Lennie Irvin's Misperceptions On The Study Of Africa?

730 Words2 Pages

Shabiha Khan
Marcel Brousseau
Writing 2
05-05-14
The Study of Africa

As L.Lennie Irvin mentioned “look for the things that interest you” in “What is “Academic” Writing?” I realized when I do something I am interested on it makes my works easier and more funny. For example Africa, first things comes into to mind when we talk about Africa is, poverty, unstable governments, war, and violence; some people even believe that Africa is a country. The reason behind this is because due to biased conclusions coming from different theories, methods and Africanist (who studies about Africa), the media enforces misperceptions about Africa. As Azevedo mentioned in “Africana Studies and the State of the Art” Africana Studies, when it comes to Africa, the “media focuses on exotic negative news such as drought, and famine, civil war, and widespread poverty” (1). In reality, Africa has a layered history behind it that is waiting to be unfolded. African Studies is a field that derives from the combinations of disciplines—information accumulated over time based on one particular research. Africanists such as anthropologists, and historians are major contributors of study of the continent of Africa. As L.Lennie Irvin mentioned “make a point and support it” in “What is “Academic” Writing?” in this essay I will support my point with evidence from the sources I found.
Anthropology, the study of culture, attempted to observe what they called “primitive tribes” (Azevedo 11) in an objective matter. It is clear from their language in their descriptions of the cultures that their methods were not objective and their bias was both ethno- and Eurocentric. “The first ethnographers who worked during the 1920s through the 1940s did their research in collaborat...

... middle of paper ...

...ropologist and historians both focus on African and African people all came up with different conclusions. African scholar Thandika Mkandawire (who is paraphrased in Azevedo) is known for his criticisms on the present state of African studies. One of his most important criticisms is that the focus on dubious theoretical frameworks leads to a tendency to bend reality to fit these frameworks. This is certainly a pressing concern. Rather than simply doing away with the frameworks from the past the best solution is to accept the necessity of composite frameworks that do not overemphasize a single way of understanding Africa’s history. If scholars on Africa are truly to come to a better understanding of Africa they must first understand that Africa is a continent not a theory and that theories exist only as tools to help us rather than guide us along a well-trodden path.

Open Document