets over total current liabilities. When the current ratio is high, the organization has enough of current assets to pay for the liabilities. Yet, another mean of calculating the organization’s debt-paying ability is the debt ratio. To calculate the ratio, total liabilities are divided by total assets. The computation gives information on what proportion of organization’s assets is financed by a debt, and what is the entity’s ability to pay for current and long term liabilities. Lower debt ratio is better, because the low liabilities require low debt payments. To be able to lend money, an organization’s current ratio has to fall above a certain level, also the debt ratio cannot rise above a certain threshold. Otherwise, the entity will not be able to lend money or will have to pay high penalties. The following steps can be undertaken by a company to keep the debt ratio within normal
Another observation is that GM looks to use more debt financing that equity financing for funding their activities. The debt to equity ratio has steadily decreased over the past five years and is higher that the industry average. Also, the current and quick ratios are much lower than the industry averages. This again can pose so...
This ratio is calculated by dividing (short-term debt plus long-term debt) by (short-term debt plus long term-debt plus shareholder?s equity). Based on data shown in page 70 of their 2015 Financials.
From the table 3 it is indicated that the current ratio of British Petroleum is higher than one both in the recent financial statements i.e. of 2014 and in the financial statement of previous year i.e. of 2013. In 2013 the current ratio of British Petroleum is 1.33 which indicates that the company has sufficient current assets to satisfy it short term liabilities. However, the current ratio in 2014 is 1.37 (BP Global, 2014) indicating increase and depicting that is in position to satisfy its short term debts. Thus this indicates the strength of company in satisfying its debt.
When analyzing the time interest earned ratio, the higher ratio is better. Since Jones Inc.’s most recent ratio is 2.7356, this means that they could cover their interest expenses about 2.7 times or that Jones Inc.’s income is about 2.7 times higher than interest expenses. Higher ratios are better because they indicate a company’s ability to honor their debt commitments; high ratios are less risky. Over time, Jones Inc. has maintained a ratio varying slightly around 1.75. This ratio has increased for Jones Inc. in the past year because they paid off significant debt. Before this increase, their ratio was a little lower than their competitor’s. An investor who is solely concerned with this ratio will prefer a company with the higher ratio. Now that Jones Inc. has surpassed its competitor, it is more attractive to investors. Depending on their future funding from debt, they should continue with the same ratio, and even increase
This is another sign of a strong company, although it is not uncommon for a company to have a down year. These ratios show the following: · Nike has a very good ability to pay current liabilities. This was evident in the current ratio and the acid test. · Nike has an excellent ability to pay short term and long-term debt. This was proven in the debt ratio and times-interest-earned ratio.
Current Ratio – For the last three years was growing from 3.56 in 2001 to 3.81 in 2002 to 4.22 in 2003. The reason of grow is increased in Assets. Even though Liability was growing, Asset grow was more significant.
In regards to the corporation’s balance sheet, it is necessary to place an importance on liquidity ratios to demonstrate the company’s ability to pay its short term obligations such as accounts payable and notes that have a duration of less than one year. These commonly used liquidity ratios include the current ratio, quick ratio, and cash ratio. All three ratios are used to measure the liquidity of a company or business. The current ratio is used to indicate a business’s ability to meet maturing obligations. The quick ratio is used to indicate the company’s ability to pay off debt. Finally the cash ratio is used to measure the amount of capital as well short term counterparts a business has over its current liabilities.
Kodak’s debt ratio has been improving since 2012 when it was considerably above 1. Their 2014 debt ratio is 0.89, which is very close to Hewlett-Packard and Sony. The debt-to-equity ratio of Kodak is the first signal within the ratios that the company is not performing well. Generally, this ratio should be below 1 and for Kodak in 2014 it was 8.83. Their equity is almost non-existent and this is signaling very weak balance sheet strength. Compared to Kodak, Hewlett-Packard and Sony are doing okay, but their ratios are both well above 1. In terms of ability to pay interest, Kodak’s only strong year was 2013. Their ratio has dipped in 2014, showing that they aren’t able to pay their interest or are struggling to pay it. Hewlett-Packard had no interest expense in their latest fiscal year and Sony’s ratio is very strong. In 2012, Kodak’s free cash flow was in the negatives (-$1,176,000). Surprisingly, it reached over two million in 2013, but then dropped to only $33,000 in 2014. Without sufficient cash flow, Kodak is going to have a difficult time increasing their shareholder value. Hewlett-Packard has free cash flow over five million dollars which is huge compared to Kodak. Kodak does not seem to have sufficient cash to handle their business obligations. The cash flow adequacy ratio should be above 1, but Kodak’s are negative. The competitors are around 0.5 for their cash flow adequacy ratio, which
This section will discuss ratio analysis for the following ratios: current ratio, quick (acid-test) ratio, average collection period, debt to assets ratio, debt to equity ratio, interest coverage ratio, net profit margin, and price to earnings ratio. Depending on the end user which ratio carries more importance, however, all must be familiar with ratio analysis. Details on each company's performance for each of these areas can be found in the attached ratio analysis worksheet.
The Quick Ratio shows that the company’s cash and cash equivalents are the highest t...
Ratios traditionally measure the most important factors such as liquidity, solvency and profitability, as well as other measures of solvency. Different studies have found various ratios to be the most efficient indicators of solvency. Studies of ratio analysis began in the 1930’s, with several studies of the concluding that firms with the potential to file bankruptcy all exhibited different ratios than those companies that were financially sound. Among the study’s findings were that the deciding factor of the predictor of bankruptcy should not be only a few ratios, as the measure of a company’s financial solvency may differ as the firm’s situations differ. The important question is to which ratios are to be used and of those ratios chosen, which ratios are given priority weight.
Before beginning an analysis of a company it is necessary to have a complete set of financial statements, preferably for the pas few years so that historical trends can be obtained. Ratios are a way for anyone to get an idea of the financial performance of a company by using the information contained in the financial statements. Ratios are grouped into four basic categories, liquidity, activity, profitability, and financial leverage. This document will use a variety of these ratios to analyze the firm, Sample Company, as of December 31,2000.
The debt ratios increased by 2.7% to 57% more than double the industry standard of 24.5%. The long term debt increased from $700,000 to $ 1,165,250 an increment of 66.5% in the year 2002. The company is currently highly leveraged thus it needs to work on reducing long term debts and continue to increase assets. The times interest earned ratio dropped by 0.3 to 1.6 in the year 2003. The company could face difficulties making interest payments in case of a sales slump.